An Analysis of the Transient's Social Behavior in the Radiological Emergency Planning Zone

방사선 비상계획구역에서의 일시거주자의 사회행동 특성 분석

  • Bang, Sun-Young (Radiation & Safety Group, Korea Electric Power Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Gab-Bock (Radiation & Safety Group, Korea Electric Power Research Institute) ;
  • Chung, Yang-Geun (Radiation & Safety Group, Korea Electric Power Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Eun (Department of Public Administration, Chungbuk National University)
  • 방선영 (한국전력공사 전력연구원 방사선안전그룹) ;
  • 이갑복 (한국전력공사 전력연구원 방사선안전그룹) ;
  • 정양근 (한국전력공사 전력연구원 방사선안전그룹) ;
  • 이재은 (충북대학교 행정학과)
  • Published : 2007.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the social behavior, especially, the evacuation-related social behavior, of the transients in the radiological emergency planning zone(EPZ) of nuclear power plants. So, the meaning and kinds of the evacuation and the significance of the trip generation time(TGT) have been reviewed. The characteristics of the social behavior of the transient around Ulchin, Wolsong and Kori sites was analyzed through field surveys by using the questionnaire. The major findings of this research implications are as follows. First, for securing the safe evacuation, the alternatives to effectively provide the information on the evacuation warning may be prepared. Second, it is necessary to establish the education and training of transient's evacuation. Third, it is needed that the cause and background of the evacuation refusal are identified and the new response plan to secure transient's safety is prepared.

References

  1. Kharbanda OP, Stallworthy EA. Planning for Emergencies: Lessons from the Chemical Industry. Long Range Planning. 1989;22(1):83-89 https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(89)90054-X
  2. 김시곤. 재해에 대응한 대피(Evacuation) 방안 수립. 방재연 구. 2002;4(1):40-45
  3. USNRC NUREG-0654 Rev. 1. Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants. 1980
  4. 전인영, 이재기. 울진원전 방사선비상계획구역에 대한 소개 시간 예측. 방사선방어학회지. 2002;27(3):189-198
  5. 정양근, 이갑복, 방선영, 김성민, 이은미. 울진원전 방사선 비상계획구역 내의 주민소개시간 예측. 방사성폐기물학회지. 2005;3(4):359-372
  6. 이재은. 우리나라 위기관리 대응기능 개선방향에 관한 연구: 위기관리 조직과 법규분석을 통해. 한국정책학회보. 1998;7(2):229-252
  7. Perry RW. Comprehensive Emergency Management: Evacuating Threatened Populations. Greenwich. CT; JAI Press Inc. 1985
  8. Drabek TE. Disaster Evacuation Responses by Tourists and Other Types of Transients. International Journal of Public Administration. 1999;22(5):655-677 https://doi.org/10.1080/01900699908525400
  9. Cigler BA. Emergency Management and Public Administration, In: Michael T. Charles and John Choon K. Kim. eds. Crisis Management: A Casebook. Springfield, IL: Thomas Publisher. 1988
  10. Stubbart CI. Improving the Quality of Crisis Thinking. The Columbia Journal of World Business. 1987;22(1):89-99
  11. Hy RJ and Waugh WL, Jr. The Function of Emergency Management, In: William L. Waugh, Jr. and Ronald John Hy. eds. Handbook of Emergency Management: Programs and Policies Dealing with Major Hazards and Disasters. Westport, CT; Greenwood Press. 1990
  12. Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Chicago, IL; G.&C. Merriam Co. 1977