Exploring Factors Influencing Users' Continuance Intention in Social Networking Sites

사회네트워킹 사이트 이용자 지속의도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 탐구

  • 박지홍 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Published : 2008.12.31


The success of social networking sites (SNSs) may depend on many factors. Continuance use of SNSs is one of these. Especially, in the Web environment where users can leave one service with a single mouse click, maintaining existing members cost much time and efforts. Without continuance use of SNSs, SNS-based service would not create any value. This study focused on identifying factors influencing users' continuance intention in SNSs. Based on relevant literature review, six influencing factors were initially identified. They were reputation, relational capital, knowledge quality, compatibility, personalization, and satisfaction. Web-based questionnaire survey was conducted and a total of 325 usable responses were collected. Reliability test and two rounds of exploratory factor analyses resulted in identifying five factors. The relationship between the factors and the continuance intention was tested by using multiple regression analyses. The analyses revealed that satisfaction was the most significant factor. Knowledge quality and relational capital also had significant effects while reputation and personalization did not have significant effect on continuance intention. Instead, reputation and personalization showed significance in influencing satisfaction.


  1. Altman, E., & P. Hernon. 1998. “Service quality and customer satisfaction do matter.” American Libraries, 29(7), 53-54
  2. Bhattacherjee, A. 2001a. “Understanding information systems continuance: An expectationconfirmation model.” MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370
  3. Bhattacherjee, A. 2001b. “An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance.” Decision Support Systems, 32, 201-214
  4. boyd, D. M., & N. B. Ellison. 2007. “Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11. Retrieved from.
  5. Brazelton, J., & G. Gorry. 2003. “Creating a knowledge-sharing community: If you build it, will they come?” Communications of the ACM, 46(2), 23-25
  6. Buskens, V. 2002. Social networks and trust. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers
  7. Castaneda, J. A., F. Munoz-Leiva, & T. Luque. 2007. “Web Acceptance Model (WAM): Moderating effects of user experience.” Information & Management, 44(4), 384-396
  8. Chen, I.Y.L. 2007. “The factors influencing members' continuance intentions in professional virtual communities-A longitudinal study.” Journal of Information Science, 33(4), 451-467
  9. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
  10. Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of infor mation technology.” MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340
  11. DeLone, W. H., & E. R. McLean. 2003. “The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update.” Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30
  12. Erdfelder, E., F. Faul, & A. Buchner. 1996. “GPOWER: A general power analysis program.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 1-11
  13. Facebook App (Facebook) Librarian: Books, Scholarly Resources, Facts+Stuff, Ask A Librarian. 2007, July 3. Retrieved from.
  14. Frias-Martinez, E., S. Y. Chen, & X. Liu. 2007. “Automatic cognitive style identification of digital library users for personalization.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2),237-251
  15. Friends: Social Networking Sites for Engaged Library Services. Retrieved from
  16. Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, & W. C. Black. 1992. Multivariate data analysis with readings. New York: Macmillan
  17. Kim, K.-H., & H. Yun. 2007. “Cying for me, Cying for us: Relational dialectics in a Korean social network site.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 15. Retrieved from
  18. Li, C., & J. Bernoff. 2008. Groundswell: winning in a world transformed by social technologies. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press
  19. Lin, N. 2001. Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
  20. Lippert S. K., & H. Forman. 2005. “Utilization of information technology: Examining cognitive and experiential factors of post-adoption behavior.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(3), 363-381
  21. Lin, H.-F. 2007. “The role of online and offline features in sustaining virtual communities: An empirical study.” Internet Research, 17(2), 119-138
  22. Marchionini, G., C. Plaisant, & A. Komlodi. 1998. “Interfaces and tools for the library of congress national digital library program.” Information Processing & Management, 34(5), 535-555
  23. Moon, Y. J., & J. H. Lee. 2006. “A study on the effect of trust of online community on community loyalty.” Journal of the Korea E-Commerce Research Academy, 7(1), 3-22
  24. Nunnally, J. C. 1967. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill
  25. Oh, D.-G. 2005. “Influences of public library service quality on user satisfaction and loyalty.” Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(4), 61-78
  26. Oleck, J. 2007. “Libraries use MySpace to attract teens: More and more libraries are taking advantage of the popular social networking site.” School Library Journal, July, 16
  27. Parthasarathy, M., & A. Bhattacherjee. 1998. “Understanding post-adoption behavior in the context of online services.” Information Systems Research, 9(4), 362-379
  28. Piccoli, G., & G. Ives. 2003. “Trust and the unintended effects of behavior control in virtual teams.” MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 365-295
  29. Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, & N. P. Podsakoff. 2003. “Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903
  30. Ridings, C. M., & D. Gefen. 2004. “Virtual community attraction: Why people hang out online.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1), article 4. Retrieved from.
  31. Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press
  32. Spiller, J., A. Vlasic, & P. Yetton. 2007. “Postadoption behavior of users of Internet service providers.” Information & Management, 44(6), 513-523
  33. Tiwana, A., & A. A. Bush. 2005. “Continuance in expertise-sharing networks: A social perspective.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(1), 85-101
  34. Thong, J.Y.L., S.-J. Hong, & K. Y. Tam. 2006. “The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(9), 799-810
  35. University of Minnesota. 2008, June 21. Educational benefits of social networking sites uncovered. ScienceDaily. Retrieved July 16, 2008, from.
  36. van Deventer M. J., & R.M.M.M. Snyman. 2004. “Measuring for sustainability: A multidimensional measurement framework for library and information services.” LIBRI, 54(1), 1-8
  37. Venkatesh, V., & F. D. Davis. 2000. “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies.” Management Science, 46(2), 186-204
  38. Wenger, E., R. McDermott, & W. M. Snyder. 2002. Cultivating communities of practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press
  39. Zeithaml, V. A., L. L. Berry, & A. Parasuraman. 1996. “The behavioural consequences of service quality.” Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31-46

Cited by

  1. Strategic Use of SNS in PR for Improving Trust in Government Policy vol.13, pp.5, 2013,
  2. Differences among university students and faculties in social networking site perception and use vol.28, pp.3, 2010,
  3. Structure Modeling on Factors Influencing the User Satisfaction of Social Network Services by Mediating the Moderator of the Service Types in SNS vol.21, pp.3, 2012,
  4. The effects of personalization on user continuance in social networking sites vol.50, pp.3, 2014,