DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improvement of the EIA for Land Reclamation Projects in the Coastal Areas of Korea

해양매립사업 환경영향평가의 개선방안

  • 장주형 (국립수산과학원 해양환경영향평가센터) ;
  • 엄기혁 (국립수산과학원 해양환경영향평가센터) ;
  • 권기영 (국립수산과학원 해양환경영향평가센터) ;
  • 홍석진 (국립수산과학원 환경연구팀) ;
  • 박재현 (국립수산과학원 해양환경영향평가센터) ;
  • 김귀영 (국립수산과학원 해양환경영향평가센터)
  • Published : 2007.07.30

Abstract

In Korean coastal areas, land reclamations are main development projects that should be based on environmental impact assessment(EIA), because those human interventions can change coastlines, damage tidal flats, and pollute adjacent areas to threat seafood safety and devaluate overall ecosystem service value. Existing procedures of the EIA for land reclamation projects were diagnosed and evaluated to enhance them. Problems were identified in the designation of survey areas, the consistency in survey sites and periods, the standardization of survey methods and reports, the confidence of survey results and the verification of predictions. Lack of integration was noticeable and could be improved by synthesizing different assessments from topography geography, marine physics, marine chemistry and marine biology. We suggest that successful precautionary marine environment management requires readjusting the cost of EIA, recruiting experts in marine environment, constructing database and establishing specialized assessment system.

References

  1. 해양수산부, 2006, 해양부문 환경영향평가 활성화를 위한 워크삽, 59pp
  2. 맹준호, 조광우, 주용준, 이지현, 홍재상, 강윤구, 김규한, 2005, 해양매립사업으로 인한 환경영향의 효율적인 저감방안에 관한 연구, 한국환경정책.평가연구원, 273pp
  3. 해양수산부, 2006, 해양환경영향평가센터 운영 활성화를 위한 워크샵, 60pp
  4. Suzuki T., 2003, Economic and geographic backgrounds of land reclamation in Japanese ports, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 47, 226-229 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00405-8
  5. 해양수산부, 2006, 해양수산통계연보, 248-251
  6. 해양수산부, 2007, 제2차 공유수면매립 10개년 기본계획 변경
  7. 국립수산과학원, 2005, 연근해 주요 어업자원의 생태와 어장, 397pp
  8. Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O'Neill R. V., Paruelo J., Raskin R. G., Sutton P., van den Belt M., 1997, The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387, 253-260 https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
  9. Zhao B., Kreuter U, Li B., Ma Z, Chen J., Nakagoshi N., 2004, An ecosystem service value assessment of land-use change on Chongming Island, China, Land Use Policy, 21(2), 139-148 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.003
  10. 박창희, 이상훈, 2004, 갯벌의 기능과 가치에 대한 환경학적 고찰, 환경영향평가, 13(2), 87-101
  11. 日本海洋學會, 沿岸環境調査マニュアル II: 水質.微生物篇, 386pp
  12. 목진용, 윤성순, 박수진, 2006, 해양환경영향평가제도 도입방안, 한국해양수산개발원, 122pp
  13. 해양수산부, 2007, 해양부문 환경영향평가 활성화를 위한 워크샵, 54pp
  14. OECD, 2003, OECD Environmental indicators: development, measurement and use, 37pp
  15. UN, 2001, Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies, 319pp
  16. 윤성순, 장학봉, 최지연, 2004, 해양부문 환경영향평가 제도의 개선방안 연구, 한국해양수산개발원, 115pp

Cited by

  1. Characteristics and Reasonable Management Approaches of Coastal Reclamation in Korean vol.15, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7846/JKOSMEE.2012.15.3.227