DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Safety Evaluation Method for a Product Design Planning Stage: Application of AHP and Fuzzy

AHP 및 Fuzzy를 이용한 제품기획단계에서의 안전성 평가

  • Park, Ji-Young (Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Dongguk University) ;
  • Cho, Am (Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Dongguk University)
  • 박지영 (동국대학교 산업시스템공학과) ;
  • 조암 (동국대학교 산업시스템공학과)
  • Published : 2008.06.01

Abstract

As users increasingly recognize the importance of safety and the Product Liability comes into effect, a company should take responsibility of protecting the users who use its product. In order to produce a safe product and satisfy the needs of users, it is critical for develope opriately and understand the characteristics of the product accurately. Furthermore, a safe product can be realized by considering a safety level of the product in a whole product development process. However, in general, product development projects hardly evaluate the safety of a product in the product planning step. In addition, most of safety evaluation methods which are applied in the product planning step have a tendency to be qualitative because a detailed product design step. Therefore, this research aims at enhancing the performance of the safety evaluation process by applying quantitative methods such as 'AHP' and 'Fuzzy'. AHP can help analysts derive the weight of safety factors. Fuzzy is applied to evaluate the degree of safety of product elements in this paper. The proposed method will be able to improve the safety level of a product by using the quantitative methods in the product planning step.

References

  1. 곽효연, 이상도, 디자인 프로세스에서 평가방법의 문제점과 퍼지 이론의 적용, 공업경영학회지, Vol.20, No.42, pp.59-66, 1997
  2. 김경훈, 조재립, 고객지향적 품질향상을 위한 신제품개발에 관한 연구, 대한산업공학회 추계학술대회 논문집, 2002
  3. 김재정 외 공역, 재품개발론, 한올출판사, 2004
  4. 박경찬, DFSS(Design For Six sigma)를 적용한 기능성 유형의 디자 인 프로세스 연구, 중앙대학교 석사학위논문, 2005
  5. 오상준, 원가 절감, 제품개발 단계에 집중하라, LG주간경제, 2006
  6. 윤원영, 김현식, 신뢰성 설계 프로세스에 관한 사례분석, 대한산 업공학회 추계학술대회 논문집, 2004
  7. 이용표, 신제품개발프로세스, 오토저널, vol.27, No.1, 2005
  8. 이종석, 중소기업 제품의 품질확보를 위한 디자인 프로세스 개선 에 관한 연구, 세종대학교 대학원, 박사학위 논문, 2004
  9. 정원, 김준홍, 제품개발 과정에서 AMSAA 모델의 실용적 활용방 법, IE Interfaces, Vol.19, No.1, 19-25, 2006
  10. 정원, 이익성, 제조물 안전 설계를 위한 QDRD의 적용, 경영과학연구, Vol.10, 57-65, 2001
  11. Basnyat, S., Navarre, D. and Palanque, P., Complexity of Design in Safety Critical Interactive Systems, 2nd Workshop on Complexity in Design and Engineering. Glasgow, Scotland. UK 10th-12th, 45-58, 2005
  12. Carbonara, N. and Scozzi, B., Cognitive maps to analyze new product development processes, Technovation, Volume 26, Issue 11, November, 1233-1243, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.09.007
  13. Dowlatshahi, S., The role of product safety and liability in concurrent engineering, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol.41, 187-209, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(01)00054-7
  14. Hasan, R., Bernard, A., Ciccotelli, J. and Martin, P., Integrating safety into the design process: elements and concepts relative to the working situation, Safety Science, Volume41, Issues2-3, 155-179, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00002-4
  15. Herder, P. M. and Weijnen, P. Quality criteria for process design in the design process - industrial case studies and an expert panel Computers & Chemical Engineering, Volume 22, Supplement 1, 15 March, S513-S520, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(98)00095-7
  16. Hsiao, S. W., Concurrent design method for developing a new product, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol.29, Issue.1, 42-55, 2002
  17. Hsiao, S. W. and Chou, J. R., A creativity-based design process for innovative product design, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Volume 34, Issue 5, 421-443, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2004.05.005
  18. Kir, G. J. and Folger, T. A., Fuzzy sets, Uncertainty, and Information, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jerssey, 1988
  19. Park, K. S. and Kim, J. S., Fuzzy Weighted-Checklist with Linguistic Variables, IEEE TRANSACTION ON RELIABILITY, Vol.39, No.3, 1990
  20. Saaty, T., The Analytic Hierachy Process, McGraw Hill, 1980
  21. Saaty, T., A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, J. Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, 234-281, 1997
  22. Shahrokhi, M. A. and Bernard, A. C., Risk assessment/prevention in industrial design process, IEEE International Conference on System, Manand Cybernetics, 2592-2598, 2004
  23. Ulrich, K. T. and Eppinger, S. D., Product Design and Development(3rd Ed.), McGraw-Hill, 2004
  24. Vollmer, T., Borcherding, K., Hellriegel, G. and Penzhorn, R.-D., Process control under safety aspects, Fusion Engineering and Design, Vol. 48, No. 1, 57-61, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-3796(00)00130-7
  25. Zadeh, L. A., A fuzzy algorithmic approach to definition of complex and imprecise concept, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol.8, 249-291, 1976 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(76)80001-6