DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Forage Performance Evaluation of Rye Cultivars with Different Sowing Dates

파종기에 따른 호밀 품종간의 사초 생산능력

  • Published : 2006.03.01

Abstract

This experiment was carried out to determine the effects of different sowing dates and cultivars on the forage yield and quality of winter rye (Secale cereale L.). The experiment was conducted in a split plot design with three replications. The main plots consisted of two sowing dates such as early (15 September) and late (30 September). The subplots consisted of rye cultivars of five different maturity groups such as 'Kodiak' (Late), 'Koolgrazer' (Early), 'Danko' (Late), 'Homil22' (Medium) and 'Olhomi1' (Early). Dry matter (DM) content at early sowing (19.7%) was higher than those at late sowing (17.8%), while crude protein (CP) and total digestible nutrients (TDN) contents at early sowing (16.6% and 61.6%) were lower than those at late sowing (16.8% and 63.1%). Although DM content of early maturing cultivars (Koolgrazer and Olhomi1) was higher than the other cultivars, CP and TDN contents of those were lower compared to other cultivars. The contents of fiber components (ADF, NDF and cellulose) at early sowing were higher than those at late sowing, while ADL and hemicellulose at early sowing were lower than those at late sowing. ADF and cellulose of early maturing cultivars were higher than those of the other cultivars, while ADL and hemicellulose of Danko were higher than that of the other cultivars. DM, CP, In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and TDN yields at early sowing were higher than those at late sowing, and early maturing cultivars were higher than those of the other cultivars. Results of this study indicate that forage production technology in combination with early sowing and use of early maturing rye cultivar could enhance both production and quality of rye.

Keywords

Early sowing;Late sowing;Forage production technology

References

  1. 권찬호. 1991. 조․만생 사초용 호밀의 파종 및 수확기가 생장, 수량 및 사료가치에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 박사학위논문
  2. 김동암. 1983. 사료작물: 그 특성과 재배방법. 선진문화사. 서울
  3. 김동암, 성경일, 권찬호. 1986. 파종기와 파종량이 사초용 호밀의 생육특성, 월동성 및 건물수량에 미치는 영향. 한초지 6(3):164-168
  4. 김동암, 서 성, 이효원, 조무환. 1987. 외국산 도입 호밀의 청예사료로서의 생산성 비교. IV. 추파호밀 품종의 전작조건에서의 내한성과 사초수량. 한초지 7(1):55-62
  5. AOAC 1990. Official method of analysis (15th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC
  6. Holland, C., W. Kezar, W.P. Kautz, E.J. Lazowski, W.C. Mahanna and R. Reinhart. 1990. The Pioneer Forage Manual-A Nutritional Guide. Pioneer Hi-Bred Int. Inc., Des Moines, IA
  7. Klebesadel, L.J. 1967. Winter survival and spacing forage yield of winter rye varieties in Subarctic Alaska as influenced by date of planting. Agron. J. 61:708-713 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1969.00021962006100050017x
  8. Schadlich, F. 1987. Effect of sowing time and sowing rate on stand development, stem stability and yield of winter rye. Field Crop Abstr. 40(6): 396
  9. Goering, H.K. and P.J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agric. Handb. 379, U. S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC
  10. 송진달, 양종성, 박창선, 송용엽. 1985. 답리작 청예맥류 집단생산 및 이용연구. 축시연보 pp. 893-894
  11. 박형수, 김동암, 김종덕. 1999. 호밀의 사초특성, 수량 및 품질에 미치는 파종량 및 파종기의 영향. 한초지 19(2):105-114