Factor Influencing on the Level of Perceived Helpfulness of Country of Origin in Predicting the Quality of Chicken

닭고기의 품질 예측에서 원산지 표시의 도움에 대한 지각도에 미치는 영향요인 평가

  • Published : 2006.10.31


The purpose of this study was to measure respondent's demographic characteristics, respondent's attitudes toward chicken, and factor influencing on the level of perceived helpfulness of country of origin in predicting the quality of chicken. The data was collected through a consumer survey during the March 2006. A total number of 250 meat consumers living in Suncheon, the eastern part of Chonnam, were randomly selected as respondents. Eleven respondents did not complete the survey instrument, resulting in a final sample size of 239. All estimations were carried out using chi-square, correlation, and logistic procedure of SAS package. The results are as follows. The level of perceived helpfulness of country of origin in predicting the quality of chicken was significantly different by age and occupation of demographic variables, and was significantly correlated with respondent informed of attitude variables. The proportional odds assumption of model was not violated at p<0.05. The effects of income, occupation and respondent informed on the level of perceived helpfulness of country of origin in predicting the quality of chicken. The results from this study could be useful in developing marketing and health promotion strategies, as well as government trade policy.


Country of origin;proportional odds assumption;logistic procedure


  1. Cho JK. 2002. The effects of country of origin, message intensity, and prior knowledge on perception of product quality. Journal of Korean Association for Advertising and Public Relations, 4(2): 87-119
  2. Hwang BI, Kim BJ. 2002. Interaction effects between country of origin and product characteristics on purchasing intention. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 13(5): 202-221
  3. Jeon KS, Min SG. 1997. A study on the market penetration of imported apparel and consumer attitude toward the country of origin. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 21(2): 357-367
  4. Kim HC, Kim MR. 1997. A study for the purchase status of the imported agricultural products and consumers' recognition of the labelling for the country of orgin in Youngnam region. Korean J. Dietary Culture, 12(5): 477- 493
  5. Park JH, Lee KH. 2005. Quality characteristics of beef jerky made with beef meat of various places of origin. Korean J. Food Cookery SCI, 21(4): 528-535
  6. Phang HN, Kim KH. 2002. Opportunity and inequality: Educational stratification in Korea. Journal of Korea Socialogical Association, 36(4): 193-222
  7. Chen CK, Hughes J. 2004. Using ordinal regression model to analyze student satisfaction questionnaires. Association for Institutional Research, 1: 1-12
  8. Wall M, Heslop LA, Hofstra G. 1988. Male and female viewpoints of countries as producers of consumer goods. Journal of International Marketing, 1(1): 1-25
  9. Cho SD. 2005. The effects of ingredient brands and country of origin on consumer evaluations toward high-tech products and moderating effects of prior knowledge. Journal of Marketing Management Research, 10(1): 57-75
  10. Kim HC. 1999. A study on the consumers' perceptions and the stores' practices regarding the labeling for the country of origin. Journal of Korean Society Of Consumer Studies, 10(1): 27-42
  11. Min SG, Jeon KS. 1997. The effect of country of origin on the product evaluation and its relation to the consumer characteristics. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 32: 283-292
  12. Bacaaletti S, Nardella, M. 2000. Consumer willingness to pay for pesticide-free fresh fruit and vegetables in Italy. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 3: 297-310 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7508(01)00049-0
  13. Bender R, Benner A. 2000. Calculating ordinal regression models in SAS and S-Plus. Biometrical Journal, 42(6): 677-699 https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4036(200010)42:6<677::AID-BIMJ677>3.0.CO;2-O
  14. Hong KH, Kim CH. 1998. Study of causal model on clothing satisfaction according to country of origin effect. Journal of the Korean Society of clothing and textiles, 22(2): 215- 223
  15. Oh MY, Park JM, Jang JH. 2003. Origin effect to product imagination and purchase intention-country image model in Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Policy Analysis and Evaluation, 13(2): 23-49
  16. Juric B, Worsley A. 1998. Consumers'attitudes towards imported food products. Food Quality and Preference, 9(6): 431- 441 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00027-5
  17. Cho JH, Kim TK. 2002. An analysis of japanese consumers' preference on the country of origin of strawberry. Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy, 29(4): 577-590
  18. Hoffmann R. 2000. Country of origin-a consumer perception perspective of fresh meat. British Food Journal, 102(3): 211-229 https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700010332304
  19. Kim YW, Oh MY. 2005. Relationships among patriotism, consumer ethnocentrism, country of origin image, product, and purchase intention and the influence of perception of economic competition with a country on the relationships. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 16(2): 73-99
  20. Yu HK. 1996. Influences of brand and country of origin on consumers' perception of apparel products. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 20(3): 538-549
  21. Huang, JA, Lai CS, Tsai WC, Weng RH, Hu WH, Yang DY. 2004. Determining factors of patient satisfaction for frequent users of emergency services in a medical center. J. Chin. Med. Assoc., 67: 403-410
  22. Verbeke W, Ward RW. 2006. Consumer interest in information cues denoting quality, traceability and origin: An application of ordered probit models to beef labels. Food Quality and Preference, 17: 453-467 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.05.010
  23. Hong ST, Joner JF. 1989. Are there gender differences in the country of origin information in the evaluation of products?. Advances in Consumer Research, 16: 468-472