DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Fermented Total Mixed Ration and Cracked Cottonseed on Milk Yield and Milk Composition in Dairy Cows

  • Wongnen, C. (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Wachirapakorn, C. (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Patipan, C. (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Panpong, D. (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Kongweha, K. (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology-Isan) ;
  • Namsaen, N. (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Gunun, P. (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Yuangklang, C. (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology-Isan)
  • 투고 : 2008.12.04
  • 심사 : 2009.05.22
  • 발행 : 2009.12.01

초록

Four lactating Holstein Friesian crossbred cows, with an average initial weight of 450 kg, 48${\pm}$12 days in milk and initial milk yield of 18 kg/h/d, were randomly arranged according to a 2${\times}$2 factorial arrangement in a 4${\times}$4 in Latin square design with 21-d period to investigate the effects of type of total mixed ration (TMR) and type of whole cottonseed (WCS) on intake, digestibility and milk production. The dietary treatments were i) TMR and WCS supplementation at 0.5 kg/h/d, ii) TMR and cracked WCS (cWCS) supplementation at 0.5 kg/h/d, iii) fermented TMR (FTMR) and WCS supplementation at 0.5 kg/h/d, and iv) FTMR and cWCS supplementation at 0.5 kg/h/d. Voluntary feed intake was 15.9, 15.2, 15.4 and 15.6 kg DM/d in dietary treatment 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Digestibility of DM, OM, CP, EE, NDF and ADF were not significantly different among dietary treatments. Ruminal pH, $NH_{3}-N$ and volatile fatty acids in the rumen were also not significantly different among type of TMR or type of WCS. Blood urea-N concentration was not significantly different among dietary treatments. Ruminal bacteria population tended to increase but ruminal protozoa population tended to decrease with supplementation of cWCS, but they were not affected by FTMR. Milk yield and 3.5% FCM were not statistically different among treatments (16.6, 16.2, 17.0, 16.3 kg/d and 18.0, 18.6, 19.9 and 19.0 kg/d, respectively). Milk composition was not significantly different among dietary treatments. However, unsaturated fatty acids in milk fat in cows fed FTMR were lower (p<0.05) than in cows fed TMR. In conclusion, fermentation is a conceivable method to improve the quality of TMR for long-time storage and the cracking method is suitable to release the fat from cottonseed for enhancing fatty acid deposition in milk. Thus, the combination of FTMR and cWCS supplementation would be an alternative strategy to improve performance of lactating cows.

키워드

Fermented Total Mixed Ration;Whole Cottonseed;Dairy Cow

참고문헌

  1. AOCS. 1998. Determination of free gossypol. Official Method. Ba 7-58 in Official and Tentative Method of Analysis. 3rd Edition. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. Champaign, IL
  2. Baldwin, R. L. and M. J. Allison. 1983. Rumen metabolism. J. Anim. Sci. 57:461
  3. Bremner, J. M. and D. R. Keeney. 1965. Steam distillation methods of determination of ammonium, nitrate and nitrite. Anal. Chem. Acta. 32:218
  4. Dayani, O., G. R. Ghorbani, M. Alikhani, H. R. Rahmani and P. S. Mir. 2007. Effects of dietary whole cottonseed and crude protein level on rumen protozoa population and fermentation parameters. Small Rumin. Res. 69:36 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.12.007
  5. Machmuller, A. and M. Kreuzer. 1999. Methane suppression by coconut oil and associated effects on nutrient and energy balance in sheep. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 79:65 https://doi.org/10.4141/A98-079
  6. NRC. 2001. Nutrient requirements for dairy cattle. $7^{th}$ revised edition, National Academic Press, Washington, DC
  7. Puschner, B. 2000. Feeding cottonseed to dairy cattle. California Animal Health and Food Safety, USA
  8. Randel, R. D., C. C. Jr. Chase and S. J. Wyse. 1992. Effect of gossypol and cotton production on reproduction of mammals. J. Anim. Sci. 70:1628
  9. Risco, C. A., C. A. Holmberg and A. Kutches. 1992. Effect of graded concentrations of gossypol on calf performance: Toxicological and pathological considerations. J. Dairy Sci. 75:2787 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)78042-4
  10. Santos, J. E. P., M. Villasenor, E. J. DePeters, P. H. Robinson and B. C. Baldwin. 2002. Type of cottonseed and level of gossypol in diets of lactating cows: Effects on lactation performance and plasma gossypol. J. Dairy Sci. 85:1491 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74218-5
  11. Yuangklang, C., K. Vasupen, S. Wittyakun, P. Srinanaun and C. Sukho. 2004. Effect of total mixed ration and fermented total mixed ration on feed intake, ruminal fermentation, nutrient digestibility and blood metabolites in dairy cows. In: Proceeding of the $11^{th}$ AAAP Congress 'New Dimensions and challenges for sustainable livestock farming' The Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  12. Beede, D. K. and R. J. Collier. 1986. Potential nutritional strategies for intensively managed cattle during thermal stress. J. Anim. Sci. 62:543
  13. Dhiman, T. R., L. D. Satter, M. W. Pariza, M. P. Galli, K. Albridht and M. X. Tolosa. 2000. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) content of milk from cows offered diets rich in linoleic and linolenic acid. J. Dairy Sci. 83:1016 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74966-6
  14. Wachirapakorn, C., T. Puramongkol and V. Seepuang. 1997. Total mixed ration (TMR) or complete ration (CR) for dairy cows. J. Dairy Cows. 5:53
  15. Calhoun, M. C., S. W. Kuhlmann and B. C. Baldwin. 1995. Cotton feed product composition and gossypol availability and toxicity. In: Proceeding 2nd Natl. Alternative Feeds Symp. pp. 125-146. Missouri, Columbia
  16. Vasupen, K., C. Yuangklang, S. Witayakun and P. Srinanuan. 2005. Effect of difference moisture on quality of fermented total mixed ration. In: Proceedings of the Technical Conference of $43^{rd}$ Kasetsart University, Bangkok
  17. Smith, N. E., L. S. Collar, D. L. Bath, W. L. Dunkley and A. A. Franke. 1981. Digestibility and effect of whole cotton feed to lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 64:2209 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(81)82831-7
  18. Metcalfe, L. D., A. A. Schmitz and J. R. Pelka. 1966. Rapid preparation of fatty acid esters from lipids for gas chromatographic analysis. Anal. Chem. 38:514 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60235a044
  19. Vasupen, K., C. Yuangklang, C. Sarnklong, S. Wongsuthavas, J. Mitchaothai and P. Srenanul. 2006. Effects of total mixed ration and fermented total mixed ration on voluntary feed intake, digestion nutrients digestibility, and milk production in lactating dairy cows. In: Proceedings of the Technical Conference of $44^{th}$ Kasetsart University, Bangkok
  20. Osland, R. B. and E. P. Wagner. 1985. Apparent digestibility of linted vs. delinted whole cottonseed for dairy cows, Fresno State University Bulletin. Fresno, CA, USA
  21. Pantoja, J., J. L. Firkins, M. L. Eastridge and B. L. Hull. 1994. Effects of fat saturation and source of fiber on site of nutrient digestion and milk production by lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 77:2341 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77177-0
  22. Zinn, R. A. and F. N. Owens. 1986. A rapid procedure for purine measurement and its use for estimating net ruminal protein synthesis. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 66:157 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas86-017
  23. Sullivan, J. L., J. T. Huber, R. L. Price and J. M. Harper. 1993b. Comparison of digestibility, nutritive value, and storage characteristics of different forms of cottonseed in diets fed to lactating dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2837
  24. Nelson, G. J. 1975. Isolation and purification of lipids from animal tissues. In: Analysis of lipids and lipoproteins (Ed. E. G. Perkins). AOCS, Champaign, USA
  25. Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York
  26. Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis (Apparatus, reagent, procedures and some application). Agric. Handbook. No. 397, ARS, USDA, Washiton, DC
  27. Chen, X. B. and M. J. Gomes. 1995. Estimation of microbial protein supply to sheep and cattle based on urinary excretion of purine derivatives- an overview of the technical details. International Feed Resources Unit, The Rowett Research Institute. Occational Publication
  28. Galyean, M. 1989. Laboratory procedure in animal nutrition research. Department of Animal and Range Sciences. New Mexico State University, New Mexico
  29. Bertrand, J. A., T. Q. Sudduth, A. Condon, T. C. Jenskins and M. C. Calhoun. 2005. Nutrient content of whole cottonseed. J. Dairy Sci. 88:1470 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72815-0
  30. Crocker, C. L. 1967. Rapid determination of urea nitrogen in serum or plasma without deproteinization. Am. J. Med. Technol. 33:361 https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-265X(84)90086-9
  31. SAS. 1996. SAS/STAT user's guide (Release 6.12). SAS Inst. Inc.,Cary, NC
  32. Sullivan, J. L., J. T. Huber and J. M. Harper. 1993a. Performance of dairy cows fed short staple, Pima, and cracked Pima cottonseed and feed characteristics. J. Dairy Sci. 76:355
  33. Wanapat, M., K. Sommart and K. Saardrak. 1996. Cottonseed meal supplementation of dairy cattle fed rice straw. Available from: http://www.fao.org/ag/aga/agap/frg/lrrd/lrrd8/3/metha 83.htm
  34. Hawkins, E. E., J. E. Meeder, F. G. Owen and S. R. Lowery. 1984. Optimizing soybean utilization in dairy rations. J. Dairy Sci. 67:125
  35. Brown, W., M. DeLuna, O. Lough and R. Swingle. 1982. Long staple cottonseed compares favorably with short staple seed in University of Arizona dairy feeding trial. Arizona Dairy Newsletter, September 3, Tucson, AZ, USA
  36. Jenkins, T. C. 1993. Lipid metabolism in the rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 76:3851 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77727-9
  37. Pires, A. V., M. L. Eastridge, J. L. Firkins and Y. C. Lin. 1997. Effects of heat treatment and physical processing of cottonseed on nutrient digestibility and production performance by lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 80:1685 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76100-9
  38. Satter, L. D. and L. L. Slyter. 1974. Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro. Br. J. Nutr. 32:199 https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19740073
  39. Jenkins, T. C. and D. L. Palmquist. 1983. The effect of long chain fatty acid composition on soluble metabolite levels in semicontinuous in vitro cultures. J. Dairy Sci. 66:154
  40. Prieto, J. G., E. J. DePeters, P. H. Robinson, J. E. P. Santos, J. W. Pareas, S. J. Taylor and M. C. Calhoun. 2003. Increasing dietary levels of processed Pima cottonseed increase plasma gossypol but do not influence productive performance of lactating Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 86:254 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73604-2
  41. Coppock, C. E., J. R. Moya, J. W. West, D. H. Nave and J. M. Labore. 1985. Effect of lint on whole cottonseed passage and digestibility and diet choice on intake of whole cottonseed by Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 68:1198 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)80947-4
  42. Mena, H., J. E. P. Santos, J. T. Huber, J. M. Simas, M. Tarazon and M. C. Calhoun. 2001. The effects of feeding varying amounts of gossypol from whole cottonseed and cottonseed meal in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 84:2231 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74670-X
  43. Van Soest, P. J. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. $2^{nd $ edition, Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York

피인용 문헌

  1. Estratégia de nutrientes para ovinos em distintas sequências de fornecimento alimentar em dieta a base de palma forrageira vol.15, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-99402014000200015
  2. Effects of forage ensiling and ration fermentation on total mixed ration pH, ruminal fermentation and performance of growing Holstein-Zebu cross steers vol.88, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12797