• Published : 2008.12.31


In this study, a conceptual pyroprocess flowsheet has been devised by combining several dry-type unit processes; its applicability as an alternative fuel cycle technology was analyzed. A key point in the evaluation of its applicability to the fuel cycle was the recovery yield of fissile materials from spent fuels as well as the proliferation resistance of the process. The recovery yields of uranium and transuranic elements (TRU) were obtained from a material balance for every unit process composing the whole pyroprocess. The material balances for several elemental groups of interest such as uranium, TRU, rare earth, gaseous fission products, and heat generating elements were calculated on the basis of the knowledge base that is available from domestic and foreign experimental results or technical information presented in open literature. The calculated result of the material balance revealed that uranium and TRU could be recovered at 98.0% and 97.0%, respectively, from a typical PWR spent fuel. Furthermore, the anticipated TRU product was found to emit a non-negligible level of $\gamma$-ray and a significantly higher level of neutrons compared to that of a typical plutonium product obtained from the PUREX process. The results indicate that the product from this conceptual pyroprocessing should be handled in a shielded cell and that this will contribute favorably to retaining proliferation resistance.


  1. W.H.Hannum, D.Wade and G. Stanford, 'Self-Protection in Dry Recycle Technologies', Argonne National Laboratory, Proc. Global ''95, p.83 (1995)
  2. K.Kinoshita et al, 'Separation of Uranium and Transuranic Elements from rare earth Elements by Means of Multistage Extraction in LiCl-KCl/Bi System', J. Nucl. Sci. and Tech. 36, 2 p.189-197 (1999)
  3. Hee-Seong Shin, Nuclear data obtained from the ORIGEN2, v2.1, 'Spontaneous fission neutron source from irradiation of PWR fuel', Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2007
  4. G.R.Choppin et al, committee on electrometallurgical techniques for DOE spent fuel treatment, USA, 'Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment', National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. (2000)
  5. Jae-Hyung Yoo, Han-Soo Lee and Eung-Ho Kim, 'Prediction of a mutual separation of actinide and rare earth groups in a multistage reductive extraction system', Nucl. Eng. & Tech. 39, 5 (2007)
  6. J.A.Stone, D.R.Johnson, 'Measurement of Radioactive Gaseous Effluents from Voloxidation and Dissolution of Spent Nuclear Fuel', DP-MS-78-7, Savannah River Lab. (1978)
  7. Laurie M. Unger, D.K.Trubey, 'Specific Gamma-ray Dose Constants for Nuclides Important to Dosimetry and Radiological Assessment', ORNL/RSIC-45/RI, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1982)
  8. S.Herrmann, S.Li and M. Simpson, 'Electrolytic Reduction of Spent Light Water Reactor Fuel', J. Nucl. Sci. and Tech. 44, 3 p.361-367 (2007)
  9. Sang-Mun Jeong et al, 'Inactive test of the electrolytic reduction system in the ACP hot cell', KAERI/TR-3170 (2006)
  10. Jae-Hyung Yoo et al, 'Design study of advanced nuclear fuel cycle system(II)-Establishment of the concept of the recycle system using molten salt', KAERI/TS-196, 2004 (Translation report of JNC TN 9400 98-003)
  11. Jang-Jin Park et al, 'Trapping Technology for Gaseous Fission Products from Voloxidation Process', KAERI/TR-3047 (2005)
  12. Jae-Hyung Yoo et al, 'Pyrometallurgical Process of Actinide Metals', KAERI/AR-540 (1999)
  13. Jae-Hyung Yoo et al, 'Development of transmutation technology for long-lived radionuclides', KAERI/RR-2810 (2006)
  14. L.Koch, T.Inoue, T.Yokoo, 'A Safer Nuclear Fuel Management Strategy without Sensitive Technology and Weapon Useable Material', Proc. Global 2005, Tsukuba, Japan, Oct 9-13, 2005
  15. Jang-Jin Park et al, 'Development of voloxidation technology for PWR spent fuels', KAERI/RR-2840 (2006)
  16. G.S.You et al, 'Conceptual Design Report of Hot Cell Facilities for demonstration of Advanced Spent Fuel Management Process', p.7, KAERI/TR-2092 (2002)
  17. M.Salvatores et al, 'Assessment of pyrochemical processes for separation/transmutation strategies', PG-DRRV/Dir/00-92, CEA, France (2000)
  18. Keun-Il Park et al, 'Hot Experiment on Fission Gas Release Behavior from Voloxidation Process using Spent fuel', KAERI/TR-3448 (2007)

Cited by

  1. Oxidation State Shift of Uranium during U(III) Synthesis with Cd(II) and Bi(III) in LiCl–KCl Melt vol.13, pp.10, 2010,
  2. In Situ Electrochemical Measurement of O2− Concentration in Molten Li2O∕LiCl during Uranium Oxide Reduction Process vol.15, pp.3, 2012,
  3. O Molten Salt vol.16, pp.3, 2013,
  4. Electrochemical Reduction Process for Pyroprocessing vol.52, pp.3, 2014,
  5. O-LiCl Molten Salt using Porous Anode Shroud vol.18, pp.3, 2015,
  6. Production of uranium metal via electrolytic reduction of uranium oxide in molten LiCl and salt distillation vol.304, pp.2, 2015,
  7. Thermodynamic properties of actinides and rare earth fission products in liquid cadmium pp.1588-2780, 2015,
  8. Electrochemical preparation and spectroelectrochemical study of neptunium chloride complexes in LiCl–KCl eutectic melts vol.308, pp.1, 2016,
  9. Distillation characteristics of LiCl–Li2O electrolyte for UO2 electrolytic reduction process vol.310, pp.3, 2016,
  10. Engineering Design of a Voloxidizer with a Double Reactor for the Hull Separation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Rods vol.2017, pp.1687-6083, 2017,
  11. Injection casting of U–Zr and U–Zr–RE fuel slugs and their characterization vol.54, pp.6, 2017,
  12. Scaling Up Fabrication of UO2 Porous Pellet With a Simulated Spent Fuel Composition vol.15, pp.4, 2017,
  13. Application of Phase-Field Theory to Model Uranium Oxide Reduction Behavior in Electrolytic Reduction Process vol.16, pp.3, 2018,
  14. Investigations on Detecting Potential Nuclear Material Diversion from a Pyroprocessing Facility pp.1943-7471, 2018,