A Study of Causality between Country-level IT Investment and Economic Performance in the U.S.

미국의 정보기술 투자와 경제적 성과 사이의 인과성 연구

  • 이상호 (한국국방연구소 정보화연구센터) ;
  • 김성희 (한국과학기술원 테크노경영대학원)
  • Published : 2006.06.30


This paper investigated the causal relationship between IT investment and economic performance with the office, computing and accounting machinery (OCAM) and gross domestic product (GDP) statistics from the United States for the period 1961 to 2001. Due to non-stationary aspects of the series, found by unit root tests, it was deemed applicable to apply growth models using the first difference of the series. The results indicate that IT investment growth at the country level do not only cause economic performance growth, but are also caused by economic performance growth. While IT investment growth affect economic performance growth over shorter time periods, economic performance growth affect IT investment growth over longer time periods. As a result, this study reveals IT investment growth have the preceding effect on economic performance growth, and then economic performance growth impact subsequently on IT investment growth.


  1. Baily, M.N. and Hall, R.E., 'Comments and Discussion,' Brookings Paper on Economic Activity, Vol. 2002, No. 1, 2002, pp. 182-193 https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2002.0001
  2. Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L.M., 'Computing Productivity: Firm-level Evidence,' Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 85, No. 4, 2003, pp. 793-808 https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303772815736
  3. Granger, C.W.J., 'Some Recent Developments in a Concept of Causality,' Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 39, No. 1-2, 1988, pp. 199-211 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(88)90045-0
  4. Hu, Q. and Quan, J.J., 'Evaluating the Impact of IT Investments on Productivity: A Causal Analysis of Industry Level,' International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 25, 2005, pp. 39-53 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2004.10.006
  5. OECD, OECD Factbook 2005, 2005. OECD 웹사이트에서 획득
  6. Brynjolfsson, E., 'The Contribution of Information Technology to Consumer Welfare,' Information System Research, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1996, pp. 281-300 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.3.281
  7. Kobelsky, K., Richardson, V.J., and Zmud, R.W., 'Determinants of Budgeted Information Technology Expenditures,' Proceedings of Twenty-Third International Conference on Information Systems, 2002, pp. 459-468
  8. Quantitative Micro Software, LLC., EViews 4.0 User's Guide, Irvine, CA, 2000
  9. Devaraj, S. and Kohli, R., 'Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link?,' Management Science, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2003, pp. 273-289 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.
  10. Brynjolfsson, E., 'The Productivity of Information Technology,' Communications of the ACM, Vol. 36, No. 12, 1993, pp. 67-77 https://doi.org/10.1145/153571.163272
  11. Engle, R.F. and Granger, C.W.J., 'Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing,' Econometrica, Vol. 55, No. 2, 1987, pp. 251-276 https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
  12. Lee, S. and Kim, S.H., 'A Lag Effect of IT Investment on Firm Performance,' Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 19, No, 1, pp. 43-69
  13. Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L.M., 'Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance,' Journal of Economic Perspective, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2000, pp. 23-48 https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.4.23
  14. Kohli, R. and Devaraj, S., 'Realizing the Business Value of Information Technology Investments: An Organizational Process,' MIS Quarterly Executive, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2004, pp. 53-68
  15. Granger, C.W.J., 'Testing for Causality,' Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1980, pp. 329-352 https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(80)90069-X
  16. Pindyck, R.S. and Rubinfeld, D.L., Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill Book, Singapore, 1998
  17. SAS, Examples: Bivariate Granger Causality Test, 2004. Available from
  18. Dewan, S. and Kraemer, K.L., 'International Dimensions of the Productivity Paradox,' Communications of the ACM, Vol. 41, No. 8, 1998, pp. 56-62
  19. Doms, M.E., Jarmin, R.S., and Klimek, S.D., 'Information Technology Investment and Firm Performance in US Retail Trade,' Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 13, No. 7, 2004, pp. 595-613 https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000201911
  20. Berthon, P., Pitt, L., Ewing, M., and Carr, C.L., 'Potential Research Space in MIS: A Framework for Envisioning and Evaluating Research Replication, Extension, and Generation,' Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2002, pp. 416-427 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.4.416.71
  21. Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L.M., and Yang, S., 'Intangible Assets: Computers and Organizational Capital,' Brookings Paper on Economic Activity, Vol. 2002, No. 1, 2002, pp. 137-198[An earlier version appeared as 'Intangible Assets: How the Interaction of Computers and Organizational Structure Affects Stock Market Valuations,' Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Information Systems, 1998, pp. 8-29
  22. Dutta, A., 'Telecommunications and Economic Activity: An Analysis of Granger Causality,' Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2001, pp. 71-95 https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045658
  23. Lee, S.-Y.T., Gholami, R., and Tong, T.Y., 'Time Series Analysis in the Assessment of ICT Impact at the Aggregate Level - Lessons and Implications for the New Economy,' Information and Management, Vol. 42, 2005, pp. 1009-1022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.11.005
  24. Shafer, S.M. and Byrd, T.A., 'A Framework for Measuring the Efficiency of Organizational Investments in Information Technology Using Data Envelopment Analysis,' Omega, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2000, pp. 125-141 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00039-0
  25. Tsukuda, Y. and Miyakoshi, T., 'Granger Causality between Money and Income for the Japanese Economy in the Presence of a Structural Change,' The Japanese Economic Review, Vol. 49, No. 2, 1998, pp. 191-209 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5876.00079
  26. Dedrick, J., Gurbaxani, V., and Kraemer, K.L., 'Information Technology and Economic Performance: A Critical Review of the Empirical Evidence,' ACM Computing Survey, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2003, pp. 1-28 https://doi.org/10.1145/641865.641866
  27. Dewan S. and Kraemer, K.L., 'Information Technology and Productivity: Evidence from Country-level Data,' Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2000, pp. 548-562 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.4.548.12057
  28. Hu, Q. and Plant, R., 'An Empirical Study of the Casual Relationship between IT Investment and Firm Performance,' Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2001, pp. 15-26
  29. Madden, G. and Savage, S.J., 'CEE Telecommunications Investment and Economic Growth,' Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1998, pp. 173-195 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6245(97)00020-6
  30. Shao, B.B.M. and Lin, W.T., 'Technical Efficiency Analysis of Information Technology Investments: A Two-stage Empirical Investigation,' Information and Management, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2002, pp. 391-401 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00105-7
  31. Granger, C.W.J., 'Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross- spectral Methods,' Econometrica, Vol. 37, No. 3, 1969, pp. 424-438 https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791
  32. Brynjolfsson, E. and Yang, S., 'Information Technology and Productivity: A Review of the Literature,' Advances in Computers, Vol. 43, 1996, pp. 179-214 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2458(08)60644-0
  33. Francalanci, C. and Galal, H., 'Information Technology and Work Composition: Determinants of Productivity in the Life Insurance Industry,' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1998, pp. 227-241 https://doi.org/10.2307/249396