DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Suitability of Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) Hay as a Supplement to Fresh Grass in Dairy Cows

  • Scharenberg, A. ;
  • Kreuzer, M. ;
  • Dohme, Frigga
  • Received : 2008.12.04
  • Accepted : 2009.04.10
  • Published : 2009.07.01

Abstract

Two experiments were carried out to determine the utility of sainfoin hay, a temperate tanniferous forage legume, as a dietary supplement for grass-fed cows. The condensed tannins (CT) of sainfoin might counteract the typical metabolic ammonia load of cows in intensive grazing systems. Furthermore, the physical fibrousness of sainfoin might improve ruminal pH stability. In the preliminary experiment, the eating rate of non-lactating Holstein cows of two tanniferous hays, sainfoin and birdsfoot trefoil, was compared to that of a grass-clover hay after specific periods of time (n = 4). The eating rate of sainfoin was superior to that of the other forages. In the main experiment, designed as a replicated 3${\times}$3 Latin square, six ruminally-cannulated, lactating Red Holstein cows received grass, concentrate and either no supplementation, 3 kg/d of grass hay or 3 kg/d of sainfoin hay (n = 6). Measured intakes of the grass hay and the sainfoin hay were 2.0 and 1.5 kg DM, and two cows entirely refused to eat the sainfoin hay and had to be excluded from data analysis. Grass DMI was similar for cows supplemented with sainfoin hay and cows fed only grass whereas intake of concentrate was higher (p<0.01) for the latter treatment. Continuous measurement of ruminal pH showed that the minimum pH at night tended to be lower (p<0.10) with grass-only feeding compared to sainfoin supplementation, but pH did not decline below the threshold of subacute acidosis for a longer period of time. The slightly higher intake of nitrogen (N) for cows supplemented with sainfoin hay (413 g/d) compared to cows fed only grass (399 g/d) was accompanied by an increased (p<0.05) fecal N excretion and a tendency for an increased (p<0.10) urinary N excretion. Ruminal ammonia concentration, as well as plasma and milk urea, were not affected by sainfoin supplementation. In conclusion, the lack of positive effects typical for CT might be explained either by the limited CT content of this plant species (55 g/kg DM) or the relatively low proportion of sainfoin in the total diet or both. Moreover, due to the unexpected low grass quality, the general ammonia load might have been too low for CT to have an impact.

Keywords

Condensed Tannins;Dairy Cows;Nitrogen Balance;Ruminal pH;Sainfoin

References

  1. Bargo, F., L. D. Muller, E. S. Kolver and J. E. Delahoy. 2003. Invited review: Production and digestion of supplemented dairy cows on pasture. J. Dairy Sci. 86:1-42 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73581-4
  2. Butter, N. L., J. M. Dawson and P. J. Buttery. 1999. Effects of dietary tannins on ruminants. In: Secondary plant products. Antinutritional and beneficial actions in animal feeding (Ed. J. C. Cargill and I. Mueller-Harvey). Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK. pp. 51-70
  3. H$\ddot{a}$ring, D. A., D. Suter, N. Amrhein and A. Lüscher. 2007. Biomass allocation is an important determinant of the tannin concentration in growing plants. Ann. Bot. 99:111-120 https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl227
  4. Mould, F. L., E. R. Orskov and S. O. Mann. 1983. Associative effects of mixed feeds. I. Effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 10:15-30 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(83)90003-2
  5. O'Grady, L., M. L. Doherty and F. J. Mulligan. 2008. Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) in grazing Irish dairy cows. Vet. J. 176:44-49 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.12.017
  6. Plaizier, J. C. 2004. Replacing chopped alfalfa hay with alfalfa silage in barley grain and alfalfa based total mixed rations for lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 87:2495-250 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73374-3
  7. Provenza, F. D. 1995. Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants. J. Range Manage. 48:2-17 https://doi.org/10.2307/4002498
  8. Rutter, S. M., R. A. Champion and P. D. Penning. 1997. An automatic system to record foraging behaviour in free-ranging ruminants. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 54:185-195 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01191-4
  9. Min, B. R., T. N. Barry, G. T. Attwood and W. C. McNabb. 2003. The effect of condensed tannins on the nutrition and health of ruminants fed fresh temperate forages: a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 106:3-19 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00041-5
  10. Jones, W. T. and J. L. Mangan. 1977. Complexes of condensed tannins of sainfoin (Onobrychis-Viciifolia Scop) with fraction 1 leaf protein and with submaxillary mucoprotein, and their reversal by polyethylene glycol and pH. J. Sci. Food Agric. 28:126-136 https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740280204
  11. Hervas, G., P. Frutos, G. Ramos, F. J. Giraldez and A. R. Mantecon. 2004. Intraruminal administration of two doses of quebracho tannins to sheep: effect on rumen degradation and total tract digestibility, faecal recovery and toxicity. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 13:111-120
  12. Kariuki, I. W. and B. W. Norton. 2008. The digestion of dietary protein bound by condensed tannins in the gastro-intestinal tract of sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 142:197-209 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.08.006
  13. Niven, S. J., J. D. Beal and P. H. Brooks. 2004. The simultaneous determination of short chain fatty acid, monosaccharides and ethanol in fermented liquid pig diets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 117:339-345 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.09.003
  14. Rutter, S. M. 2000. Graze: A program to analyze recordings of the jaw movements of ruminants. Behav. Res. Methods Ins. C. 32:86-92 https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200791
  15. Balch, C. C. 1971. Proposal to use time spent chewing as an index of extent to which diets for ruminants possess physical property of fibrousness characteristic of roughages. Br. J. Nutr. 26:383-392 https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19710045
  16. FIL-IDF (International Dairy Federation). 2000. Determination of milk fat, protein and laktose content. Guidance on the operation of mid-infrared instruments. Joint IDF/ISO/AOAC International Standard. Description/principle: IR spectrometric. Brussels, Belgium
  17. Mertens, D. R. 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylasetreated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: Collaborative study. J. AOAC Int. 85:1217-1240
  18. Graf, C. M., M. Kreuzer and F. Dohme. 2005. Effects of supplemental hay and corn silage versus full-time grazing on ruminal pH and chewing activity of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 88:711-725 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72735-1
  19. Barry, T. N. and W. C. McNabb. 1999. The implications of condensed tannins on the nutritive value of temperate forages fed to ruminants. Br. J. Nutr. 81:263-272
  20. Kunerth, W. H. and V. L. Youngs. 1984. Modification of anthrone, carbazole, and orcinol reactions for quantification of monosaccharides. Cereal Chem. 61:344-349
  21. SAS Institute. 2004. SAS/STAT 9.1 User's Guide. SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC, USA
  22. ALP (Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux). 2007. F$\ddot{u}$tterungsempfehlungen und N$\ddot{a}$hrwerttabellen f$\ddot{u}$r Wiederk$\ddot{a}$uer. Online-edition. Forschungsanstalt Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux ALP, Posieux, Switzerland
  23. Meyer, R. M., E. E. Bartley, J. L. Morrill and W. E. Stewart. 1964. Salivation in cattle. I. Feed and animal factors affecting. Salivation and its relation to bloat. J. Dairy Sci. 47:1339-1345 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(64)88915-3
  24. Krebs, G. L., D. M. Howard and K. Dods. 2007. The effects of feeding Acacia salinga on feed intake, nitrogen balance and rumen metabolism in sheep. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20:1367-1373
  25. Dohme, F., C. M. Graf, Y. Arrigo, U. Wyss and M. Kreuzer. 2007. Effect of botanical characteristics, growth stage and method of conservation on factors related to the physical structure of forage - An attempt towards a better understanding of the effectiveness of fibre in ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 138:205-227 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.11.003
  26. AOAC. 1995. Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA
  27. Beauchemin, K. A., W. Z. Yang and L. M. Rode. 2003. Effects of particle size of alfalfa-based dairy cow diets on chewing activity, ruminal fermentation, and milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 86:630-643 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73641-8
  28. Clark, D. A. and V. R. Kanneganti. 1998. Grazing management systems for dairy cattle. In: Grass for dairy cattle (Ed. J. H. Cherney and D. J. R. Cherney). CABI Publishing, New York, NY, USA. pp. 311-334
  29. Scharenberg, A., Y. Arrigo, A. Gutzwiller, C. R. Soliva, U. Wyss, M. Kreuzer and F. Dohme. 2007a. Palatability in sheep and in vitro nutritional value of dried and ensiled sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus), and chicory (Cichorium intybus). Arch. Anim. Nutr. 61:481-496 https://doi.org/10.1080/17450390701664355
  30. Dumont, B. and M. Petit. 1995. An indoor method for studying the preferences of sheep and cattle at pasture. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 46:67-80 https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(96)81085-9
  31. Mueller-Harvey, I. 2006. Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health. J. Sci. Food Agric. 86:2010-2037 https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2577
  32. Barry, T. N. and S. J. Duncan. 1984. The role of condensed tannins in the nutritional value of lotus pedunculatus for sheep. 1. voluntary intake. Br. J. Nutr. 51:485-491 https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19840054

Cited by

  1. Morphology, tannin concentration and forage value of 15 Swiss accessions of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) as influenced by harvest time and cultivation site vol.66, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00811.x
  2. ) accessions vol.70, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12125
  3. Inclusion of sainfoin ( Onobrychis viciifolia ) silage in dairy cow rations affects nutrient digestibility, nitrogen utilization, energy balance, and methane emissions vol.99, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10583
  4. Effect of exchanging Onobrychis viciifolia and Lotus corniculatus for Medicago sativa on ruminal fermentation and nitrogen turnover in dairy cows vol.99, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9911
  5. Sainfoin production in western Canada: A review of agronomic potential and environmental benefits vol.74, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12403