DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Restriction of Metabolizable Energy in Broiler Growers and Its Impact on Grower and Breeder Performance

  • Sunder, G. Skyam (Project Directorate on Poultry) ;
  • Kumar, Ch. Vijaya (Project Directorate on Poultry) ;
  • Panda, A.K. (Project Directorate on Poultry) ;
  • Raju, M.V.L.N. (Project Directorate on Poultry) ;
  • Rao, S.V. Rama (Project Directorate on Poultry) ;
  • Gopinath, N.C.S. (Project Directorate on Poultry) ;
  • Reddy, M.R. (Project Directorate on Poultry)
  • Received : 2006.11.01
  • Accepted : 2007.04.03
  • Published : 2007.08.01

Abstract

Metabolizable energy (ME) required for basal metabolism, activity and growth was considered as the criterion for targeting specific increases in body weight (100 g/week) of broiler chicks during the grower phase (5-20 weeks) and its impact was evaluated on breeder performance. Broiler female chicks (460) from a synthetic dam line were randomly distributed to 4 test groups with 23 replicates of 5 birds each and housed in cages. The first group (ME-100) was offered a calculated amount of ME by providing a measured quantity of grower diet (160 g protein and 2,600 kcal ME/kg) which increased with age and weight gain (133-294 kcal/bird/day). The other three groups were offered 10 or 20% less ME (ME-90 and ME-80, respectively) and 10% excess ME (ME-110) over the control group (ME-100). From 21 weeks of age, a single breeder diet (170 g protein and 2,600 kcal ME/kg) was uniformly fed to all groups and the impact of grower ME restriction on breeder performance evaluated up to 58 weeks. The targeted body weight gain of 1,600 g in a 16-week period was achieved by pullets of the ME-100 group almost one week earlier by gaining 8.7 g more weight per week. However, pullets in the ME-90 group gained 1,571 g during the same period, which was closer to the targeted weight. At 20 weeks of age, the conversion efficiency of feed (5.21-5.37), ME (13.9-14.1 kcal/g weight gain) and protein (0.847-0.871 g/g weight gain), eviscerated meat yield, giblet and tibia weights were not influenced by ME restriction, but the weights of abdominal fat and liver were higher with increased ME intake. Reduction of ME by 10% in the grower period significantly delayed sexual maturity (169.3 d), but increased egg production (152.5 /bird) with better persistency. Improved conversion efficiency of feed, ME and protein per g egg content were also observed in this group up to 56 weeks. The fertility and hatchability at 58 weeks of age were higher in the ME-90 group compared to the control and 10% excess ME feeding. In conclusion, the present study revealed the possibility of achieving targeted weight gain in broiler growers by feeding measured quantities of ME during the rearing period with consequential benefits in breeder performance.

Keywords

Metabolizable Energy;Restriction;Broiler Growers;Breeder Performance

References

  1. Hudson, H. A., J. L. Wilson, G. N. Rowland, R. J. Buhr and W. M. Britton. 1999. Feed restriction affects bone properties of the broiler breeder pullet femur. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 8:400-407. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/8.4.400
  2. Katanbaf, M. N., E. A. Dunnington and P. B. Siegel. 1989a. Restricted feeding in early and late-feeding chickens. 1. Growth and physiological responses. Poult. Sci. 68:344-351. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0680344
  3. Katanbaf, M. N., E. A. Dunnington and P. B. Siegel. 1989b. Restricted feeding in early and Late-Feathering Chickens. 2. Reproductive Response. Poult. Sci. 68:352-358. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0680352
  4. Hocking, P. M., D. Waddington, M. A. Walker and A. B. Gilbert. 1989. Control of the development of the ovarian follicular hierarchy in broiler breeder pullets by food restriction during rearing. Br. Poult. Sci. 30:161-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668908417134
  5. Neuman, S. L., R. H. Harms and G. B. Russell. 1998. An innovative change in energy restriction for broiler breeder hens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 7:328-335. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/7.3.328
  6. Nir, I., Z. Nitsan, E. A. Dunnington and P. B. Siegel. 1996. Aspects of food intake restriction in young domestic fowl: metabolic and genetic considerations. World's Poult. Sci. J. 52:251-266. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19960019
  7. Richards, M. P. 2003. Genetic regulation of feed intake and energy balance in poultry. Poult. Sci. 82:907-916. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.6.907
  8. Renema, R. A., F. E. Robinson, M. Newcomb and R. I. Mckay. 1999a. Effects of body weight and feed allocation during sexual maturation in broiler breeder hens, 1. Growth and carcass characteristics. Poult. Sci. 78:619-628. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.5.619
  9. Pinchasov, Y. and D. Galili. 1990. Energy requirement of feedrestricted broiler breeder pullets. Poult. Sci. 69:1792-1795. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0691792
  10. Renema, R. A. and F. E. Robinson. 2004. Defining normal: comparison of feed restriction and full feeding of female broiler breeders. World's Poult. Sci. J. 60:508-522. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS200434
  11. Yu, M. W., F. E. Robinson and A. R. Rubble. 1992a. Effect of feed allowance during rearing and breeding of female broiler breeders. 1.Growth and carcass characteristics. Poult. Sci. 71:1739-1749. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0711739
  12. Scott, M. L., M. C. Nesheim and R. J. Young. 1982. Energy chapter II. Nutrition of the chicken. pp. 7-57. (M. L. Scott and Associates, Publishers Ithaca, New York).
  13. Whitehead, C. C. 2000. Nutrition: the integrative science. Br. Poult. Sci. 41:5-15.
  14. Robinson, F. E., J. L. Wilson, M. W. Yu, G. M. Fasenko and T. Hardin 1993. The relationship between body weight and reproductive efficiency in meat-type chickens. Poult. Sci. 72:912-922. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0720912
  15. SAS Institute. 1994. SAS User's Guide, Version 6.12 SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
  16. Robinson, F. E., N. A. Robinson and T. A. Scott. 1991. Reproductive performance, growth and body composition of full-fed versus feed restricted broiler breeder hens. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 71:549-556. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas91-065
  17. Robinson, F. E., N. A. Robinson and R. T. Hardin. 1995. The effects of 20-week body weight and feed allocation during early lay on female broiler breeders. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 4:203-210. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/4.2.203
  18. Yu, M. W., F. E. Robinson and R. J. Etches. 1992b. Effect of feed allowance during rearing and breeding on female broiler breeders.3.Ovarian steroid genesis. Poult. Sci. 71:1762-1767. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0711762
  19. Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11:1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  20. Bowmaker, J. E. E. and R. M. Gous. 1989. Quantification of reproductive changes and nutrient requirements of broiler breeder pullets at sexual maturity. Br. Poult. Sci. 30:663-675. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668908417189
  21. Denbow, D. M. 1994. Appetite and its control. Poult. Sci. Rev. 5:209-229.
  22. Brake, J., J. D. Garlich and E. D. Peebles. 1985. Effect of protein and energy intake by broiler breeders during the pre-breeder transition period on subsequent reproductive performance. Poult. Sci. 64:2335-2340. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0642335
  23. Association of Official Analytical Chemist. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis, 16th ed. (Washington, DC, AOAC).
  24. Bokkers, E. A. M. and P. Koene. 2003. Eating behavior, and preprandial and postprandial correlation in male broilers and layer chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 44:538-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660310001616165
  25. Goerzen, P. R., W. L. Julsrud and F. E. Robinson. 1996. Duration of fertility in ad libitum and feed- restricted caged broiler breeders. Poult. Sci. 75:962-965. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750962
  26. Hocking, P. M. 1993. Welfare of broiler breeder and layer females subjected to food and water control during rearing: Quantifying the degree of restriction. Br. Poult. Sci. 34:53-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669308417562
  27. Hocking, P. M. and C. C. Whitehead. 1990. Relationships between body composition, ovarian structure and reproduction in nature females of genetically lean or fat broilers given different food allowances. Br. Poult. Sci. 31:319-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669008417262
  28. Hocking, P. M., R. Bernard and G. W. Robertson. 2002. Effects of low dietary protein and different allocations of food during rearing and restricted feeding after peak rate of lay on egg production, fertility and hatchability in female broiler breeders. Br. Poult. Sci. 43:94-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660120109908
  29. Katanbaf, M. N., E. A. Dunnington and P. B. Siegel. 1989c. Restricted feeding in early and late-feathering chickens.3.Organ size and carcass composition. Poult. Sci. 68:359-368. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0680359
  30. Lopez, G. and S. Lesson. 1995. Response of broiler breeders to low-protein diets. Adult breeder performance. Poult. Sci. 74:685-695. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0740685
  31. Renema, R. A., F. E. Robinson, J. A. Proudman, M. Newcomb and R. I. Mckay. 1999b. Effects of body weight and feed allocation during sexual maturation in broiler breeder hens. 2. Ovarian morphology and plasma hormone profiles. Poult. Sci. 78:629-639. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.5.629
  32. Lilburn, M. S. and D. J. Myers-Miller. 1990. Dietary effects on body composition and subsequent production characteristics in broiler breeder hens. Poult. Sci. 69:1126-1132. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0691126
  33. Bennett, C. D. and S. Lesson. 1990. Body composition of the broiler-breeder pullet. Poult. Sci. 69:715-720. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0690715

Cited by

  1. Energy Restriction in Broiler Breeders during Rearing and Laying Periods and its Influence on Body Weight Gain, Conversion Efficiency of Nutrients, Egg Production and Hatchability vol.45, pp.4, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.45.273