DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Review of the Meta-Analysis in Library and Information Science

문헌정보학분야에서 메타분석 연구에 관한 고찰

  • 노정순 (한남대학교 문과대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Published : 2008.03.30

Abstract

Meta-analysis refers to the analysis of analysis. It is the statistical analysis of a large collection of analysis results from individual studies for the purpose of summarizing, integrating and interpreting the inconsistent findings. However, no meta-analysis study has been conducted in Library and Information Science in Korea. This Study introduced the characteristics, basic principles, analysis procesure, and major models of meta-analysis, reviewed meta-analysis studies in Library and Information Science, and discussed major problems in conducting meta-analysis in Library and Information Science especially in Korea.

Keywords

Meta-analysis;Library and Information Science;Quantitative Analysis

References

  1. 오성삼. 2002. '메타분석의 이론과 실제'. 서울: 건국대학교출판부
  2. Ankem, Kalyani. 2005. 'Approaches to meta- analysis: a guide for LIS researchers.' Libraryand Iinformation Science Research, 27(2): 164-176
  3. Ankem, Kalyani. 2006. 'Factors influencing information needs among cancer patients: a meta-analysis.' Libraryand Information Science Research, 28(1): 7-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2005.11.003
  4. Chau, Patrick. 1999. 'On the Use of construct reliability in MIS research: a meta- analysis.' Information and Management, 35(4): 217-227 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00089-5
  5. Chen, Chaomei and R. Rada, 1996. 'Interacting with hypertext: a meta-analysis of experimental studies.' Human-Computer Interaction, 11(2): 125-156 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1102_2
  6. Field, Andy P. 2005. 'Is the meta-analysis of correlation coefficients accurate when population correlations vary?' Psycho- logical Methods, 10(4): 444-467 https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.444
  7. Hedges, Larry V. 1981. 'Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators.' Journal of Educa- tional Statistics, 7: 119-137
  8. Hunter, John E. and Frank L. Schmidt. 2004. Methods of meta-analysis: collection error and bias in research findings. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications
  9. Hwang, Mark I. and Jerry W. Lin. 1999. 'Information dimension, information overload and decision quality.' Journal of Information Science, 25(3): 213-218
  10. King, William R. and Jun He. 2006. 'A meta- analysis of the technology acceptance model.' Information and Management, 43(6): 740-755 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
  11. Lipsey, Mark W. and David B. Wilson. 2001. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications
  12. Martin, Jose, Victor Perez, Montse Sacristan, and Enric Alvarez. 2005. 'Is grey literature essential for a better control of publication bias in psychiatry? An example form three meta-analyses of schizophrenia.' European Psychiatry, 20: 550-553 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2005.03.011
  13. Osburn, H. G. and John Callender. 1992. 'A Note on the sampling variance of the mean uncorrected correlation in meta- analysis and validity generalization.' Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(2): 115-122 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.2.115
  14. Saxton, Matthew L. 2006. 'Meta-analysis in Library and Information Science: me- thod, history, and recommendations for reporting research.' Library Trends, 55(1): 158-170 https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0052
  15. Winston, Mark D. 2007. 'Ethical leadership and ethical decision making: a meta- analysis of research related to ethics education.' Library and Information Science Research, 29(2): 230-251 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2007.04.002
  16. Wolf, Fredric M. 1986. Meta-analysis: quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hill, CA: SAGE Publications
  17. Rosenthal, Robert. 1991. Meta-analytic pro cedures for social research. 2nd ed. Newbery Park: SAGE Publications
  18. Hjorland, Birger. 2005. 'Why is meta analysis neglected by information scientists?' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(13): 1193-1194 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1179
  19. Mead, T. L. and D. T. Richards, 1995. 'Librarian participation in meta-analysis projects.' Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 83(4): 461-464
  20. Olson, Hope A. and Rose Schlegl. 2001. 'Stan- dardization, objectivity, and user focus: a meta-analysis of subject access critiques.' Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 32(2): 61-80 https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v32n02_06
  21. Trahan, Eric. 1990. Comparing computerized and paper based information retrieval systems in library public services: a meta-analysis. MLS thesis. State University of New York at Albany
  22. Hjorland, Birger. 2002. 'Meta-analysis should also be visible inside information science.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4): 324-324 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10070
  23. Lee, Gwanhoo and Weidong Xia. 2006. 'Orga- nizational size and IT innovation ado- ption: a meta-analysis.' Information and Management, 43(8): 975-985 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.09.003
  24. Spoerri, Anselm. 2007 'Using the structure of overlap between search results to rank retrieval systems without relevance judgments.' Information Processing and Management, 43(4): 1059-1070 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.09.009
  25. Haug, James D. 1997. 'Physicians' preference for information sources: a meta-analytic study.' Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 85(3): 223-232
  26. Hunter, John E., Frank L. Schmidt, and Gregg B. Jackson. 1982. Meta-analysis: cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publi- cations
  27. Chen, Chaomei and Yue Yu. 2000. 'Empirical studies of information visualization: a meta-analysis.' Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 53: 851-866 https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2000.0422
  28. Saxton, Matthew L. 1997. 'Reference service evaluation and meta-analysis: findings and methodological issues.' The Library Quarterly, 67(3): 267-289 https://doi.org/10.1086/629952
  29. Shelley, Mack C. II and John H. Schuh. 2001. 'Are the best higher education journals really the best? a meta-analysis of writing quality and readability.' Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 33(1): 11-23 https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.33.1.11
  30. 노정순. 2006. 국내외 문헌정보학분야 연구에서 추론통계 사용에 관한 연구. '한국문헌정보학회지', 40(1): 119-138
  31. Lemeshow, Adina R., R. E. Blum, J. A. Berlin, M. A. Stoto, and G. Colditz. 2005. 'Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of abservational studies.' Journal of Cli- nical Epidemiology, 58: 867-873 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.03.004
  32. Li, Elden Y. 1997. 'Perceived importance of information system success factors: a meta analysis of group differences.' Information and Management, 32(1): 15-28 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(97)00005-0
  33. Zhang, Li, Erin M. Watson, and Laura Banfield. 2007. 'The Efficacy of computer-assisted instruction versus face- to-face instruction in academic libraries: a systematic review.' Journal of Aca- demic Librarianship, 33(4): 478-484 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.03.006
  34. Lai, Vincent S. and Radha K. Mahapatra. 1997. 'Exploring the research in infor- mation technology implementation.' Information and Management, 32(4): 187-201 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(97)00022-0
  35. Cohen, Jacob. 1977. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press
  36. Silver, N. Clayton and William P. Dunlap. 1987. 'Averaging correlation coefficients: should Fisher's Z trasformation be used?' Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(1): 146-148 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.1.146
  37. Field, Andy P. 2001. 'Meta-analysis of corre- lation coefficients: a Monte Carlo com- parision of fixed and random effects methods.' Psychological Methods, 6(2): 161-180 https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.6.2.161
  38. Hunter, John E. and Frank L. Schmidt. 1990. Methods of meta-analysis: collection error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications
  39. Canepi, Kitti. 2007. 'Fund allocation formula analysis: determining elements for best practices in libraries.' Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 31: 12-24
  40. Koufogiannakis, Denise and Natasha Wiebe. 2006. 'Effective methods for teaching information literacy skills to undergra- duate students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.' Evidence based library and information practice, 1(3): 3-43.
  41. Rosenthal, Robert. 1984. Meta-analytic pro- cedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications
  42. Glass, Gene. 1976. 'Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research.' Educational Research, 5: 351-379
  43. Mahmood, Mo A., Laura Hall, and Daniel L. Swanberg. 2001. 'Factors affecting information technology usage: a meta- analysis of the empirical literature.' Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 11(2): 107- 130 https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327744JOCE1102_02
  44. White, Howard D. 2002. 'Library and information science(LIS) in aid of meta- analysis.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4): 323-323 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10069
  45. Schepers, Jeroen and Martin Wetzels. 2007. 'A Maeta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: investigating subjec- tive norm and moderation effects.' Information and Management, 44: 90-103 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007
  46. Wantland, D. J., C. J. Portilla, W. L. Holzemer, R. Slaughter, and E. M. McGhee. 2004. 'The Effectiveness of web-based VS. non-web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes.' Journal of Internet Medical Research. 6(4). [cited 2008.1.7]

Cited by

  1. Bayesian Analysis of Dose-Effect Relationship of Cadmium for Benchmark Dose Evaluation vol.26, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2013.26.3.453