DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Centrality Measures for Bibliometric Network Analysis

계량서지적 네트워크 분석을 위한 중심성 척도에 관한 연구

  • 이재윤 (경기대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Published : 2006.09.01

Abstract

Recently, some bibliometric researchers tried to use the centrality analysis methods and the centrality measures which are standard tools in social network analysis. However the traditional centrality measures originated from social network analysis could not deal with weighted networks such as co-citation networks. In this study. new centrality measures for analyzing bibliometric networks with link weights are suggested and applied to three real network data, including an author co-citation network, a co-word network, and a website co-link network. The results of centrality analyses in these three cases can be regarded as Promising the usefulness of suggested centrality measures, especially in analyzing the Position and influence of each node in a bibliometric network.

Keywords

Bibliometrics;Network Analysis;Centrality Analysis;Centrality Measures;Weighted Networks;Author Co-citation Analysis;Co-word Analysis;Co-link Analysis

References

  1. 이은숙, 정영미. 2002. 복수저자를 고려한 동시인용분석 연구: 정보학과 컴퓨터과학을 대상으로. '지식처리연구', 3(2): 1-26
  2. Chen, C. 2005. 'The centrality of pivotal points in the evolution of scientific networks.' International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces(IUI 2005), pp. 98-105
  3. Ding, Y, G. G. Chowdhury, and S. Foo. 2001. 'Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis.' Information Processing & Management, 37(6): 817-842
  4. Doreian, P. 1985. 'A measure of standing of journals in stratified networks.' Scientometrics, 8: 341-363
  5. Gray, S. A., and R. O'Shea, M. E. Petty, and J. Loonsk. 1998. 'The western New York health resources project: developing access to local health information.' Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 86(3): 335–339
  6. Marion, L. S., E. Garfield, L. L. Hargens, and L. A. Lievrouw. 2003. 'Social network analysis and citation network analysis: complementary approaches to the study of scientific communication.' Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 40(1): 486-487
  7. Otte, E., and R. Rousseau. 2002. 'Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences.' Journal of Information Science, 28(6): 441-454
  8. Price, D. J. de Solla. 1963. Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.
  9. Schubert, Andras. 2002. 'The web of scientometrics.' Scientometrics, 53(1): 3-20
  10. Schvaneveldt, R. W.(ed). 1990. Pathfinder Associative Networks: Studies in Knowledge Organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  11. Yoshikane, F., and K. Kageura. 2004. 'Comparative analysis of coauthorship networks of different domains: the growth and change of networks.' Scientometrics, 60(3): 435-446
  12. Zuccala, Alesia. 2006. 'Modeling the invisible college.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2): 152-168
  13. Bonacich, P. 1972. 'Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification.' Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2: 113-120
  14. Callon, M., J. P. Courtial, & F. Laville. 1991. 'Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry.' Scientometrics, 22(1): 153-205
  15. Freeman, L. C. 1979. 'Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification.' Social Networks, 1, 215-239
  16. 정동열, 최윤미. 1999. 웹 정보원의 동시인용분석에 관한 실험적 연구. '정보관리학회지', 16(2): 7-25
  17. Doreian, P., and T. J. Fararo. 1985. 'Structural equivalence in a journal network.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(1): 28-37
  18. Dosa, M. L. 1982. 'Information transfer in gerontology and health: a centralized and a decentralized model.' Special Collection, 1(3-4): 53-72. Quoted in Gray et al(1998)
  19. Nagpaul, P. S. 2002. 'Visualizing cooperation networks of elite institutions in India.' Scientometrics, 54(2): 213-228
  20. Haythornthwaite, Caroline, 1996. Social network analysis: an approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library and Information Research, 18: 323-342
  21. Glnzel, Wolfgang, et al. 2003. - An Analysis Based on Publications and Patents.
  22. National Library of Medicine. 1978. Development and Evaluation of Health Information Sharing. NY: Syracuse University School of Information Studies. Unpublished report. 유사라(1991)에서 재인용
  23. Sonnenwald, Diane H., and Linda G. Pierce. 2000. 'Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts: interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks and contested collaboration in command and control.' Information Processing & Management, 36(3): 461-479
  24. Bollen, Johan, Herbert Van de Sompel, Joan A. Smith, and Rick Luce. 2005. 'Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data.' Information Processing & Management, 41(6): 1419-1440
  25. Dastidar, Prabir G. 2004. 'Ocean science & technology research across the countries: A global scenario.' Scientometrics, 59 (1): 15-27
  26. Dosa, M. 1994. The Health Information Sharing Project(HISP): Summary of Facts. Syracuse. NY: Syracuse University School of Information Studies. Unpublished report. Quoted in Gray et al (1998)
  27. Haythornthwaite, Caroline. 2006. 'Learning and knowledge networks in interdisciplinary collaborations.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8): 1079-1092
  28. 이재윤. 2006. 지적 구조의 규명을 위한 네트워크 형성 방식에 관한 연구. '한국문헌정보학회지', 40(2): 333-355
  29. Hersberger, Julie. 2003. 'A qualitative approach to examining information transfer via social networks among homeless populations.' New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 4(1): 95-108
  30. Liu, X., J. Bollen, M. L. Nelson, and H. Van de Sompel. 2005. 'Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community.' Information Processing & Management, 41(6): 1462-1480
  31. Newman, M. E. J. 2004a. 'Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration.' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101: 5200-5205
  32. Page, L., S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. 1998. The Pagerank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. Technical report, Stanford University Database Group. Available at
  33. 유영준. 2003. 문헌정보학의 지식 구조에 관한 연구. 박사학위논문, 연세대학교 대학원
  34. Granovetter, Mark. 1973. 'The strength of weak tie.' American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380
  35. Knoke, D., and R. S. Burt. 1983. 'Prominence.' In R. S. Burt and M. J. Minor(eds.), Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction, SAGE Publications, pp. 195-222
  36. 유사라. 1991. 네트웍 연구의 사회적 접근과 분석이론. '도서관학', 20: 297-330
  37. de Nooy, W., A. Mrvar, and V. Batagelj. 2005. Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge University Press.
  38. Scott, J. P. 2000. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: SAGE Publications
  39. White, H. D., and B. C. Griffith. 1981. 'Author cocitation: a literature measure of intellectual structure.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32: 163-171
  40. Crane, D. 1969. 'Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the invisible college hypothesis.' American Sociological Review, 34, 335-352
  41. Crane, D. 1972. Invisible Colleges: Discussion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  42. Newman, M. E. J. 2004b. 'Analysis of weighted networks.' Physical Review E, 70, 056131

Cited by

  1. An Analytical Study on Research Trends of Digital Curation: Focused on Library and Information Science vol.32, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.1.265
  2. A Comparative Study on the Centrality Measures for Analyzing Research Collaboration Networks vol.31, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.153
  3. Journal Co-citation Analysis for Library Services in Pharmaceutics vol.43, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2012.43.1.159
  4. Research Trend Analysis Using Bibliographic Information and Citations of Cloud Computing Articles: Application of Social Network Analysis vol.20, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2014.20.1.195
  5. A Bibliometric Analysis on Twitter Research vol.31, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.293
  6. A Study on Opinion Mining of Newspaper Texts based on Topic Modeling vol.47, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.4.315
  7. Profiling and Co-word Analysis of Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language Domain vol.30, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.195
  8. Examining the Intellectual Structure of a Medical Informatics Journal with Author Co-citation Analysis and Co-word Analysis vol.30, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.2.207
  9. A Study on the Intellectual Structure of Library and Information Science in Korea by Author Bibliographic Coupling Analysis vol.30, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.031
  10. The Distinct Impact Dimensions of the Prestige Indices in Author Citation Networks vol.33, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.2.061
  11. A Comparison Study on the Weighted Network Centrality Measures of tnet and WNET vol.30, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.241
  12. Collaboration Networks and Document Networks in Informetrics Research from 2001 to 2011: Finding Influential Nations, Institutions, Documents vol.30, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.179
  13. Intellectual Structure and Infrastructure of Informetrics: Domain Analysis from 2001 to 2010 vol.28, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.2.011
  14. Domain Analysis on Electrical Engineering in Korea by Author Bibliographic Coupling Analysis vol.42, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.4.075
  15. Examining on the Relationship Between Interdisciplinarity and Research Impact with Analyzing the Journals of Library and Information Science Field vol.30, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.007
  16. Examining the Intellectual Structure of Reading Studies with Co-Word Analysis Based on the Importance of Journals and Sequence of Keywords vol.25, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.1.295
  17. Subject analysis of LIS data archived in a Figshare using co-occurrence analysis pp.1468-4527, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-12-2017-0369