DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

돼지 뒷다리 주요 근육과 등심근육으로 제조된 햄의 품질 특성

성필남;조수현;김진형;하경희;박범영;김동훈;이종문;안종남
Seong, Pil-Nam;Cho, Soo-Hyun;Kim, Jin-Hyoung;Hah, Kyoung-Hee;Park, Beom-Young;Kim, Dong-Hoon;Lee, Jong-Moon;Ahn, Chong-Nam

  • 발행 : 2008.06.30

초록

돼지 뒷다리 부위 주요 근육 4개와 등심 근육으로 제조 된 햄의 이화학적 특성과 관능적 특성을 비교한 결과, 햄 제조에 사용된 원료육의 pH는 Longissimus 근육과 다른 4개의 뒷다리 부위 근육들 간에 차이가 없었으나 햄 제품의 pH에서는 Longissimus 근육 햄에 비해 Rectus femoris 근육 햄이 유의적으로 높은 pH를 나타내었으며(p<0.05), Longissimus 근육 햄의 pH 값이 가장 낮았다(p<0.05). 일반성분을 비교한 결과, 단백질 함량에서만 Longissimus 햄이 Rectus femoris, Semimembranosus, Gluteus medius 근육으로 제조된 햄보다 유의적으로 높았다(p<0.05). 제품색 특성 중 Hunter L 값은 Longissimus dorsi 근육이 가장 높았으며, Rectus femoris, Gluteus medius 근육이 가장 낮은 수치를 나타내었다(p<0.05). Hunter a값은 Rectus femoris, Biceps femoris, Gluteus medius 근육으로 제조된 햄들이 비슷한 수준을 나타내었으며, Longissimus 근육 햄에서 가장 낮았다(p<0.05). 조직감을 조사한 결과, 경도, 탄력성, 응집성, 검성, 씹힘성 모두 근육에 따른 차이가 발견되지않았다(p>0.05). 근육 햄들의 관능적 특성을 조사한 결과, 육안적 색도, 맛, 조직감은 근육간 차이가 없었으며(p>0.05), 풍미는 Semimembranosus 근육으로 제조된 햄이 가장 높은 점수를 받았고, Gluteus medius 근육으로 제조된 햄이 가장 낮았다(p<0.05).

키워드

quality attributes;muscle hams;hind leg;Longissimus dorsi

참고문헌

  1. Karlsson, A., Enfält, a. Ch., Essen-Gustavson, B., Lundstrom, K., Rydhamer, L., and Stern, S. (1993) Muscle histochemical and biochemical properties in relation to meat quality during selection for increased lean tissue growth rate in pigs. J. Anim Sci. 71, 930-938
  2. Payne, C. A., Hunt, M. C., Warren, K. E., Hayden, J. M., Williams, J. E., and Hedrick, H. B. (1992) Histochemical properties of four bovine muscles as influenced by compensatory gain and growth impetus. In Proceedings of the 38th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology. (pp. 121-124) Clermont-Ferrand, France
  3. Shackelford, S. D., Wheeler, T. L., and Koohmaraie, M. (1995) Relationship between shear force and trained sensory panel tenderness ratings of 10 major muscles from Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle. J. Anim Sci. 73, 3333-3340 https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.73113333x
  4. Stanley, D. W. and Swatland, H. J. (1976) The microstructure of muscle tissue-A basis for meat structure measurement. J. Texture Studies 7, 65-70 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.1976.tb01382.x
  5. Wiklund, E., Malmfors, G., and Lundström, K. (1998) The effects of exercise on muscle fiber composition and oxidative capacity in eight bovine skeletal muscles. Swedish J. Agric Res. 28, 111-116
  6. Topel, D. G., Mrekel, D. L., Mackintosh, D. L. and Hall, J. L. (1966) Variation of some physical and biochemical properties within and among selected porcine muslces. J. Anim. Sci. 25, 277-282 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1966.252277x
  7. Henning, W. R., Moody, W. G. and Kemp, J. D. (1973) Characteristics of hams and loins from high and low cutability pork carcasses. J. Anim. Sci. 36, 1063-1068 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1973.3661063x
  8. Bouton, P. E., Harris, P. V., and Shorthose, W. R. (1975) Possible relationships between shear, tensile and adhesion properties of meat texture. J. Texture Studies 5, 297-303
  9. Johnson, R. C., Chen, C. M., Muller, T. S., Costello, W. J., Romans, J. R., and Jones, K. W. (1988) Characterization of the muscles within the beef forequarter. J. Food Sci. 53, 1247-1250 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb09249.x
  10. Patterson, B. C. and Parrish, F. C. (1986) A sensory panel and chemical analysis of certain beef chuck muscles. J. Food Sci. 51, 876-879, 896 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1986.tb11189.x
  11. Harris, P. V. and Shorthose, W. R. (1988) Meat texture. In R. Lawrie (Ed.), Developments in meat science (pp. 245-290). London and New York: Elsevier Applied Science
  12. Dransfield, E. (1977) Intramuscular composition and texture of beef muscles. J. Sci. Food Agric. 28, 833-842 https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740280910
  13. Harris, P. V. (1976) Structural and other aspects of meat tenderness. J. Texture Studies 7, 49-54 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.1976.tb01381.x
  14. Nold, R. A., Romans, J. R., Costello, W. J., and Libal, G. W. (1999) Characterization of muscles from boars, barrows, and gilts slaughtered at 100 or 110 kilograms: Differences in fat, moisture, color, water-holding capacity, and collagen. J. Anim Sci. 77, 1746-1754 https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.7771746x
  15. AOAC (2000) Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, chapter 39. pp. 1-8
  16. Kapasalis, J. G. and Szczesniak, A. S. (1976) Instrumental testing of meat texture-Comments on the past, present and future. J. Texture Studies 6, 297-302
  17. Prusa, K. J., Love, J. A., and Christian, L. L. (1989) Fat content and sensory analysis of selected pork muscles taken from carcasses with various backfat levels. J. Food Qual. 12, 135-143 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4557.1989.tb00316.x
  18. Von Seggern, D. D., Calkins, C. R., Johnson, D. D., Brickler, J. E., and Gwartney, B. L. (2005) Muscle profiling: Characterizing the muscles of the beef chuck and round. Meat Sci. 71, 39-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.010
  19. Briskey, E. J., Hoekstra, W. G., Bray, R. W., and Grummer, R. H. (1960) A comparison of certain physical and chemical characteristics of eight pork muscles. J. Anim. Sci. 19, 214-225 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1960.191214x
  20. Voisey, P. W. (1976) Engineering assessment and critique of instruments used for meat tenderness evaluation. J. Texture Studies 7, 11-17 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.1976.tb01380.x
  21. Rhee, M. S., Wheeler, T. L., Shackelford, S. D., and Koohmaraie, M. (2004) Variation in palatability and biochemical traits within and among eleven beef muscles. J. Anim. Sci. 82, 534-550
  22. SAS (1996) SAS/STAT Software for PC. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA
  23. Carmack, C. F., Kastner, C. L., Dikeman, M. E., Schwenke, J. R., and Garcia Zepeda, C. M. (1995) Sensory evaluation of beef-flavor-intensity, tenderness, and juiciness among major muscles. Meat Sci. 39, 143-147 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(95)80016-6
  24. Warner, R. D., Kauffman, R. G., and Russell, R. L. (1993) Quality attributes of major porcine muscles: A comparison with the longissimus lumborum. Meat Sci. 33, 359-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(93)90007-5

피인용 문헌

  1. Quality Characteristics of Dry-cured Ham Made fromTwo Different Three-way Crossbred Pigs vol.29, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2008.28.2.160