DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Environmental Values of Fashion Consumers on Purchase Satisfaction and Repurchase Intention of Eco-friendly Fashion Products

패션 소비자의 환경가치가 친환경 패션제품 구매만족도 및 재구매의도에 미치는 영향

Hong, Byung-Sook;Lee, Eun-Jin;Chu, Young-Joo
홍병숙;이은진;주영주

  • Received : 2010.03.03
  • Accepted : 2010.04.05
  • Published : 2010.08.30

Abstract

This study analyzes how the environmental values of fashion consumers influence the purchase satisfaction and repurchase intention of eco-friendly fashion products. The survey was conducted from June $1^{st}$ to $30^{th}$ in 2009, and 343 responses were used in the data analysis. The statistical analysis methods were frequency analysis, factor analysis, reliability analysis, and multiple regression analysis. The results show that the environmental values is classified by environment conservative value, economical value, social altruistic value, and egocentric value. The social altruistic value of fashion consumers affects purchase satisfaction of eco-friendly fashion products. The social altruistic value, environment conservative value, and egocentric value affect the repurchase intention of eco-friendly fashion products.

Keywords

environmental values;eco-friendly fashion products;purchase satisfaction;repurchase intention

References

  1. 김연신. (2004). 친환경 행동과 친환경 소비주의의 결정요인들. 한국광고학보, 6(4), 7-49.
  2. 김재휘, 박유진. (2002). 환경적 가치지향과 결과지각이 환경행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지, 16(1), 19-34.
  3. 김효진, 이혜주. (2009). 웰빙 사회의 소비자 가치지향, 지각된 가치, 브랜드 선호도가 친환경 화장품 구매의도에 미치는 영향. 한국미용학회지, 15(1), 327-341.
  4. 남미우, 정재만. (2007). 의복추구혜택에 따른 소비자 유형별 천연염색 의류제품의 소비행동에 관한 연구. 대한가정학회지, 45(7), 105-117.
  5. 남수정, 유현정. (2007). 소비자의 웰빙태도 및 웰빙상품에 대한 만족도: 기대-불일치 패러다임을 중심으로. 대한가정학회지, 45(5), 1-13.
  6. 민현선, 이기춘. (1999). 환경친화적 소비태도와 소비행동간의 관계. 대한가정학회지, 37(1), 29-44.
  7. 박경윤. (2000). 환경친화적 소비자행동에 관한 이론적 연구. 경주대학교 논문집, 13, pp. 295-309.
  8. 박상오. (2008). 웰빙웨어 디자인제품에 관한 연구-섬유제품의 소비자 구매행동을 중심으로-. 한양대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  9. 박옥련, 정유정. (2006). 소비자 가치지향과 환경친화적 의류소비행동에 관한 연구. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 8(3), 1135-1146.
  10. 박운아. (1997). 기혼 여성의 환경친화적 소비자 행동. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  11. 박현희, 오송대. (2005). 물질주의 선향과 환경의식이 의복의 재활용 태도 및 행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 대한가정학회지, 43(10), 167-177.
  12. 박효원, 김용숙. (2005). 20대-30대 여성의 웰빙 라이프스타일에 따른 자연주의 화장품 구매행동. 복식, 55(6), 93-106.
  13. 유기농 청바지.에크백, '에코 패션' 뜬다. (2009, 4. 17). 조선일보. 자료검색일 2010, 3. 29, 자료출처 http://www.chosun.com
  14. 이기춘, 박운아. (1997). 소비자의 환경친화적 행동과 관련 요인 분석. 대한가정학회지, 35(5), 221-238.
  15. 이종호, 김은환. (1999). 그린마케팅에 대한 소비자의 태도에 관한 연구. 경영교육 논총, 19, 273-294.
  16. 이지은, 김일, 박선경. (2002). 환경친화적 의류제품에 대한 소비자 태도에 관한 연구. 패션비즈니스학회지, 6(2), 77-92.
  17. 정유정. (2007). 소비자 가치지향과 의복추구혜택에 따른 환경친화적 의류소비행동 연구. 경성대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  18. 정희정. (2009). 환경친화적 태도에 따른 친환경 패션제품 구매행동. 경희대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  19. 주현식. (2008). 소비자 가치가 LOHAS 태도 및 지향행동에 미치는 영향관계. 관광연구, 23(3), 317-335.
  20. 최은진, 김영신. (2007). 대학생 소비자의 가치, 환경지식 및 환경관여도가 환경의식적 행동에 미치는 영향. 소비문화연구, 10(3), 15-41.
  21. 한승희, 정미애. (2009). 한일 주부의 친환경 소재 패션상품 구매행동 및 인식 비교. 복식, 59(8), 110-122.
  22. 허원무, 안준희. (2009). 실버소비자의 친환경 제품에 대한 소비가치가 만족도, 신뢰, 충성도에 미치는 영향-하이브리드 카를 중심으로-. 한국노년학회지, 29(1), 195-213.
  23. 홍병숙, 조유현. (2006). 중노년 여성의 웰빙 추구 성향에 따른 화장품 사용 및 만족도. 대한가정학회지, 44(11), 43-50.
  24. 2010 주목할 소비트렌드 7. (2010, 1. 6). LG경제연구원. 자료검색일 2010, 2. 15, 자료출처 http://www.lgeri.com
  25. Alwitt, L. F., & Pitts, R. E. (1996). Predicting purchase intentions for an environmentally sensitive product. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5(1), 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0501_03
  26. Anderson, W. T., & Cunningham, W. H. (1972). The socially conscious consumer. Journal of Marketing, 36(7), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251036
  27. Balderjahn, I. (1988). Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns. Journal of Business Research, 17(1), 51-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(88)90022-7
  28. Boulding, A. K., Ajav, S. P., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1993). A dynamic process model of service quality: From expectations to behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(2), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172510
  29. Butler, S. M., & Francis, S. (1997). The effects of environmental attitudes on apparel purchasing behavior. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 15(2), 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9701500202
  30. Ha-Brookshire, J. E., & Hodges, N. N. (2009). Socially responsible consumer behavior?: Exploring used clothing donation behavior. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 27(3), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X08327199
  31. Henion, K. E. (1972). Concern about toxic wastes: Three demographic predictors. Journal of Marketing Research, 9(1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/3149598
  32. Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1988). A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 638-646. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.638
  33. Howard, J., & Sheth, J. N. (1969). The theory of buyer behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  34. Karp, D. G. (1996). Values and their effects on pro-environmental behavior. Environmental and Behavior, 28(1), 111-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916596281006
  35. Kim, H. S., & Damhorst, M. L. (1998). Environmental concern and apparel consumption. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 16(3), 126-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9801600303
  36. Naughton, M., Sebold, F., & Mayer, T. (1990). The impacts of the California beverage container recycling and litter reduction act on consumers. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 24(1), 190-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1990.tb00265.x
  37. Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
  38. Oskamp, S., Harrington, M., Edwards, T., Sherwood, D., Okuda, S., & Swanson, D. (1991). Factors influencing household recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior, 23(4) 494-519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591234005
  39. Paul, J. P., & Olson, J. (2007). Consumer behavior and marketing strategy (8th ed.). New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
  40. Peattie, K. J. (1992). Green marketing. London: M&E Handbook.
  41. Schultz, P. W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective-taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 391-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00174
  42. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
  43. Schwepker, C. H., & Cornwell T. B. (1991). An examination of ecologically concerned consumers and their intention to purchase ecologically packaged products. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 10(2), 77-101.
  44. Stephens, S. H. (1985). Attitude toward socially responsible consumption: Development and validation of a scale and investigation of relationships to clothing acquisition and discard behavior. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, The Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia.
  45. Snelgar, R. S. (2006). Egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric environmental concerns: Measurement and structure. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(2), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.06.003
  46. Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
  47. Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x
  48. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientation, Gender and environmental concern. Environmental and Behavior, 25(3), 322-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593255002
  49. Thompson, S. C. G., & Bartin, M. A. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(2), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80168-9
  50. Tucker, L. R., Dolish, J. K., & Wilson, K. L. (1981). Profiling environmentally responsible consumer citizens. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 9(fall), 112-125.
  51. Webster, F. E. Jr. (1975). Determining the characteristics of the socially conscious consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(12), 188-196. https://doi.org/10.1086/208631
  52. Wells, W. D., & Prensky, D. (1996). Consumer behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Cited by

  1. Perceived Value Dimensions of Up-cycling Fashion Goods and the Relationship with Attitude and Purchase Intention - The Moderating Effect of Fashion Innovativeness - vol.39, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2015.39.2.257
  2. Investigating the sustainability of the Korean textile and fashion industry vol.27, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCST-08-2013-0085
  3. The Moderating Effects of Brand Familiarity in the Relationship between Perceived Value of Eco-friendly Apparel Products and Purchase Intention vol.25, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5934/kjhe.2016.25.4.423
  4. Dyeing of Soybean Fabrics using Charcoals vol.18, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2016.18.4.531
  5. Sensibility Preference of Eco-Friendly Fabric Products and Trust Reliability vol.14, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5805/KSCI.2012.14.3.430
  6. A study on the Purchase Appraisal Standard and Post-purchase Satisfaction of Natural Dyeing Products vol.14, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5805/KSCI.2012.14.1.064
  7. Impacts of Ethical Consumption Beliefs on Attitudes toward Eco-Friendly Faux Leather Apparel Products and Mediating Roles of Perceived Consumer Effectiveness and Apparel Environmental Knowledge vol.37, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2013.37.2.125
  8. An Exploration according to Clothing Category for Increasing the Sustainability of Fashion and Textiles vol.15, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2013.15.2.294
  9. Tendency of Consumption and Safety Certification for Infant's Organic Cotton Apparel vol.39, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2015.39.6.924
  10. The Effect of Mordant on the Mechanical Properties and Primary Hand Values of Fabrics Dyed with Bamboo and Pine Leaf Extracts vol.14, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5805/KSCI.2012.14.4.648
  11. The Value, Knowledge, and Sustainable Consumption Behavior of Fashion Consumers vol.37, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2013.37.3.424
  12. Environmental Knowledge, Eco-Friendly Attitude and Purchase Intention about Eco-Friendly Fashion Products of Fashion Consumers vol.16, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2014.16.1.91
  13. Customer Characteristics about Eco-Friendly Apparel Products between 'Environmentally Friendly Group' and 'Non-environmentally Friendly Group' - A Survey of College Students in Daejeon - vol.14, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5805/KSCI.2012.14.5.791
  14. Human Ecology Research (2000-2013) on Sustainable Consumption of Natural Resources vol.53, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2015.007
  15. The Effects of Environmental Claim Types and Consumer Vocabulary on Eco Fashion Advertisement vol.19, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2017.19.2.166
  16. The Effects of Environment-conscious Consumer Attitudes towards Eco-friendly Product and Artificial Leather Fashion Product Purchase Intentions vol.15, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2013.15.1.057
  17. A Study of a Social Content Model for Sustainable Development in the Fast Fashion Industry vol.3, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2012.10593108
  18. Changes in the Adsorption Behavior of Coptidis Rhizoma Dyed Fabrics by Chitosan and Tannin Treatment vol.20, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2018.20.2.210