Empirical Research to Understand the User Perception and Requirement of Library 2.0

라이브러리 2.0에 대한 이용자 인식 및 요구사항에 관한 실증적 연구

  • 이지연 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 민지연 (연세대학교 대학원 문헌정보학과)
  • Published : 2008.03.30


In this study, we wanted to find out about the perceptions and the requirements of the academic information service users about the Library 2.0. This study used the survey research method, which utilized the web-based survey using the academic information service users as the target population. Specifically, we studied whether and how the users recognized and experienced the Web 2.0 technologies and its related services with respect to Library 2.0. In addition, we gathered the requirements for the Library 2.0 concept applied information services. The analysis results showed that the users were in need of obtaining the most up-to-date information and also using the professional information services such as the experts generated information contents and the Google Scholar type document reference information services instead of the Library 2.0 services based on the Web 2.0 technologies.


Library 2.0;User Study;Library Services;Web 2.0


  1. 이재윤. 2006. 디지털도서관 기술 동향: Library 2.0과 이용자 생성 메타데이터. '대학도서관 실무자 세미나 2006', 39-61. 서울: 한국교육학술정보원
  2. Arko, R.A., Ginger, K.M., Kastens, K.A. and J. Weatherley. 2006. 'Using annotations to add value to a digital library for education.' D-Lib Magazine, 2(3).
  3. Casey, Michael. and Savastinuk, Laura. 2006. 'Library 2.0: Service for the next- generation library.' In Library Journal. 1 September 2006. [online]. [cited 2008. 2.16].
  4. Notess, R. Greg. 2006. 'The terrible twos: web 2.0, library 2.0, and more.' Online, 30(3): 40-42. [online]. [cited 2008.2.14].
  5. Streefkerk, Marco. 2006. 'Listen to the users: Use, user survey and usability testing with the digital library in Amsterdam.' [online]. [cited 2006.5.6]. . 재인용: 이성숙. 2006. 학술연구정보서시스(RISS)의 발전방안 연구. '한국도서관정보학회지', 37(3): 103-129
  6. Regazzi, J. John. 2004. 'The battle for mindshare: A battle beyond access and retrieval(miles conrad memorial lecture).' In 46th NFAIS Annual Conference. February 2004. [online]. [cited 2008. 2.15].
  7. Maness, M. Jack. 2006. 'Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for Libraries.' Webology, 3(2). [online]. [cited 2008.2.14].
  8. 김기영. 2007. Library 2.0: 개념과 논점. '정보관리강좌 2007', 47-59. 한국정보관리학회
  9. 이지연. 2006. '산, 학, 연 과학기술 정보자원 이용행태 및 니즈 연구'. 서울: 한국과학기술정보원
  10. Casey, Michael. 2005. 'Librarians Without Borders.' In Library Crunch. 26 September 2005. [online]. [cited 2008.2.15].
  11. Bookjetty 미국 의회도서관 플릭커 서비스
  12. Chabot, Steven. 2007. 'Empirical Research and Library 2.0.' In Subject/Object. 31 October 2007. [online]. [cited 2008. 2.14].
  13. Casey, Michael. and Savastinuk, Laura. 2007. 'We Know What Library 2.0 Is and Is Not.' In Library Crunch. 31 October 2007. [online]. [cited 2008.2.16].
  14. Crawford, Walt. 2006. 'Library 2.0 and Library 2.0'.' Cites & Insights, 6(2): 1-32. [online]. [cited 2008.2.15].

Cited by

  1. A Study on the State of the Service-based Library 2.0 Through Web Site Analysis of Korean University Libraries vol.42, pp.4, 2011,
  2. A Study on Social Media Marketing Strategies for Digital Libraries vol.42, pp.4, 2011,
  3. Global Dissemination of Domestic Scholarly Journals Using DOI and Open Access vol.42, pp.4, 2011,
  4. An Analysis of Mobile Web 2.0 as a Information Convergence Technology for Ubiquitous Library Application vol.39, pp.3, 2008,