Halitosis and Related Factors among Rural Residents

농촌지역 주민들의 구취실태와 유발요인

  • Lee, Young-Ok (Dept. of Dental Hygiene, Daejeon Health Science College) ;
  • Hong, Jung-Pyo (Dept. of Oral Medicine, College of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Tae-Yong (Dept. of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam University)
  • 이영옥 (대전보건대학 치위생과) ;
  • 홍정표 (경희대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 이태용 (충남대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Published : 2007.06.30

Abstract

This study was conducted through an interview process in which questionnaires were administered to 293 people. The questionnaires related to the behaviors of oral hygiene care, and disease history related to halitosis, and status of halitosis, halitosis measurement, oral examination, and caries activity tests such as the snyder test, Salivary flow rate test, and Salivary buffering capacity test. Our sample was taken from 293 rural residents within the period from 4th to 21st of January 2006. This was done in order to provide basic data to prepare both policies of halitosis prevention and a device to efficiently measure halitosis status and investigate the factors related therein. The major findings of this study results are as follows: 1. As for frequency of tooth brushing, twice a day occupied the greatest portion at 46.1 % Women exceeded men in frequency of tooth brushing. Tongue brushing everyday produced a 25.6 % result among subjects and The use of auxiliary oral hygiene devices occupied 9.2 %. 2. As for degree of usual self-awareness of halitosis: 62.5 %. This result also demonstrate that the severest time of self-awareness in regards to halitosis is wake up time in the morning. The time period produced the highest portion of 72.7 % in times of self-awareness. In terms of the area in which halitosis was observed, gum resulted in 23.0 %. As for types of halitosis, fetid smell was the most frequent at 37.2 %. 3. As for the result of halitosis measurement, values of OG less than 50 ppm occupied 54.3 % and $50{\sim}100ppm$ occupied 41.6 %. As for $NH_3$ values, $20{\sim}60ppm$ showed the highest value range of 52.6 %. 4. As for OG per disease history related to halitosis, values of OG were significantly high in the ranges of $50{\sim}100ppm$ within family history groups of food impaction by dental caries, diabetes mellitus and halitosis. As for values of $NH_3$, there showed a significant difference in respiratory system disease groups. 5 Value range of OG per ordinary halitosis self-awareness degree: values ranging less than 50 ppm were recorded at 55.9 % from the group realizing not aware of smell. 57.5 % from groups only realizing sometimes, while values range of $50{\sim}100ppm$ were recorded at 52.0 % from groups always aware of smell. 63.6 % from groups always strongly aware of smell. Meanwhile as for the values ranges of $NH_3$, $20{\sim}60ppm$. they occupied high portions for all groups of exams. 6. Values of OG per oral examination: the more pulp-exposed teeth and food impaction and the higher the tongue plaque index, values of OG increased within the range of $50{\sim}100ppm$. As for values of $NH_3$, the more prosthetic teeth and the higher the tongue plaque index, this value increased significantly, and the values increased up to no less than 60 ppm for groups of mandibular partial denture. 7. Within the realm of caries activity test: as for the Snyder test, high activity was highest by 43.0 % wherewith the higher the activity of acidogenic bacteria the higher the OG values. As for the salivary flow rate test, the number of cases below 8.0 ml showed the highest tendency by 62.5 %. The larger the salivary flow rate the more decreased OG values distribution. As for the salivary buffering capacity test, $6{\sim}10$ drops of 0.1N lactic acid showed the overwhelming trend by 58.7 % whereby the higher the salivary buffering capacity the greater distribution occupancy ratio of OG values below 50 ppm which is scentless to on ordinary person. 8. As for the correlation between oral environment and halitosis, OG showed the positive correlation with pulp exposed teeth, filled teeth, present teeth, tongue plaque index, and food impaction, while the negative correlation with salivary flow rate and prosthetic teeth. $NH_3$ showed a positive correlation with prosthetic teeth and frequency of tooth brushing, while decayed teeth was negative correlation. 9. As for the multiple regression analysis result, there have been selected female, pulp exposed teeth, prosthetic teeth, food impaction, salivary flow rate, tongue plaque index and severe activities in the Snyder test as factors affecting OG wherein explanatory power on it was 45.1 %. There have been selected females, pulp exposed teeth, tongue plaque index, and prosthetic teeth as factors affecting on $NH_3$ wherein explanatory power on it was 6.6 %. With the aforementioned results in mind, the status of halitosis among rural residents is considered to bare a close relation with oral environments and other factors related to halitosis such as the Snyder test from caries activity test, and salivary flow rate test. For the prevention of halitosis of residents in rural areas, we have to focus on correct tooth brushing methods and tongue brushing, with using auxiliary oral hygiene devices to remove fur of tongue plaque and food impaction. Also, when the cause and ingredients of halitosis are diverse and complex, in order to analyze exactly the factors of individual halitosis development, we need continuous and systematic study in order to provide rural residents with programs of oral hygiene education and encourage the use of dental hygienists in public health centers.

References

  1. 홍정표. 구취와 구강질환. 대한치과의사협회지 1998; 36(1):29-31
  2. 홍정표. 구취. 경희의학 2000;16(1):4-8
  3. Rosenberg M, Kozlovsky A, Gelernter I et al. Self-estimation of oral malodor. J Dent Res 1995;74: 1577-1582 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740091201
  4. Rosenberg M. Clinical assessment of bad breath: current concepts. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127(4): 475-482 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0239
  5. Yaegaki K, Coil JM. Examination, Classification, and treatment of halitosis Clinical Perspectives. J Can Dent Assoc 2000;66(5):257-261
  6. 이건수. 한국인의 구취실태에 대한 역학조사연구. 대한구강보건학회지 2005;29(3):368-384
  7. 허혜영, 신승철, 조자원, 박광식. 성인에서 구취실태와 요인들 간의 상관관계에 관한 연구. 대한구강보건학회지 2005;29(3):368-384
  8. 최재갑. 구취의 구강외 원인. 대한치과의사협회지 1998; 36(1):32-35
  9. Tonzetich J. Production and origin of oral malodor. A review of mechanisms and methods of analysis. J Periodontal 1977;48(1):13-20 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1977.48.1.13
  10. Yaegaki K, Suetaka, T. periodontal disease and precursors of oral malodorous component. J Dent 1989; 39: 733-741
  11. Eli I, Baht R, Koriat H, Rosenberg M. Self-perception of breath odor. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132(5):621-626 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0239
  12. Spielman AI, Bivona P, Rifkin BR. Halitosis. A common oral problem. J Dent 1996;62(10):36-42
  13. 함동선, 홍정표. 구취와 구강위생과의 관계에 대한 예비 실험. 대한구강내과학회지 1998;23(3):271-274
  14. 조자원, 신승철, 서현석. 허세정기구의 형태에 따른 인공설태제거효과에 관한 비교실 연구. 대한구강보건학회지 2003;27(1):75-83
  15. Miyazaki H, Sakuo S, Katoh Y, Takehara T. Correlation between volatile sulfur compounds and certain oral health measurements in the general population. J Periodontol 1995;66(8):679-684 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1995.66.8.679
  16. 박종훈, 한경수, 김문규. 수종의 구취처치법의 구취감소 효과에 관한 연구. 대한구강내과학회지 2000;25(1): 41-49
  17. Kazor CE, Loesche WJ. Bacterial characterization of the dorsal tongue surface. Current Infectious Disease Reports 2003;5(3):220-226 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-003-0077-8
  18. Lee SK, Lee SW, Chung SC, Kim YK, Kho HS. Analysis of residual saliva and minor salivary gland secretion in patients with dry mouth. Arch Oral Biol 2002;47:637-641 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(02)00053-5
  19. Tonzetich J, Jonson PW. Chemical analysis of thiol, disulphide and total sulphur content of human saliva. Arch Oral Biol 1977;22:125-131 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(77)90089-9
  20. 손원영, 전양현, 이진용, 조한국, 홍정표. 타액선 기능이 구취에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 대한구강내과학회지 1998;23(4):353-357
  21. Young K, Oxtoby A, Field EA. Halitosis: a review. Dental Update 1993;20:57-61
  22. Bosy A, Kulkarni GV, Rosenberg M, McCulloch CAG. Relationship of oral malodor to periodontitis: Evidence of independence in discrete subpopulations. J Periodontol 1994;65(1):37-46 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.1.37
  23. 예방치위생학 교재개발연구회. 예방치위생학실습. 서울, 2002, 고문사, pp. 60,120-121
  24. Yaegaki K, Sanada K. Biochemical and clinical factors influencing oral malodor in periodontal patients J Periodontol 1992;63:783-789 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.9.783
  25. Kazor CE. Background in the Microbiology and Treatment of oral malodor. In:Kazor CE. Microbiology and treatment of oral malodor. ProQuest Information and Learning Company;2003. pp. 1-60
  26. Loesche WJ, De Boever EH. Strategies to identify the main microbial contributors to oral malodour. In: Rosenberg M (ed). Bad breath: research perspectives. Ramot Publishing Tel Aviv University; 1995. pp. 41-54
  27. Morita M, Wang HL. Relationship between sulcular sulfide levels and oral malodor in subjects with periodontal disease. J Periodontol 2001;72(1):79-84. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.1.79
  28. 권진희, 장문택, 류성훈, 김형섭. 구취와 치주질환의 상관성에 관한 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2000;30(1):203-208
  29. Kaizu T, Tsunoda M, Aoki H, Kimura K. Analysis of volatile sulfur compounds in mouth air by gas chromatography. Bull Tokyo Dent coll 1978;19(2): 43-52
  30. 이채훈. 휘발성 황화합물과 주요 구취유발인자와의 관 련성에 관한 연구. 서울대학교대학원 치의학박사 학위 논문, 2003
  31. 한경수. 구취감각에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구. 구강내과학회지 2002;27(2):255-265
  32. Amano A, Yoshida Y, Oho T, Koga T. Monitoring ammonia to assess halitosis. Oral Med 2002; 94(6): 692-696
  33. 지윤정. 치주상태에 따른 구취 요인분석에 관한 조사연구. 단국대학교 대학원 치의학석사 학위논문, 2004
  34. 장수경. 구취와 타액 내 아미노산의 상관성 비교 연구. 부산대학교 대학원 치의학석사 학위논문, 2004
  35. Sterer N, Bar-Ness R, Rosenberg M. $\beta$-galatosidase activity in saliva is associated with oral malodor. J Dent Res 2002;81(3):182-185 https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100308
  36. 박문수, 김영구, 정성창, 이승우. 한국인 구취발생 빈도에 관한 연구. 대한구강내과학회지 2001;26(2):107-114
  37. 김기은. 타액분비와 구강관리 및 구취와의 관계. 중앙간호논문집 2001;5(2);55-60
  38. Kazor CE, Loesche WJ. Longitudinal Oral Malodor Treatment Evaluation. Current Infectious Disease Reports 2003;5:110-134
  39. O'Reilly RA, Motley CH. Breath odor after disulfiram. JAMA 1997;238:2600 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.238.24.2600
  40. 김재곤, 김영신, 백병주, 양연미. 타액 우식 관련 검사와 치아우식 경험과의 관계에 관한 연구. 대한소아치과학회지 2005;32(1):67-74
  41. 대한구강내과학회. 구강내과학개론. 서울, 2001, 신흥인터내셔날, pp. 64-67,128-133
  42. 강기호, 고명연, 고흥섭, 김관식, 김기석. 노인치과학. 서울, 2001, 지성출판사. pp. 96
  43. 김영구, 이승우, 정성창, 김형석. 구취측정에 관한 예비 연구. 대한구강내과학회지 1997;22(2):233-239
  44. 김기석. 구취의 원인질환. DI저널 월간의약정보 1992; 18(10):38-41
  45. 보건복지부. 2003년 국민구강건강실태조사. 2004, pp. 83-84