Effect of Dimethylformamide on Post-Thaw Motility, Acrosome Integrity, and DNA Structure of Frozen Boar Sperm

  • Hwang, You-Jin (Division of Biological Science, Gachon University of Medicine and Science) ;
  • Yang, Jae-Hun (Division of Biological Science, Gachon University of Medicine and Science) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Ok (Division of Biological Science, Gachon University of Medicine and Science) ;
  • Kim, Bo-Kyung (Division of Biological Science, Gachon University of Medicine and Science) ;
  • Choi, Seon-Kyu (Division of Biological Science, Gachon University of Medicine and Science) ;
  • Park, Choon-Keun (Department of Animal Biotechnology, College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Dae-Young (Division of Biological Science, Gachon University of Medicine and Science)
  • Published : 2009.12.31

Abstract

The beneficial effect of glycerol as a cryoprotectant, especially for sperm cryopreservation, has been shown in many studies. However, glycerol is toxic to living cells, and boar sperm in particular show greater sensitivity to glycerol than sperm from other domestic animals. Amides have been studied as alternative cryoprotectants for freezing stallion sperm. Sperm frozen in methylformamide or dimethylformamide as cryoprotectants show similar motility when thawed compared with sperm frozen in glycerol. We evaluated the cryoprotective effects of dimethylformamide on boar sperm freezing. To test the effect of amides, the concentration of boar semen was adjusted to $10^9sperm/mL$, and seminal plasma was removed using Hulsen solution. After centrifugation, the pellet was diluted in modified-Modena B extender. Lactose-egg yolk (LEY) extender was used as the cooling extender. The freezing extender was madeed aaddition of the optimal amount of glycerol and amides to LEY-Glycerol-Orvus ES Paste extender, and this extender was used for the second dilution. Diluted sperm were frozen in liquid nitrogen using the 0.5 mL straw method. Sperm frozen in extender with glycerol as a cderol were compared with those frozen in extender including the different amides. Sperm were tested for motility, viability, the sperm chromatin structure assay, and normal apical ridge after thawing. The percent of motile sperm diluted in glycerol was as high as that in the stallion study (61%). Dimethylformamide showed positive effects on sperm quality and was better than glycerol. Methylformamide provided similar sperm quality as glycerol. Therefore, dimethylformamide is useful for reducing cryoinjury in boar sperm and is expected to be useful as an alternative cryoprotectant.

References

  1. Almlid T and Johnson LA. 1988. Effects of glycerol concentration, equilibration time and temperature of glycerol addition on post-thaw viability of boar spermatozoa frozen in straws. J. Anim Sci. 66:2899-2905
  2. Bailey JL, Lessard C, Jacques J, Breque C, Dobrinski I, Zeng W and Galantino-Homer HL. 2008. Cryopreservation of boar semen and its future importance to the industry. Theriogenology. 70:1251-1259 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.06.014
  3. Buhr MM, Fiser P, Bailey JL, and Curtis EF. 2001. Cryopreservation in different concentrations of glycerol alters boar sperm and their membranes. J. Androl. 22:961-969 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2001.tb03436.x
  4. Carvajal G, Cuello C, Ruiz M, Vazquez JM, Martinez EA, and Roca J. 2004. Effects of centrifugation before freezing on boar sperm cryosurvival. J. Androl. 25:389-396 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02805.x
  5. Check ML, Check DJ, Check JH, Long R and Press M. 1994. Effect of shortened exposure time to the critical period for ice crystal formation on subsequent post-thaw semen parameters from cryopreserved sperm. Arch. Androl. 32:63-67 https://doi.org/10.3109/01485019408987769
  6. Cordova-Izquierdo A, Oliva JH, Lleo B, Garcia-Artiga C, Corcuera BD and Perez-Gutierrez JF. 2006. Effect of different thawing temperatures on the viability, in vitro fertilizing capacity and chromatin condensation of frozen boar semen packaged in 5 ml straws. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 92:145- 154 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.05.011
  7. Cotton LM, Rodriguez CM, Suzuki K, Orgebin-Crist MC and Hinton BT. 2010. Organic cation/carnitine transporter, OCTN2, transcriptional activity is regulated by osmotic stress in epididymal cells. Mol Reprod Dev. 77:114-125 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.21122
  8. Fahy GM. 1986. The relevance of cryoprotectant toxicity to cryobiology. Cryobiology 23:1-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(86)90013-1
  9. Fiser PS and Fairfull RW. 1990. Combined effect of glycerol concentration and cooling velocity on motility and acrosomal integrity of boar spermatozoa frozen in 0.5ml straws. Mol Reprod. 25:123-129 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080250204
  10. Fiser PS, Fairfull RW, Hansen C, Panich PL, Shrestha JN and Underhill L. 1993. The effect of warming velocity on motility and acrosomal integrity of boar sperm as influenced by the rate of freezing and glycerol level. Mol. Reprod. 34:190-195 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080340211
  11. Garner DL, Johnson LA, Yue ST, Roth BL and Haugland RP. 1994. Dual DNA staining assessment of bovine sperm viability using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide. J. Androl. 15:620-629
  12. Graham JK, Kunze E and Hammerstedt RH. 1990. Analysis of sperm cell viability, acrosomal integrity, and mitochondrial function using flow cytometry. Biol. Reprod. 43:55-64 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod43.1.55
  13. Grossfeld R, Sieg B, Struckmann C, Frenzel A, Maxwell WM and Rath D. 2008. New aspects of boar semen freezing strategies. Theriogenology. 2008 70:1225-1233 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.017
  14. Hammerstedt RH and Graham JK. 1992. Cryopreservation of poultry sperm: the enigma of glycerol. Cryobiology. 29:26-38 https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(92)90004-L
  15. Holt WV. 2000. Basic aspects of frozen storage of semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 18:62:3-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00152-4
  16. Johnson LA, Weitze KF, Fiser P and Maxwell WM. 2000. Storage of boar semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 62:143-72. Review https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00157-3
  17. Koshimoto C, Mazur P. 2002. Effects of warming rate, temperature, and antifreeze proteins on the survival of mouse spermatozoa frozen at an optimal rate. Cryobiology. 45:49-59 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-2240(02)00105-0
  18. Kumar S, Millar JD and Watson PF. 2003. The effect of cooling rate on the survival of cryopreserved bull, ram, and boar spermatozoa: a comparison of two controlled-rate cooling machines. Cryobiology. 46:246-253 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-2240(03)00040-3
  19. Lee SH, Cheong HT, Yang BK and Park CK. 2005. Development of semen extenders by assessment of sperm viability in miniature-pig semen. Reprod. Dev. Biol. 29:247-252
  20. Medrano A, Holt WV and Watson PF. 2009. Controlled freezing studies on boar sperm cryopreservation. Andrologia. 41: 246-250 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.2009.00927.x
  21. Pukazhenthi B, Noiles E, Pelican K, Donoghue A, Wildt D and Howard J. 2000. Osmotic effects on feline spermatozoa from normospermic versus teratospermic donors. Cryobiology. 40:139-150 https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.2000.2233
  22. Purdy PH, Song Y, Silversides FG and Blackburn HD. 2009. Evaluation of glycerol removal techniques, cryoprotectants, and insemination methods for cryopreserving rooster sperm with implications of regeneration of breed or line or both. Poult. Sci. 88:2184-2191 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00402
  23. Rath D, Bathgate R, Rodriguez-Martinez H, Roca J, Strzezek J and Waberski D. 2009. Recent advances in boar semen cryopreservation. Soc. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 66:51-66
  24. Squires EL, Keith SL and Graham JK. 2004. Evaluation of alternative cryoprotectants for preserving stallion spermatozoa. Theriogenology 62:1056-1065 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.12.024