Studies on Problems and Improvement of Introducing No Wetland Loss

습지총량제 도입에 따른 문제점과 개선방안에 대한 연구

  • Kim, Yoon-Jung (Department of Environment Sciences and Engineering, College of Engineering, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Don (Department of Environment Sciences and Engineering, College of Engineering, Ewha Womans University)
  • 김윤정 (이화여대 공과대학 환경공학과) ;
  • 이상돈 (이화여대 공과대학 환경공학과)
  • Received : 2009.05.13
  • Accepted : 2009.08.11
  • Published : 2009.08.31

Abstract

Wetlands considered to be an important natural resources because they provide biodiversity and habitat for species to breed and survive. In this regard, many countries in the world provide wetlands and have policies and laws to protect them. In Korea we hosted RAMSAR COP-10 at Changwon in 2008 representing Korea's endeavor to wetland protection. But, in the process of development Wetlands are easy target to be lost due its easy access and the laws and regulations to protect them are relatively weak. Thus, this research focused on the introduction of No Wetland Loss(NWL) and we can achieve wetland protection in the economy market ways. Thus, NWL should consider 1) a clear definition of NWL and harmony and consensus of introduction of NWL, 2) considering most wetlands be private we need a financial support for securing wetlands, 3) inventories for wetlands in Korea, draw a line of demarcation, technic to evaluate wetlands, 4) wetland restoration considering function of ecosystem not total amount of wetlands. Wetland protection should be a part of Basic Law of Water Management which in its progress and we need further studies on wetland protection because of watershed management, deserted agricultural paddies, etc.

References

  1. 김귀곤.2005, 첨단환경기술 3월호. 습지총량제도를 도입하자
  2. 방상원, 안선영, 박주현, 2006, 습지보전을위한 정책방안 연구-습지은행제도를 중심으로. KEI 연구보고서 RE-13
  3. 최미희, 조희선, 2008, 습지의 경제적 가치화, 람사르협략 사무국제작, 도서출판따님
  4. Moser K., Ahn G. Noe. 2007, Characterization of microtopography and its influence on vegetation pattems in created wetlands. Wetlands, 27(4), 1081-1097 https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[1081:COMAII]2.0.CO;2
  5. 송인성, 2005, 환경정책과 환경법, 집문당
  6. Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink, 2007, Wetlands
  7. 환경부, 2008, 습지를 찾아서
  8. National Research Council, 2007, Compensating for wetland losses under the Clean Water Act. National Academy Press
  9. Bruland, G. L., and C. J. Richardson, 2005, Hydrologic, edaphic, and vegetative responses to microtopographic reestablish-ment in a restored wetland. restoration ecology, 13, 515-23 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00064.x
  10. 박미영, 2008, 습지의 보전 및 복원계획을 위한 기준습지 선정 방법론 개발에 관한 연구, 서울 대학교 대학원 협동과정 조경학 공학박사학위 논문
  11. UNDP/GEF 국가습지보전사업관리단, 2008, 아시아지역 습지보전을 위한 국제심포지엄 발표자료
  12. 환경부, 2007, UNDP/GEF국가습지보전사업단, 습지총량제 도입방안 구축 사업
  13. 환경부, 해양수산부, 2007, 습지기본계획
  14. 최희선, 2007, 물순환형 생태도시를 위한 유역차원의 습지조성 입지선정에 관한연구-환경생태계획 적용방안을 중심으로, 서울대학교 대학원 협동과정 조경학 전공 공학박사학위논문
  15. Smith, R. D., A. Ammann, C. Bartolodus, and M. M. Brinson, 1995, An Approach for Assessing Wetland Function using Hydrogemorphic Classification, Reference Wetlands, and Functionl Indices, US Army Corps of Engineers Report WRP DE-9. p.10-33
  16. Mitsch, W. J., Wang, L., Zhang, R. Deal, X. Wu, and A. Zuwerink, 2005, Using ecological indicators in a whole ecosystem wetland experinment, 213-37. In Jorgensen, S.E., R. Costanza, and F L., Xu, editors, Handbook of Ecological Indicators for Assessment of Ecosystem Health. Boca Raton, FL, USA Taylor & Francis
  17. 김귀곤.2003. 습지와 환경. 아카데미서적