Search Portals and Academic Libraries: An Analysis of the Book Services and Academic Information Services of Major Search Portals

민간 포털의 책, 전문정보 서비스와 대학도서관 서비스

  • 박소연 (덕성여자대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Published : 2009.09.30


This study aims to perform an evaluation of the book services and academic information services provided by the major search portals of Korea and the United States. This study also investigates the relationships between search portals and academic libraries. The results of this study can be implemented for the development and improvement of the portals' book and academic information services. Users can refer to the results of this study in choosing services from search portals. The results of this study can also provide implications for the differentiation of academic library services.


Search Portals;Book Service;Academic Information Service;Academic Libraries


  1. 송영희, 노진영, 권은경, 윤혜영. 2008. "디지털시대의 장서관리". 서울: 한국도서관협회.
  2. 윤희윤. 2006. "장서관리론". 대구: 태일사.
  3. 조재인, 이지원. 2006. 검색포털과 대학도서관 소장목록 연계방안에 관한 연구. "정보관리연구", 37(2): 75-92.
  4. Newhaus, C., Newhaus, E., Asher, A., & Wrede, C. 2008. “The Depth and breadth of Google Scholar: An empirical study." Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(2): 127-141.
  5. Newhaus, C., Newhaus, E., & Asher, A. 2008. “Google Scholar goes to school: The presence of Google scholar on college and university web sites.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(1): 39-51.
  6. Oder, N. 2005. “Google Scholar links with libraries." Library Journal, 130: 17-18.
  7. Miller, W., & Pellen, R. M, eds. 2006. Libraries and Google. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Information Press.
  8. 이지연, 민지연, 주수형. 2007. 국가지식정보의 유통 현황 분석 및 유통방안에 관한 연구. "정보관리학회지", 24(3): 299-320.
  9. Hartman, K. A., & Mullen, L. B. 2008. “Google Scholar and academic libraries: an update.” New Library World, 109(5/6): 211-222.
  10. 이지연, 박성재. 2005. 검색 포털 시스템의 동향과 발전방향. "정보관리연구", 36(4): 71-89.
  11. 한국도서관협회. 2008."2008한국도서관연감". [서울]: 한국도서관협회.
  12. Vine, R. 2005. “Google Scholar." Journal of Medical Library Association, 94(1): 97-99.
  13. 배희진, 이진숙, 이준호, 박소연. 2004. 국내 웹 디렉토리들의 커버리지 및 커버리지 중복성 분석."정보관리학회지", 21(1): 173-186.
  14. Shroeder, R. 2007. “Pointing users toward citation searching: using Google Scholar and Web of Science." Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 7(2): 223-248.
  15. Baksik, C. 2006. “Fair Use or Exploitation? The Google Book Search Controversy.” Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(4): 399-415.
  16. Henderson, J. 2005. “Google Scholar: A source for clinicians?." Canadian Medical Association Journal, 172(12): 1549-1550.
  17. Johnson, P. 2004. Fundamentals of Collection Development & Management. Chicago: ALA.
  18. Walters, W. 2007. “Google Scholar coverage of multidisciplinary field.” Information Processing & Management, 43(4): 1121-1132.
  19. Jasco, P. 2004. Google Scholar Beta. [online]. [cited 2009.7.26]. .
  20. Jasco, P. 2005. Side-by-Side2: Native Search Engines vs. Google Scholar. [online]. [cited 2009.7.26]. .
  21. Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. 2007. “Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13): 2105-2125.
  22. Robinson, M. L., & Wusterman, J. 2006. “Putting Google Scholar to the test: A preliminary study." Program: electronic library and information systems, 41(1): 71-80.

Cited by

  1. Content Analysis of Dibrary Portal Services vol.28, pp.3, 2011,
  2. A Study on the Quality of Academic Information Service of Internet Portal vol.31, pp.2, 2014,
  3. A Study on Service Integration of Research Information and Dictionary in Portal Site vol.28, pp.1, 2011,