A Study on the Behaviour of Organics and Nitrogen Using Upflow Anaerobic Reactor When Acid Fermenter is Added

상향류식 혐기성반응조와 산발효조의 병합처리시 유기물질과 질소거동에 관한 연구

  • Oh, Dae-Min (Department of Environmental Engineering, Hanseo University) ;
  • Lee, Young-Shin (Department of Environmental Engineering, Hanseo University)
  • Published : 2009.03.31


This study was aimed to behaviour of organics and nitrogen on the upflow anaerobic reactor when a acid fermenter is added. Up flow anaerobic reactor (UAR) reaction will result which operates, COD removal efficiencies of reactor with nitrate loading rate 0.11, 0.66g/L/d were over 77%, but one with 1.0g/L/d was 73.5%. Especially, on NLR 0.11g/L/d, COD removal was 77% and nitrate removal efficiency was 93% simultaneously. The other side upflow anaerobic reactor and acid fermenter (UAR+AF) reaction will result witch operates, COD removal efficiencies of reactor with nitrate loading rate 0.11, 0.66g/L/d were over 85%, but one with 1.0g/L/d was 80%. Especially, on NLR 0.11g/L/d, COD removal was 85% and nitrate removal efficiency was 98% simultaneously. Also, without in reaction condition increase of influent nitrate concentration resulted in the linear decrease of nitrate removal efficiency and nitrate removal efficiency at influent nitrate-nitrogen 800mg/L was 50%. Alkalinity was increased theoretically by denitrification at low nitrate-N concentration, however, it was not increased theoretically at high nitrate-No 40% nitrate-N of UAR was denitrified until 70% height of reactor and 90% nitrate-N of UAR+AF was denitrified until 30% height of reactor Upflow anaerobic reactor was to occur accumulate acid, which TVA/Alkalinity is 0.3$\sim$0.47. Increase of NLR resulted increase of effluent alkalinity and TVA production


Upflow anaerobic reactor;Acid fermenter;Organic;Denitrification


  1. McCarty P. L., 1964, Anaerobic waste treatment fundamentals Part 1, Public Works, 95, 107-112
  2. Min K.S., Ahn Y. H., Park S. M., 2002, Dilute wastewater treatment using an upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactor, Journal of KSEE, 24(8), 1379-1389
  3. Langenhoff A. A., Stuchey D. C., 2000, Treatment of dilute wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor:effect of low temperature, Water Res., 34(15), 3867-3875
  4. Nachaiyasit S., Stuchey D. C., 1997, Effect of low temperatures on the performance of anaerobic baffled reactor(ABR), Journal of Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 69, 276-284<276::AID-JCTB711>3.0.CO;2-T
  5. Uemura S., Harada H., 2000, Treatment of sewage by a UASB reactor under moderate to low temperature conditions, Bioresour. Technol., 72, 275-282
  6. Singh K. S., Harada H., Viraraghaban T., 1996, Low-strength wastewater treatment by a UASB reactor, Bioresour. Technol., 55(96), 187-194
  7. Song K. B., Bae J. H., Cho K. M., 1996, Operational characteristics of UASB and ABR-I: Organic removal efficiency, Journal of KSEE, 18(2), 159-170
  8. Lee Y. S., Kang S. W., Oh D. M., 2004, Study on removal of organics and denitirification in expanded granular sludge blanket, Journal of korean society of urban environment, 4(1), 35-40
  9. APHA., AWWA., WEF., 1995, Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th ed., APHA, 4-75
  10. 최규철, 권오억, 김동욱, 김용환, 박광하, 이우식, 이징연, 전세진, 정수경, 2004, 수질요염공정시험방법 주해, 동화기술, 788pp
  11. Lee H. M., Yang B. S., 1993, Effect of effluent recycling on the operating performance of UASB reactor, Journal of the environmental science, 2(1), 299-310
  12. Yoon S. Y., Park S. C., 1995, A study on organic matter removal by UASB, Journal of korean solid waste engineering society, 12(4), 450-457
  13. Yu H. Q., Fang H. H. P., Tay J. H., 2001, Enhancement of granulation in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket(UASB) reactors by aluminum chloride, Chemosphere, 44, 31-36
  14. De Smul. A., Goethals L., Verstraete W., 1999, Effect of COD to sulphate ratio and temperature in expanded-granular-sludge-blanket reactors for sulphate reduction, Process BioChemistry, 34(4), 407-416
  15. Ahn Y. H., Min K. S., Yun Z., 2000, Enhancement of reactor performance and pelletization by reactor modification in UASB system, Journal of Environment Science Health, 35(9), 1719-1733