DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shear modulus and stiffness of brickwork masonry: An experimental perspective

  • Bosiljkov, Vlatko Z. (Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute (ZAG), Section for Earthquake Engineering) ;
  • Totoev, Yuri Z. (Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University Drive) ;
  • Nichols, John M. (Department of Construction Science, College of Architecture, Texas A&M University)
  • Received : 2003.05.26
  • Accepted : 2005.02.15
  • Published : 2005.05.10

Abstract

Masonry is a composite non-homogeneous structural material, whose mechanical properties depend on the properties of and the interaction between the composite components - brick and mortar, their volume ratio, the properties of their bond, and any cracking in the masonry. The mechanical properties of masonry depend on the orientation of the bed joints and the stress state of the joints, and so the values of the shear modulus, as well as the stiffness of masonry structural elements can depend on various factors. An extensive testing programme in several countries addresses the problem of measurement of the stiffness properties of masonry. These testing programs have provided sufficient data to permit a review of the influence of different testing techniques (mono and bi-axial tests), the variations caused by distinct loading conditions (monotonic and cyclic), the impact of the mortar type, as well as influence of the reinforcement. This review considers the impact of the measurement devices used for determining the shear modulus and stiffness of walls on the results. The results clearly indicate a need to re-assess the values stated in almost all national codes for the shear modulus of the masonry, especially for masonry made with lime mortar, where strong anisotropic behaviour is in the stiffness properties.

Keywords

References

  1. Asteris, P.G. (2003), 'Lateral stiffness of brick masonry infilled plane frames', J. Struct. Eng., 129(8), 1071-1079
  2. ASTM (1998), Standard Test Method for Diagonal Tension (Shear) in Masonry Assemblages. West Conshohocken, PA, American Society for Testing and Materials
  3. Bosiljkov, V. (2000), 'Experimental and numerical research on the influence of the modified mortars on the mechanical properties of the brick masonry', Slovenia, University of Ljubljana
  4. Bosiljkov, V., Page, A., Bokan-Bosiljkov, V and Zarnic, R. (2003), 'Performance based studies of in-plane loaded unreinforced masonry walls', Masonry Int., 16(2), 39-50
  5. Drysdale, R.G., Hamid, A.A. and Baker, L.R. (1994), Masonry Structures - Behavior and Design. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall. Inc. A Simon & Schuster Company
  6. Elshafie, H., Hamid, A.A. and Nasr, E. (2002), 'Strength and stiffness of masonry shear walls with openings', The Masonry Society J., 20(1)
  7. Eurocode (1995), Eurocode 6: ENV 1996-1-1:1995
  8. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Washington, FEMA
  9. Hart, G.C., Hong, W. and Englekirk, R. (1988), 'Structural component model of flexural walls', Fourth Meeting of the U.S. - Japan Technical Coordination Committee on Masonry Research, San Diego
  10. Krajcinovic, D. (1996), Damage Mechanics. New York, Elsevier
  11. Lekhnitskii, S.G. (1963), Theory of Elasticity of an Anisotropic Elastic Body. SF, Holden Day
  12. Magenes, G. and Calvi, G.M. (1997), 'In-plane seismic response of brick masonry walls', Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.,26, 1091-1112
  13. Nichols, J.M. (1990), 'Behaviour of structures - Churches', Conference on the Newcastle Earthquake, Newcastle, Institution of Engineers: Barton ACT
  14. Nichols, J.M. (2000), 'A study of the progressive degradation of masonry shear walls subjected to harmonic loading', Department of Civil, Surveying and Environmental Engineering. Newcastle, University of Newcastle: 296 p.: ill.; 30 cm. + 1 CD (4 3/4 in.) includes bibliographical references (p. 164-176)
  15. Page, A.W. (1973), Structural Brickwork - A Literature Review. Newcastle, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Newcastle
  16. Page, A.W. (1983), 'The strength of brick masonry under biaxial compression-tension', Int. J. Masonry Construction, 3(1), 26-31
  17. prEN (1993), 1052-1 Methods of Test for Masonry; Part 1: Determination of Compressive Strength
  18. Shing, P., Noland, H.S., Klamerus, E. and Schuller, M. (1991), 'Response of single-story reinforced masonry shear walls to in-plane lateral loads', Boulder, US-Japan Coordinated Program for Masonry Building Research, Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorad
  19. Tomazevic, M. (1999), Earthquake-Resistant Design of Masonry Buildings. London, Imperial College Press
  20. Turnsek, V. and Cacovic, F. (1971), 'Some experimental results on the strength of brick masonry walls', Proc. of the 2nd Int. Brick Masonry Conf., Stoke-on- Trent, British Ceramic Res. Assoc

Cited by

  1. Experimental assessment of in-plane behaviour of three-leaf stone masonry walls vol.53, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.084
  2. Experimental Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Block Masonry Walls Subjected to In-Plane Cyclic Loading vol.136, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000125
  3. Application of different in-situ testing techniques and vulnerability assessment of Kolizej palace in Ljubljana vol.13, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9639-4
  4. Deformation capacity of unreinforced masonry walls subjected to in-plane loading: a state-of-the-art review vol.5, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/2008-6695-5-22
  5. Experimental study of the in-plane cyclic behaviour of masonry walls strengthened by composite materials vol.164, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.215
  6. Analytical model for the out-of-plane response of vertically spanning unreinforced masonry walls vol.46, pp.15, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2929
  7. The importance of ambient and forced vibration measurements for the results of seismic performance assessment of buildings obtained by using a simplified non-linear procedure: case study of an old masonry building vol.11, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9494-8
  8. Seismic assessment of masonry buildings accounting for limited knowledge on materials by Bayesian updating vol.14, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9905-8
  9. In-Plane Shear Improvement of Unreinforced Masonry Wall Panels Using NSM CFRP Strips vol.17, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000400
  10. A macro-modelling approach for the analysis of infilled frame structures considering the effects of openings and vertical loads vol.12, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1030761
  11. Evaluation of the seismic performance of brick masonry walls vol.17, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.299
  12. Acquiring reference parameters of masonry for the structural performance analysis of historical buildings vol.13, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9686-x
  13. Irregular stone masonries: Analysis and strengthening with glass fibre reinforced composites vol.92, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.02.038
  14. Structural performance of reinforced interlocking blocks column vol.142, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.110
  15. Diagonal tension strength of vintage unreinforced clay brick masonry wall panels vol.43, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.015
  16. Mechanical Properties and Behavior of Traditional Adobe Wall Panels of the Aveiro District vol.27, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001194
  17. Cyclic testing of single bay steel frames with various types of masonry infill vol.51, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.026
  18. Definition of diagonal Poisson’s ratio and elastic modulus for infill masonry walls vol.47, pp.1-2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0058-9
  19. Estimates for the stiffness, strength and drift capacity of stone masonry walls based on 123 quasi-static cyclic tests reported in the literature vol.15, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0188-5