DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Some Improvements on H-Index : Measuring Research Outputs by Citations

연구성과 측정을 위한 h-지수의 개량에 관한 연구

  • 이재윤 (경기대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Published : 2006.09.29

Abstract

The h-index, also called as Hirsch-index, is a new tool for measuring research outputs by citations. This h-index is not only easy to calculate, but also robust enough to handle various citation data. After its suggestion by Hirsch in 2005, many researchers applied the h-index to their own areas, and some others tried to improve the weak points of the h- index such as low discriminating power. Firstly, several of these efforts are reviewed in the present article, and then novel indexes are suggested to measure research outputs by citations more fairly and reasonably. Calculating these indexes on both artificial data and real data showed that the newly suggested indexes in this article can replace the h-index and its variants.

Hirsch가 제안한 h-지수는 인용을 통해서 개인의 연구 성과를 측정하려는 시도이다. h-지수는 용이한 산출 방법과 함께 지수의 강건성 등이 인정되면서 발표 이후 다양한 분야에서 이를 적용하거나 보완하는 연구가 활발히 이루어지고 있다. 이 연구에서는 우선 h-지수와 이를 보완한 g-지수를 비롯한 변형 지수에 대해서 현재까지 전개되고 있는 논의를 살펴보았다. 그리고 h-지수와 g-지수의 단점을 보완할 수 있는 개량 지수를 몇가지 제안하고 가상 자료와 실제 자료에 대해서 측정해보았다. 측정 결과 제안한 지수들이 h-지수와 g-지수를 대체할 가능성이 있음을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육인적자원부. 2004. '03년도 SCI 과학기술논문 분석 내용'. 교육인적자원부
  2. 윤희윤, 김신영. 2005. 학술지 영향계수와 연구업적 평가비중의 상관성 분석. '정보관리연구', 36(3) : 1-25
  3. Adam, D. 2002. Citation analysis: The counting house. Nature, 415 : 726-729
  4. Ball, P. 2005. Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Nature 436 : 900. https://doi.org/10.1038/436900a
  5. Banks, M. G. 2006. An extension of the Hirsch index : indexing scientific topics and compounds. Submitted to Scientometrics.
  6. Barabasi, Albert-Laszlo. 2002. Linked : The New Science of Networks Perseus Books Group Bar-Ilan , J. 2006. H-index for Price medalists revisited. ISSI Newsletter, 2(1) : 3-5
  7. Batista, P. D., M. G. Campiteli, O. Kinouchi, and A. S. Martinez. 2005. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research valid across discipline. Submitted to Scientometrics.
  8. Bornmann, L. and H. D. Daniel. 2005. Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? Scientometrics, 65(3) : 391-392 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0281-4
  9. Braun, T., W. Glnzel, and A Schubert. 2005. A Hirsch-type index for journals. The Scientist, 19(22) : 8
  10. Cronin, B., and L. Meho. 2006. Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9) : 1275-1278 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20354
  11. Egghe, L. 2006a. An improvement of the H-index : the G-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2(1), 8-9
  12. Egghe, L. 2006b. Theory and practise of the g-index. To be published in Scientometrics
  13. Glanzel, W. 2006. On the h-index : a mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 67(2) : 315-321 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0102-4
  14. Glanzel, W., and O. Persson. 2005. H-index for Price medalists. ISSI Newsletter, 1(4) : 15-18
  15. Hirsch, J. E. 2005. An index to quantify an individual's scfientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102 : 16569-16572
  16. H-number. [online]. [cited 2006.7.10].
  17. Hofbauer, R., M. Frass, B. Gmeiner, and A. D. Kaye. 2002. $Euro-Factor^{TM}$ : The New European Scientific Currency. Vienna : VICER Publishing. [online]. .
  18. Lehmann, S., A. D. Jackson, and B. E. Lautrup. 2006. Measures and mismeasures of scientific quality. [online]. [cited 2006.6.30].
  19. Moed, H. F. 2005. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer
  20. Redner, S. 1998. How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. The European Physical Journal B, 4: 131-134 https://doi.org/10.1007/s100510050359
  21. Rousseau, R. 2006a. A case study : evolution of JASIS' Hirsch index. [online]. [cited 2006.6.28].
  22. Rousseau, R. 2006b. New developments related to the Hirsch index. [online]. [cited 2006.6.28].

Cited by

  1. A Comparative Study on the Centrality Measures for Analyzing Research Collaboration Networks vol.31, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.153
  2. A Study on Document Citation Indicators Based on Citation Network Analysis vol.45, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.2.119
  3. A Study on the Analyzing International Cooperation Using Bibliometrics : Focused on LED vol.20, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2011.20.3.111
  4. Collaboration Networks and Document Networks in Informetrics Research from 2001 to 2011: Finding Influential Nations, Institutions, Documents vol.30, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.179
  5. A Study on the Impact of Economic Research Institutes in Korea using Citation Analysis of the Internet News vol.41, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2010.41.2.161