A Study on the Application of Two-dosimeter Algorithm to Estimate the Effective Dose in an Inhomogeneous Radiation Field at Korean Nuclear Power Plants

원전 불균일 방사선장하에서 유효선량 평가를 위한 복수선량계 알고리즘 적용방안 연구

  • Published : 2008.12.30


In Korean nuclear power plants (NPPs), two thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) were provided to workers who work in an inhomogeneous radiation field; one on the chest and the other on the head. In this way, the effective dose for radiation workers at NPPs was determined by the high deep dose between two radiation dose from these TLDs. This represented a conservative method of evaluating the degree of exposure to radiation. In this study, to prevent the overestimation of the effective dose, field application experiments were implemented using two-dosimeter algorithms developed by several international institutes for the selection of an optimal algorithm. The algorithms used by the Canadian Ontario Power Generation (OPG) and American ANSI HPS N13.41, NCRP (55/50), NCRP (70/30), EPRI (NRC), Lakslumanan, and Kim (Texas A&M University) were extensively analyzed as two-dosimeter algorithms. In particular, three additional TLDs were provided to radiation workers who wore them on the head, chest, and back during maintenance periods, and the measured value were analyzed. The results found no significant differences among the calculated effective doses, apart from Lakshmanan's algorithm. Thus, this paper recommends the NCRP(55/50) algorithm as an optimal two-dosimeter algorithm in consideration of the solid technical background of NCRP and the convenience of radiation works. In addition, it was determined that a two-dosimeter is provided to a single task which is expected to produce a dose rate of more than 1 mSv/hr, a difference of dose rates depending on specific parts of the body of more than 30%, and an exposure dose of more than 2 mSv.


  1. International Atomic Energy Agency. International Basic Safety Standards for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources. IAEA Safety Series No. 115, Vienna, 1996
  2. 한국수력원자력(주). 고리 제1발전소 절차서: 방사선작업자 선량관리절차서. 방사 0-5-003, 2004
  3. 한국수력원자력(주). 월성 제2발전소 절차서: 피폭 방사선량 관리절차서. 방사-004, 2004
  4. 한국수력원자력(주). 영광 제2발전소 절차서: 피폭 방사선량 평가 및 관리절차서. 방사-201, 2004
  5. 한국수력원자력(주). 울진 제1발전소 절차서: 피폭 방사선량 평가 및 관리절차서. 방사선-1-5, 2004
  6. 한국수력원자력(주). 울진 제2발전소 절차서: 방사선량 평가 및 관리절차서. 방사-18, 2004
  7. 한국수력원자력(주). 울진 제3발전소 절차서: 피폭 방사선량 평가 및 관리절차서. 방사-15, 2004
  8. Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Plants. Radiation Protection Implementing Procedure (Dosimetry Use, Placement and Dose Tracking), S-RPIP-5.1 (Rev. 5), 2004
  9. Advisory Committee on Radiological Protection of Canada. Report on External Occupational Dosimetry in Canada. 1995
  10. American National Standards Institute (ANSI). An American National Standard Criteria for Performing Multiple Dosimetry. Report No. HPS N13.41, 1997
  11. Lakshmanan AR, Kher RK, Supe SJ. Estimation of Effective Dose Equivalent Using Individual Dosemeters, Radat. Prot. Dosim. 1991;35(4):247-252
  12. 이계석. 광자 방사선장에서 TL 개인선량계의 감응과 유효선량과의 편차. 한양대학교 대학원 석사학위논문, 2000
  13. International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Pergamon Press, 2007
  14. 교육과학기술부 원자력연구기술개발사업, 방사선 리스크 저감 선진기술개발(대과제)/방사선방호 최적화 연구(세부과제), 한국원자력안전기술원, 2007
  15. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2004-01: Method for Estimating Effective Dose Equivalent from External Radiation Sources Using Two Dosimeters. Report No. RIS 2004-01, 2004
  16. International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 Recommendation of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Pergamon Press, 1991
  17. 김희근, 공태영, 박규준. 원전 불균일 방사선장하에서 유효선량평가를 위한 복수선량계 알고리즘 적용방안(Rev.4), 한전전력연구원, 2006
  18. 한국수력원자력(주). 영광 제3발전소 절차서: 피폭 방사선량 평가 및 관리절차서. 방사-16, 2004
  19. 吉澤 道夫, 水下 誠一. 外部被ばく及び內部被ばくの評價法に係る技術的指針 について. 保健物理 34(3). 1999:319-322
  20. 교육과학기술부. 고시 2008-48호: 판독업무 등록기준 및 검사에 관한 규정, 2008
  21. Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plants. Special Dosimeters of Radiation Protection Procedures (6.2-007), 2004
  22. Kim CH, Reece WD, Poston JW. Development of a Two-dosimeter Algorithm for Better Estimation of Effective Dose Equivalent and Effective Dose. Radat. Prot. Dosim. 1999;81(2):101-112 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032573
  23. San Onofre Nuclear Power Plants. Health Physics Procedure, SO-123-VII-20.10, 2004
  24. Institute of Nuclear Power Operations. Guidelines for Radiological Protection at Nuclear Power Stations. INPO 91-014 (Rev. 1), 1995
  25. 한국원자력안전기술원. 2004 원자력안전기술정보회의, 방사선분과, 2004
  26. Kim CH. Use of Two Dosimeters for Better Estimation of Effective Dose. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University, 1998
  27. Ontario Power Generation. Summary of Changes to the Method of Assigning Dose from Multiple TLD Badges, 2002
  28. 한국수력원자력(주). 월성 제1발전소 절차서: 종사자 피폭 방사선량 관리절차서. 방 0-6-105, 2004
  29. Xu XG, Reece WD, Poston JW. A Study of the Angular Dependence Problem in Effective Dose Equivalent Assessment. Health Physics, 1995;68(2):214-224 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199502000-00007
  30. 한국수력원자력(주). 영광 제1발전소 절차서: 방사선 피폭 관리절차서. 방사-114, 2004
  31. Ontario Power Generation. Ontario Hydro Radiation Protection Dosimetry Programme. IR-11 (Revision 2), 1992
  32. 한국수력원자력(주). 고리 제2발전소 절차서: 개인 방사선량 관리 및 기록절차서. 방사선 01-04, 2004
  33. PSEG Nuclear Organization Units 1, 2 and 3. Special Dosimetry Issue and Monitoring, NC.RP-TI.ZZ-0302(Q)-Rev.2, 2005
  34. Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plants. External Dosimetry Procedure(Non uniform dose field dosimetry requirements), 2004
  35. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). Use of Personal Monitors to Estimate Effective Dose Equivalent and Dose to Workers for External Exposure to Low-LET Radiation. NCRP Report No.122, Bethesda, 1995