A New Approach to Robustly Exchange Models in Heterogeneous CAD/CAE Environment and its Application

  • Published : 2006.06.01


The model exchange from CAD system to CAE system in valid and effective manner is the major issue of automatic analysis modelling of ship structure. However, model exchange approaches based on the neutral CAD file have resulted in invalid model exchange that could not properly reflect the characteristics of CAD model and CAE model of ship structure. This paper presents the new approach of n-to-n mapping to exchange ship structure model in heterogeneous CAD/CAE environments. In this study, the common model called 'unified ship model for analysis' to directly extract proper information from different CAD systems for ship structural analysis is proposed. Moreover, a command language based model interfacing technique to construct an idealized model for analysis job is also proposed. The proposed approach has been actually implemented in DSME CAD/CAE environment of ship structure such as TRIBON system, PATRAN system and FLUENT system. The applicability and effectiveness of the proposed approach was verified by applying it to the real analysis project for fore-body of ship and block lifting. This application results show that the proposed approach can be effectively used for heterogeneous CAD/CAE environment.


  1. Jang, B. S., Y. S. Suh, E. K. Kim, T. H. Lee, K. B. Jang and M. S. Chun. 2004. Development of integrated structural analysis system including automatic modeller for cargo hold and whole ship model. Proceedings of annual autumn meeting, Society of Naval Architecture of Korea
  2. Budin, G., C. Stops. 1996. CAD Data Repair. 5th International Meshing Roundtable, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  3. Lee, C.K. 2003. Automatic metric 3-D surface mesh generation using subdivision surface geometry model. Part 1: Construction of underlying geometric model. International journal for numerical method in Engineering. 56, 1593-1514 https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.630
  4. Cirak, F., M. Ortiz and Schroder. 2000. Subdivision surfaces: a new paradigm for thin shell finite-element analysis. International journal for numerical method in Engineering, 47, 1039-2072
  5. Moon, D. H., S.H. Han, J. H. Kim and Y. C. Oh. 2003. A set of standard modeling commands for the history-based parametric approach. Computer Aided Design, 35, 1171-1179 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(03)00022-8
  6. Dey, S., M. S. Shepard and M. K. Georges. Elimination of the adverse effects of small model features by local modifications of automatically generated meshs. Engineering with Computers, 13, 134-152 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01221211
  7. Kim, I. I. 2006. A development of data structure and mesh generation algorithm for whole ship analysis modelling system. Advances in Engineering Software, 37, 85-96 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2005.04.007
  8. Kim, I. I. and W. J. Lee. 2005. A design knowledge based mesh generation algorithm and data structure for whole ship analysis. presenting, CAD 05', Bangkok, Thailand
  9. Kwon, J. C., H. Y. Kang, O. J. Hu and J. S. Kim. 2001. CAD/CAE interface and automesh generation for ship structure. proceedings, Korean Society of CAD/CAM Engineers
  10. Lee, K. Y., I. I. Kim, D. Y. Cho and T. W. Kim. 2003. An algorithm of automatic 2D quadrilateral mesh generation with line constraints. Computer Aided Design, 35, 1055-1068 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(02)00145-8
  11. Mark, W. B., W. Joe and S. S. Mark. 2003. Accessing CAD Geometry for Mesh Generation. 12th International Meshing Roundtable, Sante-Fe, New Mexico
  12. Mezentsev, A. A. and T. Woehler. 1999. Methods and algorithms of automated CAD repair for incremental surface meshing. 8th International Meshing Roundtable, South Lake Tahoe, California
  13. Merazzi, S., E. A. Gerteisen and A. Mezentsev. 2000. A generic CAD-mesh Interface. 9th International Meshing Roundtable, New Orleans, Louisiana
  14. Owen, S. J. and D. R. White. 2001. Mesh-based geometry: A systematic approach to constructing geometry from a finite element mesh. 10th International Meshing Roundtable, Newport Beach, California
  15. Ribo, R., G. Bugeda and E. Onate. 2002. Some algorithms to correct a geometry in order to create a finite element mesh. Computer and Structures, 80, 1399-1408 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00105-0
  16. Shepard, M.S., M. W. Beall and R. M. O'Bara. 1998. Revisiting the elimination of the adverse effects of small model features in automatically generated meshes. 7th International Meshing Roundtable, Dearborn, Michigan
  17. Tautges, T. J. 2000. The common geometry module(CGM):A generic, extensible geometry interface. 9th International Meshing Roundtable, New Orleans, Louisiana
  18. Shepard, M. S. 2000. Meshing environment for geometry based analysis. International Journal for Numerical Analysis in Engineering, 47, 169-190 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000110/30)47:1/3<169::AID-NME766>3.0.CO;2-A
  19. Kim, S. H., K. P. Park, S. M. Kim, I. I. Kim, J. H. Yeon and S. H. Ha. 2005. Development of a crane lifting simulation system based on CAD/ERP/CAE environment. ICCAS
  20. Walsh, J. L. 1993. Exposing the Myths of Design to Analysis Data Exchange. Proc. ABAQUS User's Conference