A Study for RDA Implementation Scenarios and Future Bibliographic Control

RDA 구현 시나리오와 서지 제어의 장래에 대한 고찰

  • 조재인 (시립인천전문대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Published : 2009.09.30


Disagreements between the technical environment and the conventional library catalog have caused a re-clarification of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP). Review is under way to finalize the publication of RDA (Resource Description and Access) in late 2009 by the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. The impending RDA is based on FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) which re-explains the bibliographic universe focused on entities, attributes and relationships between resources, but tries to maintain MARC as an encoding format for RDA. In this study, firstly FRBR, ICP and RDA were analyzed. Secondly, we propose 3 scenarios of RDA implementation: the future cataloging system based on the FRBR Entity, using a semantic web structure, and the scenario using the existing MARC format with some small changes. Finally, by examining response patterns of overseas bibliographic institutions, we present a set of urgent issues for future directions of bibliographic contro in Korea which includes, but not limited to, relationship between RDA/FRBR and KCR (Korean Cataloging Rules), continuation of KORMARC and authority control.


  1. 中井万知子. 2008. “国立国会図書館の書誌データの今後: 新方針を策定して." 情報組織化 研究グループ7月月例研究会. [online]. [cited 2009.6.1]. .
  2. Delsey, Tom. 2009. AACR2 versus RDA, CLA Pre-Conference Session: From Rules to Entities: Cataloguing with RDA, 2009. May 29. [online]. [cited.2009.6.1]. .
  3. LC. 2008. Encoding RDA, Resource Description and Access data in MARC 21. MARC DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 2008-DP04. [online]. [cited 2008.12.12]. .
  4. Marcum, Deanna B. 2005. The Future of Cataloging." Ebsco Leadership Seminar. [online]. [cited 2008.10.10]. .
  5. The Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (JSC). 2009. Adopting RDA. [online]. [cited 2009.2.1]. .
  6. University of california library. 2005. Rethinking how we provide bibliographic services for the University of California. [online]. [cited 2009.3.10]..
  7. 谷口祥一. 2007. "FRBR のその後:FRBR 目錄規則?FRBR OPAC." [online]. [cited 2009. 3.10]. .
  8. Danskin, Alan. 2006. Tomorrow Never Knows: the End of Cataloguing? IFLA 2006 Seoul Session: ICABS. 2006. Aug. [online]. [cited 2009.3.10]. .
  9. Cataloging Futures blog. 2009. RDA: Resource Description and Access - more delays. [online]. [cited 2009.6.1]. .
  10. 渡邊隆弘. 2008. “FRBR のとらえる"書誌的世界": FRBROO を中心に.” 情報組織化研究 グループ月例研究会. 2008.3.15. [online]. [cited 2009.4.10]. .
  11. LC. 2000. Bicentennial Conference on Bibliographic Control for the New Millennium: Confronting the Challenges of Networked Resources and the Web. [online]. [cited 2009.1.7]. .
  12. MARBI. 2009. MARC 21 Format 2009 Changes to Accommodate RDA (Draft). [online]. [cited 2009.6.23]. .
  13. Libraries Australia. 2009. Implementation scenarios, encoding structures and display. [online]. [cited 2009.6.23]. .
  14. OCLC. 2005. Perception of Libraries and Information Resources. [online]. [cited 2009.1.3]. .
  15. The Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (JSC). 2008. RDA, FRBR/FRAD, and Implementation Scenarios. [online]. [cited 2009.8]. .
  16. 古川肇. 2009. “RDA 全体草案とその前後.” カレントアウェアネス, No.299. 2009年3月20日. [online]. [cited 2009. 6.7]. .
  17. 안영희, 이성숙. 2009. IFLA FRAD 모형이 관련 표준에 미친 영향 연구. 정보관리학회지, 26(1): 279-303.
  18. Bushman, Barbara. 2009. Testing Resource Description and Access (RDA). Chicago: ALA Annual. July 11. [online]. [cited 2009.8.2]. .
  19. Bibliographical Center for Research. 2009. Changes to MARC Formats Proposed. Weekly e-news alert. 2009.1.30. [online]. [cited 2009.6.1]. .
  20. Block, Rick J. 2009. RDA: Boondoggle or Boon? And What About MARC? [online]. [cited 2009.6.8]. .
  21. Espley, John. 2009. RDA and an ILS: Look Before You Leap Taking RDA for a Test-Drive. Chicago: ALA Annual. July 11. [online]. [cited.8.2]. .
  22. 박진희. 2009. RDA의 제정동향 및 내용구조에 관한 연구. "한국도서관.정보학회지", 40(1): 317-338.
  23. Calhoun, Karen. 2006. The Changing Nature of the Catalog and its Integration with Other Discovery Tools. [online]. [cited 2009.3.10]. .
  24. LC. 2009a. Testing Resource Description and Access (RDA). [online]. [cited 2009.6.1]. .
  25. IFLA. 2009. Statement of International Cataloguing Principles. [online]. [cited 2009.3.10]. .
  26. Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals. 2008. RDA: a cataloguing code for the 21st century. [online]. [cited 2008.12.1]. .
  27. Hillmann, Diane. 2008. Facing Forward: The Challenges Facing Cataloging and Catalogers. [online]. [cited 2008. 12.1]. .
  28. The Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (JSC). 2007. RDA Implementation Scenarios. [online]. [cited 2009.8.1]. .
  29. 渡邊隆弘. 2009. “IFLA"国際目録原則"をめぐって.” 情報組織化研究. 2009.4.18. [online]. [cited 2009.6]. .
  30. LC. 2009b. Identifying work, expression, and manifestation records in the MARC 21 Bibliographic and Authority formats. MARC PROPOSAL NO. 2009-01/3. [online]. [cited 2008. 12.1]. .
  31. Markey, Karen. 2007. The Online Library Catalog: Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained?” D-Lib Magazine, 13(1/2). [online]. [cited 2009.1.5]. .

Cited by

  1. A study on the user evaluation for an RDA-based Korean bibliography retrieval system vol.33, pp.3, 2015,