DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A simplified analysis of catenary action in steel beams in fire and implications on fire resistant design

  • Wang, Y.C. (School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester) ;
  • Yin, Y.Z. (School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester)
  • Received : 2004.12.15
  • Accepted : 2006.03.27
  • Published : 2006.10.25

Abstract

This paper describes the results of a numerical investigation of the large deflection behaviour of steel beams under fire conditions, taking into consideration the effect of catenary action provided by the surrounding structures. The main focus is on the development, validation and application of a simplified calculation method that may be adopted in design calculations. Because no experimental result is available for validation of the simplified calculation method, the finite element program ABAQUS has been used to simulate the large deflection behaviour of a number of steel beams so as to provide alternative results for validation of the proposed method. Utilising catenary action has the potential of eliminating fire protection to all steel beams without causing structural failure in fire. However, practical application of catenary action will be restricted by concerns over large beam deflection causing integrity failure of the fire resistant compartment and additional cost of strengthening the connections and the surrounding structures to resist the catenary forces in the steel beams. This paper will provide a discussion on practical implications of utilising catenary action in steel beams as a means of eliminating fire protection. A number of examples will then be provided to illustrate the type of steel framed structure that could benefit the most from exploiting catenary action in fire resistant design.

Keywords

large deflection;fire resistant design;catenary action;steel beams;fire engineering;integrity of fire compartment

References

  1. ABAQUS (2001), Standard User's Manual, Version 6.2, Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen Inc
  2. Allam, A. M., Burgess, I. W. and Plank, R. J. (2002), 'Performance-based simplified model for a steel beam at large deflection in fire', Proc. of the 4th Int. Conf on Performance-based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods, Melbourne, Australia
  3. ASTM (2000), ASTM E119-00: Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, ASTM, United States
  4. Bailey, C. G. and Moore, D. B. (2000a), 'The structural behaviour of steel frames with composite floor slabs subjected to fire, Part 1: theory', The Structural Engineer, 78(11), 19-27
  5. Bailey, C. G. and Moore, D. B. (2000b), 'The structural behaviour of steel frames with composite floor slabs subjected to fire, Part 2: design', The Structural Engineer, 78(11), 28-33
  6. Bailey, C. G., White, D. S. and Moore, D. B. (2000), 'The tensile membrane action of unrestrained composite slabs simulated under fire conditions', Eng. Struct., 22, 1583-1595 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00110-8
  7. BSI (1987), BS 476: Fire Tests on Building Materials and Structures, Part 20: Method of Determination of the Fire Resistance of Elements of Construction (general principles), British Standards Institution, London
  8. BSI (1990), BS 5950, Structural Use of Steelwork in Building, Part 8: Code of Practice for Fire Resistant Design, British Standards Institution, London
  9. BSI (2000), BS 5950, Structural Use of Steelwork in Building, Part 1: Code of Practice for Design - Rolled and Welded sections, British Standards Institution, London
  10. Davis, Langdon and Everest (DLE) (1997), Spon's Architects' and Builders' Price Book, E & FN Spon, London
  11. Da Silva, L. S., Santiago, A. and Moore, D. B. (2004), 'Behaviour of steel joints under fire loading', Proc. of 2nd ICSCS, Seoul, Korea, 1245-1267
  12. Elghazouli, A. Y. and Izzuddin, B. A. (2000), 'Response of idealised composite beam-slab system under fire conditions', J. Construct. Steel Res., 56, 199-224 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(00)00006-7
  13. European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) (2001), ENV 1993-1-2, Eurocode 3 Design of Steel Structures, Part 1.2: General Rules / Structural Fire Design, BSI, London
  14. European Steel Design Education Programme (ESDEP 1994), Elements II, lecture 7.10.1, The Steel Construction Institute, Ascot, UK
  15. FEMA (2002), World Trade Center building performance study: data collection, preliminary observations, and recommendations, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, USA
  16. Moss, P., Buchanan, A. and Wastney, C. (2003), 'Performance of unprotected steel and composite steel frames exposed to fire, advances in structures', Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Advances in Structures (ASSCCA'03), Australia
  17. Moss, P. J., Buchanan, A. H., Sepatro, J., Wastney, C. and Welsh, R. (2004), 'Effect of support condition on the fire behaviour of steel and composite beams', Fire & Materials, 28, 159-175 https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.855
  18. Newman, G. M., Robinson, J. T. and Bailey, C. G. (2000), Fire Safety Design: A New Approach to Multi-storey Steel-framed Buildings, SCI Publication P288, The Steel Construction Institution, Ascot, UK
  19. Yin, Y. Z. (2004), 'Advanced behaviour of steel beams under fire conditions', PhD Thesis, The University of Manchester, UK
  20. Yin, Y. Z. and Wang, Y. C. (2004), 'A numerical study of large deflection behaviour of steel beams at elevated temperatures', J. Construct. Steel Res., 60, 1029-1047 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2003.09.005
  21. Yu, H. X. and Liew, J. Y. R. (2002), 'Catenary action of axially restrained steel beams at elevated temperature', Proc. of the Fifteenth KKCNN Symp. an Civil Engineering, Singapore

Cited by

  1. A performance based methodology for fire design of restrained steel beams vol.67, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.09.004
  2. Engineering Approach for Predicting Fire Response of Restrained Steel Beams vol.137, pp.7, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000244
  3. Performance Based Fire Engineering Research of Steel and Composite Structures: A Review of Joint Behaviour vol.14, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.14.4.613
  4. An analytical and numerical prediction for ductility demand on steel beam-to-column connections in fire vol.115, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.036
  5. Collapse analysis of reinforced concrete frames including bar fracture vol.19, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433215624324
  6. The influence of joints and composite floor slabs on effective tying of steel structures in preventing progressive collapse vol.66, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.10.008
  7. Response of steel beam–columns exposed to fire vol.31, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.08.020
  8. Finite element modelling of reinforced concrete framed structures including catenary action vol.88, pp.9-10, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.01.002
  9. Experimental Study on Strength of Connections to Concrete Filled Tubular in Fire vol.299-300, pp.1662-8985, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.299-300.743