About Chromium (VI) Extraction from Fertilizers and Soils

  • Sager Manfred (Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety Spargelfeldstrasse)
  • Published : 2005.12.01

Abstract

Extractions fro fertilizer and soil samples were performed to yield the operationally defined fractions 'soluble' chromate (extractable with $NH_4NO_3$), 'exchangeable' chromate (extractable with phosphate buffer pH 7.2), and these results were compared with the data obtained by extractions with ammonium sulfate, borate buffer pH 7.2, saturated borax pH 9.6, and polyphosphate (Graham's salt). In order to maintain the pH of extractant solution about constant, the concentration of extractant buffer had to be raised to at least 0.5 M. The results strongly depended on the kind of extractant, and the solid: liquid ratio. For most of the samples investigated, the extraction efficiency increased in the order borate-sulfate-nitrate-phosphate. Whereas the recovery of $K_2CrO_4\;and\;CaCrO_4$ added to the samples of basic slags prior to the extraction was about complete, the recovery of added $PbCrO_4$ was highly variable. In soil extracts, the color reaction was interfered from co-extracted humics, which react with the chromate in weak acid solution during the time period necessary for color reaction (1 hour). However, this problem can be overcome by standard addition and subtraction of the color of the extractant solution. In soil extract of about pH < 7, organic material reduced chromate during the extraction period also, and standard addition of soluble chromate is recommended to prove recovery and the stability of chromate in the samples. In admixtures of soils and basic slags, results for hexavalent chromium were lower than from the mere basic slags. This effect was more pronounced in phosphate than in nitrate extracts. As a proficiency test, samples low in organic carbon from contaminated sites in Hungary were tested. The results from $NH_4NO_3$ extracts satisfactorily matched the results of the Hungarian labs obtained from $CalCl_2$ extractants.

References

  1. Carey P.L., McLaren R.G., Cameron K.C. and Sedcole J.R. (1996) Leaching of copper, chromium and arsenic through some free draining New Zealand soils. Austr. J. Soil Res., 34, 583-597 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9960583
  2. Puis, R.W., Clark, D.A., Paul, CJ. and Vardy, J. (1994) Transport and transformation of hexavalent chromium through soils and into ground water. J. Soil Contam., 3(2), 203-224 https://doi.org/10.1080/15320389409383463
  3. Sager, M. (1996) Discrimination between Cr(Vl) and Cr(III) load by sequential leaching methods. Die Boden-kultur, 47, 213-222
  4. Carey, P.L., Bidwell, V.J. and McLaren, R.G (2002) Chromium (VI) leaching from large undisturbed soil lysim-eters following application of a simulated copper-chromium-arsenic (CCA) timber preservative. Austr. J. Soil Res., 40, 351-365 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR01033
  5. Loyaux-Lawniczak, St., Lecomte, P., and Ehrhardt, J.J. (2001) Behavior of hexavalent chromium in a polluted groundwater: redox processes and immobilization in soils. Environ. Sci. Technol, 35, 1350-1357 https://doi.org/10.1021/es001073l
  6. Bartlett R.J. and Kimble J.M. (1976) Behavior of chromium in soils: II. Hexavalent forms. J. Environ. Qual, 5, 383 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1976.00472425000500040010x
  7. Zachara, J.M., Ainsworth, C.C., Cowan, C.E. and Resch, C.T. (1989) Adsorption of chromate by subsurface soil horizons. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 53, 418-428 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1989.03615995005300020018x
  8. Farmer, J.G., Thomas, R.P., Graham, M.C., Geelhoed, J.S., Lumsdon, D.G. and Paterson, E. (2002) Chromium spe-ciation and fractionation in ground and surface waters in the vicinity of chromite ore processing residue disposal sites. J. Environ. Monitor, 4, 235-243 https://doi.org/10.1039/b108681m
  9. Barcelo J., Poschenrieder Ch., Vazquez M.D. and Gunse B. (1993) Beneficial and toxic effects of chromium in plants: solution culture, pot and field studies. In: Environmental contamination, pp. 147-171, J.P. Vernet ed., Elsevier Amsterdam
  10. Neidhard, B., Herwald, S., Lippmann, Ch., and Straka-Emden B. (1990) Biosampling for metal speciation. I. Determination of chromate in the presence of Cr(III) by separation with cell membranes and GFAAS. Fres. J. Anal. Chem.. 337. 853-859 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323162
  11. Kozuh, N., Stupar, J., Milacic, R. and Gorenc, B. (1994) Optimization of extraction procedure for determination of total water soluble chromium and chromium (VI) in various soils. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 56, 207-217 https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319408034101
  12. OENORM M 6288 (=Austrian standard method), issued Oct. 1st 1991: Wasseruntersuchung, Bestimmung voin Chrom(VI), spektrophotometrische Methode mit 1,5 Diphenylcarbazsid
  13. Milacic, R. and Stupar, J (1995) Fractionation and oxidation of chromium in tannery waste- and sewage sludge amended soils. Environ. Sci. Technol, 29, 506-514 https://doi.org/10.1021/es00002a029
  14. Froehlich, F. (1959) Bestimmung kleiner Chromgehalte in Mineralen und Gesteinen mit Diphenylcarbazid. Fres. Z. Anal. Chem., 170, 383-387 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00449519
  15. Pilz, W. (1966) Die photometrische Mikrobestimmung kleinster Mengen Chromverbindungen in Luft. Fres. Z. Anal. Chem., 219, 350-359 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00516015