Priority Re-setting for Future Core & Strategic Technologies in Agricultural and Environmental Science

농업환경 분야의 미래유망기술 및 전략기술에 관한 우선순위 재설정

  • Cho, Keun-Tae (Department of Systems Management Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Joo, Jin-Ho (Department of Biological Environment, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Ok, Yong-Sik (Department of Biological Environment, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Shin, Bong-Chul (Agricultural R&D Promotion Center) ;
  • Kim, Jee-Yong (Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-In (Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, Kangwon National University)
  • 조근태 (성균관대학교 시스템경영공학과) ;
  • 주진호 (강원대학교 자원생물환경학과) ;
  • 옥용식 (강원대학교 자원생물환경학과) ;
  • 신봉철 (농림기술관리센터) ;
  • 김지용 (강원대학교 농업자원경제학과) ;
  • 이종인 (강원대학교 농업자원경제학과)
  • Published : 2008.12.31


The objective of this study was to set priority for future core technologies in agricultural and environmental science using analytic hierarchy process(AHP). Forty-six technologies were derived by specialist meetings. Evaluation criteria, for setting the priority were decided as 'technology', 'marketability', and 'public'. Eighteen specialists in agricultural and environmental science answered to the questionnaire for AHP. As the results, 'technology' was decided as the most important evaluation criterion. The 'Feasibility' in 'technology' criterion, 'Market Growth' in 'marketability' criterion, and 'Impact to other industry' in 'public' criterion were decided as sub-criteria in each criterion. The most important technology was 'Risk assessment of toxic heavy metals and establishment of accreditation criteria for environmentally friendly agricultural products.


  1. Korean rural economic institute. (2007) Innovation for agricultural rechnology in Korea : success and strategies
  2. Hwang, J-K., Lee, J-I., Lee, J-M., Cho, K-T. and Cho, Y-G. (2004) Survey for technology forecasting using delphi in horticultural science. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol 82, 242-250
  3. Saaty, T. (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
  4. Saaty, T. (1983) Priority setting in complex problem. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 30, p.140-155
  5. Zahedi, F. (1986) The analytic hierarchy process-a survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces 16, 161-167
  6. Cho, K-T., Cho, Y-G. and Kang, H-S. (2003) Decision making by AHP. Dong Hyun Publishing Company, p.33-39
  7. Lee, K-C. et al. (2004) Forecasting future technology. Drawing Road Maps, and Developing Effective Investment Techniques in the Agricultural Sector, Ministry of Agriculture & Forest
  8. Lee, J-I., Cho, K-T. and Chae, J-C. (2004) Priority setting for future core technologies in crops using the AHP. Korean J. Crop Sci. 49, 546-551
  9. Ministruy of agriculture and forestry. (1998) Extended plans on agricultural technology development
  10. Special commission on agriculture, fisheries and rural policies of Korea. (1994) Development plans on rural and fishing communities and promotion plans on agricultural policies reform
  11. OECD. (2004) The economic impacts of biotechnology. DSTI/STP/NESTI 6, Paris
  12. Kwon, C-S. and Cho, K-T. (2001) An applied study of the AHP on the selection of nonmemory semiconductor chip. KORMS 18, 5-9
  13. Cho, K-T., Ha, S-D., Kim, S-M., and Yeom, Y-K. (2000) Selection of medical appliance development program for small and medium enterprise using AHP. Study of Technology Innovation, 8, p.12
  14. Lee, J-I., Cho, K-T., Chang, S-D., Shin, B-C. (2006) Priority setting for future core technologies in agricultural environmental science using the AHP. Management science study 32, 101-112