DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Availability of Heavy Metals in Soils with Different Characteristics and Controversial Points for Analytical Methods of Soil Contamination in Korea

토양특성별 중금속 유효도와 토양오염 평가방법의 개선점

  • Jung, Goo-Bok (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Environmental and Ecology Division, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Won-Il (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Environmental and Ecology Division, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Sik (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Environmental and Ecology Division, RDA) ;
  • Shin, Joung-Du (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Environmental and Ecology Division, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Ho (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Environmental and Ecology Division, RDA) ;
  • Yun, Sun-Gang (Research Development Bureau, Research Management Division, RDA)
  • 정구복 (농업과학기술원 환경생태과) ;
  • 김원일 (농업과학기술원 환경생태과) ;
  • 이종식 (농업과학기술원 환경생태과) ;
  • 신중두 (농업과학기술원 환경생태과) ;
  • 김진호 (농업과학기술원 환경생태과) ;
  • 윤순강 (농촌진흥청 연구개발국 연구관리과)
  • Published : 2005.06.30

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate available extraction capacity and potential mobility of heavy metal according to the distribution property and contamination level of heavy metals in soils and to suggest a reform measure of soil environment assessment methodology applied with soil quality and the official soil heavy metal test methods in domestic and foreign countries. The soils were collected from the natural forest paddy with long-term application of same type fertilizer, and paddies near metal mine and industrial complex. The post-treatment methods of soil were partial extraction, acid digestion and sequential extraction methods. For the heavy metal contents with different soil properties, it was shown that their natural forest and paddy soil were slightly low and similar to the general paddy soil, while their paddies near metal mine and industrial complex were higher than the standard level of Soil Environment Protection Act. Heavy metal concentrations in the soils with different soil properties had difference between $HNO_3\;and\;HNO_3+HCl$ extractant by US-EPA 3051a method. There were highly significant positive relationships in both two methods. It was appeared that the higher extractable concentration ratio with 0.1N-HCl to total heavy metal content with $HNO_3+HCl$ extractant the greater total heavy metal content. There were highly significant positive correlationship between total heavy metal content and extractable content with 0.1N-HCl. For extractable capacity of soil extractable solution compared to the total heavy metal content it was appeared that it extractable method with 0.1N-HCl was higher than those with EDTA and DTPA. In extractable ratio with 0.1N-HCl in the contaminated paddy soils near mine and industrial complex, it was shown that the lower soil pH, the higher total heavy metal content. The order of a potential mobility coefficient by distribution of heavy metal content with ie different typies in the soil was Cd>Ni>Zn>Cu>Pb. It could be known that contamination characteristics of heavy metals with different types of soils were affected by different heavy metal components, contamination degree and soil chemical properties, and heavy metal concentration with different extractable methods had great variations with adjacent environment. To be compared with assessment methodology of soil environment impact at domestic and foreign countries with our results, it might be considered that there was necessary to make a single analysis method based on total heavy metal content with environmental overloading concept because of various analysis methods for total heavy metal content and present analysis method with great variation according to soil environment. In spite of showing higher concentration of heavy metal with acidic digestion than the extractable method, it might be considered that there is need to be adjusted the national standard of soil heavy metal contamination.

Keywords

Soil;Heavy metal;Analytical method;Availability;Soil standard;Sequential extraction

References

  1. Wilma, J. F. Visser. (1993) Contaminated land policies in some industralized countries, Technical Soil Protection Committee
  2. Prieto, G. (1998) Geochemistry of heavy metals derived from gold-bearing sulphide minerals in the Marmato District (Colombia), Journal of Geochemical Exploration 64, 215-222 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-6742(98)00034-X
  3. Oh, J. Ki. (1997) Evaluation of contamination at closed mine and application methods of tailing wastes. Simposium on the remediation and application methods of environmental pollution around abandoned mine, 97-1. ILE. Forum of Environmental Policy. p.15-51
  4. ICRCL. (1987) Guidance on the assessment and redevelopment of contaminated land. JCRCL 59/83 (2nd ed.), Department of the Environment, London
  5. Eikmann, T. H. and Kloke, A. (1991) Nutzungs und schutzbezogene Orientierungswerte fur (Schad) stoffe in Boden. In: Rosenkranz, D., G. Einsele and H-M. Harress. Handbuch Bodenschutz (Handbook for Soil Protection) 3590. Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin
  6. Bachmann, G. (1993). soil values in German soil protection Paper, presented at the conference: 'Developing cleanup standards for contaminated soil, sediment and groundwater: how clean is clean?' Water Environment Federation, Washington D.C
  7. CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment). (1991) Interim canadian environmental quality criteria for contaminated sites. Report No. CCME EPC-CS34
  8. CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment). (2002) Canadian soil quality guidelines for the protection of environmental and human health
  9. COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. (1986) Directive concerning sludge amendments. Official Journal L. 181, 04/07/1986. p.6-12
  10. 환경부 (2003) 토지이용 용도별 토양오염기준 및 복원기준 마련을 위한 연구, 한국환경정책평가연구원
  11. 임수길 (1994) 토양질 기준의 설정에 관한 연구, 한국환경과학협의회. p125-135
  12. 환경부 (2004) 2003년도 토양측정망 및 실태조사 결과
  13. de Matos, A. T. Fontes. M. P. F., da Costa. L. M. and Martinez, M. A. (2000) Mobility of heavy metals as related to soil chemical and mineralogical characteristics of Brazilian soils, Environmental Pollution 111, 429-435 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(00)00088-9
  14. Jung, G. B., Kim, W. I., Moon, K. H. and Ryu, I. S. (2000) Extraction methods and availability for heavy metal in paddy soils near abandoned mining areas, Kor. J. Environ. Agric. 19, 314-318
  15. Martinez, C. E. and Motto, H. L. (2000) Solubility of lead, zinc and copper added to mineral soils, Environmental Pollution 107, 153-158 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00111-6
  16. Maiz, I., Arambarri, I., Garcia, R. and Millan, Z. (2000) Evaluation of heavy metal availability in polluted soils by two sequential extraction procedures using factor analysis, Environmental Pollution 110, 3-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00287-0
  17. Ramos, L., Hernandez, L. M. and Gonzalez, M. J. (1994) Sequential fractionation of copper, lead, cadmium, and zinc in soils from or near Donana National Park, J. Environ. Qual. 23, 50-57 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1994.00472425002300010009x
  18. Bettinelli, M., Beone, G. M., Spezia, S. and Baffi, C. (2000) Determination of heavy metals in soils and sediments by microwave-assisted digestion and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry analysis, Analytica Chimica Acta 424, 289-296 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)01123-5
  19. Sterckeman, T., Douay, F., Proix, N. and Fourrier, H. (2000) Vertical distribution of Cd, Pb, and Zn in soils near smelters in the North of France, Environmental Pollution 107, 377-389 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00165-7
  20. Kabala, C. and Singh, B. R. (2001) Fractionation and mobility of copper, lead, and zinc in soil profiles in the vicinity of a copper smelter, J. Environ. Qual. 30, 485-492 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2001.302485x
  21. Ministry of Environment. (2003) Standard Test Method for soil pollution
  22. US EPA. (1996) Microwave assisted acid dissolution of sediments, sludges, soils and oils. 2nd ed. USEP A Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC
  23. Oh C. W., Yu, Y. H., Lee, P. K., Park, S. W. and Lee. Y. Y. (2001) The controversial points and a remedy on evaluation of heavy metal contamination in standard method for examination of soil in Korea, J. of KoSSGE. 6, 63-83
  24. Oh C. W., Yu, Y. H., Lee, P. K. and Lee. Y. U. (2003) The effects of pH change in extraction solution on the heavy metals extraction from soil and controversial points for partial extraction in Korean Standard Method, Econ. Environ. Eeol. 36, 159-170
  25. Ministry of Environment. (2003) Soil Environmental Conservation Act
  26. NIAST (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology). 1999. Monitoing of the soil fertility in major agrocultural land. A counter mersuring studies to the changes of agricultural environment
  27. Jung, M. C., Jung, M. Y. and Choi, Y. W. (2004) Environmental assessment of heavy metals around abandoned metalliferous mine in Korea, Econ. Environ. Geol. 37, 21-33
  28. Ullrich, S. M., Ramsey, M. H. and Helios-Rybicka, E. (2000) Total and exchangeable of heavy metals in soils near By tom, an area of Pb/Zn mining and smelting in Upper Silesia, Poland, Applied Geochemistry 14, 187-196 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(98)00042-0

Cited by

  1. Change of Bioavailability in Heavy Metal Contaminated Soil by Chemical Amendment vol.45, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2012.45.6.973
  2. Assessment of Selected Heavy Metal Concentrations in Agricultural Soils around Industrial Complexes in Southwestern Areas of Korea vol.49, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2016.49.5.524
  3. Current research trends for heavy metals of agricultural soils and crop uptake in Korea vol.31, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2012.31.1.75
  4. Comparing Bioavailability of Cadmium and Arsenic in Agricultural Soil Under Varied pH Condition vol.48, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2015.48.1.057