DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Physicochemical and Sensory Properties of Branded Pork by Feeding Probiotics and Crossbred between Korean Native and Wild Pigs

생균제 급여와 재래돼지와 멧돼지의 교배에 의해 브랜드화 된 돈육의 물리화학적 및 관능적 특성 비교

  • Published : 2007.02.28

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate the physicochemical and sensory properties of branded pork by feeding probiotics and crossbred between Korean native and wild pigs. Crude protein contents showed in order of Brand A>Brand B>control (P<0.05), while crude fat contents showed Brand A to be lower (P<0.05) than control and Brand B. The pH of Brand B was significantly higher (P<0.05) than control and Brand A. Cooking loss (%) showed Brand A to be lower (P<0.05) than control, but there was not different between Brand A and Brand B. Lightness value showed Brand B to be lower (P<0.05) than control and Brand A. Brand A had the highest (P<0.05) springiness value. For fatty acid profile among branded pork loins, the saturated fatty acid (SFA) content was highest (P<0.05) for Brand A, but lowest (P<0.05) for Brand B. Brand B had the highest (P<0.05) unsaturated fatty acid (USFA) and essential fatty acid (EFA), USFA : SFA ratio, EFA : SFA ratio, and EFA : USFA ratio. Essential amino acid contents of Brand B was higher (P<0.05) than control and Brand A.

Keywords

Branded pork;Physicochemical properties;Sensory properties;Fatty acid;Amino acid

References

  1. AOAC. 1969. Official methods of analysis. 17th ed, Association Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, Ch.45 pp. 82
  2. AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed, Association Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, pp. 931
  3. AOAC. 2000. Official methods of analysis. 17th ed, Association Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, Ch.4 pp. 5
  4. Bendall, J. R. and Swatland, H. J. 1988. A review of the relationships of pH with physical aspects of pork quality. Meat Sci. 24:85-126 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(88)90052-6
  5. Choi, S. C. and Youn, G. Y. 2002. Quantification analysis on the buying behavior of functional fresh meat. Kor. J. Agri. Manage. & Policy. 29:659-674
  6. Department of Health 1994. Nutritional aspects of cardiovascular disease. Report on health and social subjects No. 46. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office
  7. Flores, M., Alasnier, C., Aristoy, M. C., Navarro, J. L., Gandemer, G. and Toldra, F. 1996. Activity of aminopeptidase and lipolytic enzymes in five skeletal muscles with various oxidative patterns. J. Sci. Food Agric. 70:127-130 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199601)70:1<127::AID-JSFA475>3.0.CO;2-9
  8. Han, S. I. and Choi, S. C. 2002. The promotion of consumption on fresh-meat brand. Kor. J. Agri. Manage. & Policy. 29:298-315
  9. Isabel, B., Lopez-Bote, C. J., Hoz, L., Timón, M., Gracia, C. and Ruiz, J. 2003. Effects of feeding elevated concentrations of monounsaturated fatty acids and vitamin E to swine on characteristics of dry cured hams. Meat Sci. 64:475-482 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00225-5
  10. Jeremiah. L. E., Gibson, J. P., Gibson, L. L., Ball, R. O., Aker, C. and Fortin, A. 1999. The influence of breed, gender, and PSS (Halothane) genotype on meat quality, cooking loss, and palatability of pork. Food Research International. 32:59-71
  11. Kim, Y. B., Rho, J. H., Richardson, I. and Wood, J. 2000. Comparison of physicochemical properties of pork from 4 different pig breeds. J. Anim. Sci. & Technol. (Kor). 42:195-202
  12. Enfalt, A. C., Lundstrom, K., Hansson, I., Lundeheim, N. and Nystrom, P. E. 1997. Effects of outdoor rearing and sire breed (Duroc or Yorkshire) on carcass composition and sensory and technological meat quality. Meat Sci. 45:1-15 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(96)00101-5
  13. Maribo, H., Olsen, E. V., Patricia, B. G., Anders J. N. and Anders, K. 1998. Effect of early post- mortem cooling on temperature, pH fall and meat quality in pigs. Meat Sci. 50:115-129 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00022-9
  14. Rossi, V., Denoyer, C. and Berdague, J. L. 1995. Effect of storage in air on cooked beef meat: analysis of desorbed volatile compounds. Sci. Alim. 15:381-392
  15. SAS. 1999. SAS/STAT Software for PC. Release 6.11, SAS Institute, Cary, NC. USA
  16. Sather, A. P., Jones, S. D. M., Tong, A. K. W. and Murray, A. C. 1991. Halothane genotype by weight interactions on pig meat quality. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 71:645-658 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas91-080
  17. .Warriss, P. D., Brown, S. N., Nute, G. R., Knowles, T. G., Edwards, J. E., Perry, A. M. and Johnson, S. P. 1995. Potential interactions between the effects of preslaughter stress and post-mortem electrical stimulation of the carcasses on meat quality in pigs. Meat Sci. 41:55-68 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(94)00055-C
  18. Wood, J. D., Richardson, R. I., Nute, G. R., Fisher, A. V., Campo, M. M. and Kasapidou, E. 2003. Effect of fatty acids on meat quality: a review. Meat Sci. 66:21-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00022-6
  19. Lee, M. H., Kim, T. W., Han, I. M., Kang, Y. S., Jin, S. K. and Kim, I. S. 2005. Consumer's purchase behaviors and perception of branded pork in Gyengnam. Kor. J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 25:271- 276
  20. Yang, S. J., Kim, Y. K., Hyon, J. S., Moon, Y. H. and Jung, I. C. 2005. Amino acid contents and meat quality properties on the loin from crossbred black and crossbred pigs reared in Jejudo. Kor. J. Food Sci. Ani. Resour. 25:7-12
  21. Yoo, Y. C. 1998. Studies on the consumer's purchase behavior of brand pork. M.S. thesis, Korea Univ., Seoul, Korea
  22. Meat journal. 2006. 돈육브랜드 지원 및 육성대책. 8월호, pp 52-62

Cited by

  1. Proximate Composition and Physico-chemical Characteristics of Berkshire Pork by Gender vol.27, pp.2, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2007.27.2.137