DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Microsatellite Polymorphism and Genetic Relationship in Dog Breeds in Korea

  • Cho, G.J.
  • Received : 2004.10.23
  • Accepted : 2005.02.19
  • Published : 2005.08.01

Abstract

Microsatellite polymorphism and their genetic relationships were estimated using genotype information of 183 dogs from 11 microsatellite loci. The breeds include the indigenous Korean breeds Jindo dog (30), Poongsan dog (20) and Miryang dog (44) together with Chihauhau dog (31) and German Shepherd dog (58). Jindo dogs showed the highest expected heterozygosity (0.796${\pm}$0.030) and polymorphic information contents (0.755) in all populations. The phylogenetic analysis showed the existence of two distinct clusters supported by high bootstrap values: the Korean native dogs and other dogs. They clearly show that Poongsan dog and Miryang dog are closely related to each other when compared with Jindo dog. Microsatellite polymorphism data was shown to be useful for estimating the genetic relationship between Korean native dogs and other dog breeds, and also can be applied for parentage testing in those dog breeds.

Keywords

Genetic Relationship;Korean Native Dog;Microsatellite Polymorphism

References

  1. Bowling, A. T., M. L. Eggleston-Scott, G. Byrns, R. S. Clark, S. Dileanis and E. Wictum. 1997. Validation of microsatellite markers for routine horse parentage testing. Anim. Genet. 28:247-252.
  2. Chae, Y. J., B. C. Lee and H. Lee. 1998. Paternity test in dogs by DNA analysis. Kor. J. Vet. Clin. Med. 15:274-278.
  3. Cho, G. J. and B. W. Cho. 2003. Validation of microsatellite markers for routine canine parentage testing in Korea. Kor. J. Genet. 25(2):103-108.
  4. Marshall, T. C., J. Slate, L. Kruuk and J. M. Pemberton. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7:639-655.
  5. Minch, E., A. Ruiz-Linares, D. B. Goldstein, M. W. Feldman and L. L. Cavalli-Sforza. 1995. Microsat (Version 1.4d): a Computer Program for Calculating Various Statistics on Microsatellite Allele Data. http://human.stanford.edu/microsat /microsat.html.
  6. Saitou, N. and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425.
  7. Tozaki, T., H. Kakoi, S. Mashima, K. I. Hirota, T. Hasegawa, N. Ishida, N. Miura, N. H. Choi-Miura and M. Tomita. 2001. Population study and validation of paternity testing for Thoroughbred horses by 15 microsatellite loci. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 63:1191-1197.
  8. Ota, T. 1993. DISPAN. Pennsylvania State University. PA. USA.
  9. Ha, J. H., S. E. Lee, Y. B. Tak and J. B. Kim. 1998. The physical characteristics and blood proteins of Korean native dogs. Kor. J. Anim. Sci. 40:711-720.
  10. Cho, G. J., Y. J. Yang, H. S. Kang and B. W. Cho. 2002. Genetic diversity and validation of microsatellite markers for Jeju native horse parentage testing. Kor. J. Genet. 24:359-365.
  11. Klukkowska, J., T. Strabel, M. Mackowski and M. Switonski. 2003. Microsatellite polymorphism and genetic distances between the dog, red fox and arctic fox. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 120:88-94.
  12. Li, C., Z. Wang, B. Liu, S. Yang, Z. Zhu, B. Fan, M. Yu, S. Zhao and K. Li. 2004. Evaluation of the genetic relationship among ten Chinese indigenous pig breeds with twenty-six microsatellite markers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(4):441-444.
  13. Youn, S. K., I. S. Kim and H. D. Sohn. 2001. Population genetic structure in the Jindo dog breed (Canis familiaris) detected by microsatellite DNA analysis. Kor. J. Genet. 23:25-33.
  14. Denise, S., E. Johnston, J. Halverson, K. Marshall, D. Rosenfeld, S. Mckenna, T. Sharp and J. Edwards. 2004. Power of exclusion for parentage verification and probability of match for identity in American kennel club breeds using 17 canine microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 35:14-17.
  15. Han, S. K., H. D. Byun and E. Y. Chung. 2000. Genetic diversity analysis and parentage control in Korean native cattle using microsatellite. Proc. 27th ISAG Conf. Anim. Genet. p. 88.
  16. Nei, M., F. Tajima and Y. Tateno. 1983. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. J. Mol. Evol. 19:153-170.
  17. Sun, W., H. Chang, Z. J. Ren, Z. P. Yang, R. Q. Geng, S. X. Lu, L. Du and K. Tsunoda. 2004. Genetic differentiation between sheep and goats based on microsatellite DNA. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(5):583-587.
  18. Park, J. H. 2002. Physical characteristics and genetic diversity using microsatellite DNA in Miryang dogs. A Dissertation for the Degree of Master of Science, Miryang National University.
  19. Kim, K. S. and C. B. Choi. 2002. Genetic structure of Korean native pig using microsatellite markers. Kor. J. Genet. 24:1-7.
  20. Takezaki, N. and M. Nei. 1996. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics 14:389-399.
  21. Cho, G. J. and B. W. Cho. 2004. Microsatellite DNA typing using 16 markers for parentage verification of the Korean native horse. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(6):750-754.

Cited by

  1. Microsatellite loci analysis for the genetic variability and the parentage test of five dog breeds in South Korea vol.84, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1266/ggs.84.245
  2. Quantitative Expression Analysis of Functional Genes in Four Dog Breeds vol.25, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2015.25.8.861
  3. Microsatellite analysis of genetic variation and structure in Korean and exotic dog breeds vol.37, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-015-0313-2
  4. Genome-wide analysis of the diversity and ancestry of Korean dogs vol.12, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188676