Effect of Storage Times on the Kinematics and Capacitation Status in Liquid Boar Semen

보존 기간이 돼지 액상정액의 운동역학 및 수정능 획득에 미치는 영향

  • Park, Yoo-Jin (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Song, Won-Hee (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kim, Yeon-Hee (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Mohamed, E.A. (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Oh, Shin-Ae (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Pang, Myung-Geol (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University)
  • 박유진 (중앙대학교 산업과학대학 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 송원희 (중앙대학교 산업과학대학 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 김연희 (중앙대학교 산업과학대학 동물자원과학과) ;
  • ;
  • 오신애 (중앙대학교 산업과학대학 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 방명걸 (중앙대학교 산업과학대학 동물자원과학과)
  • Published : 2008.03.31

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate modification of semen quality during storage. Liquid boar semen samples extended in Beltsville Thawing Solution were stored at $17^{\circ}C$ up to 5 days. While % motility and linearity significantly decreased eon day 3 in extender, the qualitative motility patterns were maintained satisfactorily. Also the storage of boar semen up to 5 days before insemination did not significantly changed the acrosome intactness. However, acrosome changed sperm significantly increased and capacitated sperm significantly decreased from day 4. No significant modifications in acrosome integrity were showed during sperm storage; these results suggest that liquid boar semen may keep the quality in extender for 3 days.

References

  1. Estienne MJ, Harper AF, Day JL (2007): Characteristics of sperm motility in boar semen diluted in different extenders and stored for seven days at 18$^{\circ}C$. Reprod Biol 7:221-231
  2. Johnson LA, Weitze KF, Fiser P, Maxwell WM (2000): Storage of boar semen. Anim Reprod Sci 62:143-172 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00157-3
  3. Lee SH, Cheong HT, Yang BK, Park CK (2005): Development of semen extenders by assessment of sperm viability in miniature pig semen. Reprod Dev Biol 29:247-252
  4. Sutkeviciene N, Andersson M (2005): Assessment of boar semen quality in relation to fertility with special reference to methanol stress. Theriogenology 63:739-747 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.04.006
  5. Vishwanath R, Shannon P (1997): Do sperm cells age? A review of the physiological changes in sperm during storage at ambient temperature. Reprod Fertil Dev 9:321-331 https://doi.org/10.1071/R96088
  6. Watson P (1990): Artificial insemination and the preservation of semen. In: Lamming G (ed). Marshall's Physiology of Reproduction. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, UK, pp 747-869
  7. Adeoya-Osiguwa SA, Fraser LR (2005): Cathine and norephedrine, both phenylpropanolamines, accelerate capacitation and then inhibit spontaneous acrosome loss. Hum Reprod 20:198-207 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh566
  8. Fraser LR, Abeydeera LR, Niwa K (1995): $Ca^2+$-regulating mechanisms that modulate bull sperm capacitation and acrosomal exocytosis as determined by chlortetracycline analysis. Mol Reprod Dev 40:233-241 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080400213
  9. Aitken RJ, Best FS, Richardson DW, Djahanbakhch O, Mortimer D, Templeton AA, Lees MM (1982c): An analysis of sperm function in cases of unexplained infertility: Conventional criteria, movement characteristics and fertilizing capacity. Fertil Steril 38:212-221 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)46462-9
  10. Dube C, Beaulieu M, Reyes-Moreno C, Guillemette C, Bailey JL (2004): Boar sperm storage capacity of BTS and androhep plus: viability, motility, capacitation, and tyrosine phosphorylation. Theriogenology 62:874-886 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.12.006
  11. Holt WV, O'Brien J, Abaigar T (2007): Applications and interpretation of computer-assisted sperm analyses and sperm sorting methods in assisted breeding and comparative research. Reprod Fertil Dev 19(6):709-718 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD07037
  12. Waberski D, Magnus F, Mendonca Ferreira F, Petrunkina AM, Weitze KF, Topfer-Petersen E (2005): Importance of sperm-binding assays for fertility prognosis of porcine spermatozoa. Theriogenology 63:470-484 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.025
  13. Clarke RN, Johnson LA (1987): Effect of liquid storage and cryopreservation of boar spermatozoa on acrosomal integrity and the penetration of zonafree hamster ova in vitro. Gamete Res 16:193- 204 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1120160302
  14. Gadea J, Matas C, Lucas X (1998): Prediction of porcine semen fertility by homologous in vitro penetration (hIVP) assay. Anim Reprod Sci 54:95-108 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(98)00144-4
  15. Evenson DP, Thompson L, Jost L (1994): Flow cytometric evaluation of boar semen by the sperm chromatin structure assay as related to cryopreservation and fertility. Theriogenology 41:637-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(94)90174-H
  16. Kommisrud E, Paulenz H, Sehested E, Greule IS (2002): Influence of boar and semen parameters on motility and acrosome integrity in liquid boar semen stored for 5 days. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 43:49-55 https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-43-49
  17. Thomas CA, Garner DL, DeJarnette JM, Marshall CE (1997): Fluorometric assessments of acrosomal integrity and viability in cryopreserved bovine spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 56(4):991-998 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod56.4.991
  18. Yanagimachi R (1994): Mammalian fertilization. In Knobil E and Neill JD (eds). The Physiology of Reproduction 2nd ed. Raven Press. New York, USA, pp 189-317
  19. Suzuki K, Geshi M, Yamauchi N, Nagai T (2003): Functional changes and motility characteristics of Japanese Black bull spermatozoa separated by Percoll. Anim Reprod Sci 77:157-172 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00035-6
  20. Hirai M, Boersma A, Hoeflich A, Wolf E, Foll J, Aumuller TR, Braun J (2001): Objectively measured sperm motility and sperm head morphometry in boars: relation to fertility and seminal plasma growth factors. J Androl 22(1):104-10
  21. Huo LJ, Ma XH, Yang ZM (2002): Assessment of sperm viability, mitochondrial activity, capacitation and acrosome intactness in extended boar semen during long-term storage. Theriogenology 58:1349-1360 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)00953-6