Assessment of the Dieticians' Attitudes about Functional Foods and Their Needs for Training

  • Cha, Myeong-Hwa (Department of Food and Nutrition, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Park, Jyung-Rewng (Department of Food and Nutrition, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Choi, Jyung-Hwa (Department of Hotel, Restaurant, Institution Management and Dietetics)
  • Published : 2005.09.01


The object of this study was to examine attitudes and knowledge of Korean dieticians about functional foods. We investigated their perceived knowledge and their attitudes regarding risks versus benefits, and recommendation about the use of functional foods; as well as their frequency of personal use, and the educational supports and training needs of dieticians. We developed a questionnaire to assess the dieticians' attitudes related to functional foods. This questionnaire was used for characterizing functional food-related attitudes on the basis of factor and reliability analysis in the following study. The questionnaires were distributed to 802 practicing dieticians working in Daegu and Gyeongsangbukdo. A total of 244 respondents (mean age $34\pm5.7$ years) returned the completed questionnaires through online surveys. Descriptive statistics and ANOV A were used to analyze data. Fewer than $2\%$ of dieticians claimed themselves to be knowledgeable about functional foods, more than $79\%$ consumed functional foods more than once a week, and $88\%$ of dieticians expressed an interest in receiving training about functional foods. Dieticians had favorable attitudes about the rewards from functional foods but were not confident about the safety and usage recommedation of these foods. The level of knowledge and educational support at their universities about functional foods affected the dieticians' attitudes regarding the rewards from and recommendation about the use of functional foods. These results suggest a need for additional educational opportunities to facilitate a better understanding of the risks and benefits of functional foods and their proper usage. Dietetics professionals must adapt to changes in health practices through effective educational programs integrating sufficient knowledge about functional foods.


  1. Hasler CM. 1998. Functional foods: their role in disease prevention and health promotion. Food Technol 52: 63-70
  2. Ross S. 2000. Functional foods: the Food and Drug Administration perspective. Am J Clin Nutr 17: 35S-38S
  3. Hasler CM. 2000. The changing face of functional foods. J Am Coll Nutr 19: 499S-506S
  4. Sloan AE. 2003. Top 10 trends to watch and work on: 2003. Food Technol 57: 30-50
  5. Grunert KG. 2002. Current issues in the understanding of consumer food choice. Trends in Food Sci & Technol 13: 275-285
  6. Schmidt D. 1999. Message understood? Functional Foods 2: 24-26
  7. Food Marketing Institute and Prevention Magazine. 1998. A look at the self care movement. In Food Marketing. Institute/Prevention Magazine, Washington, DC
  8. Sloan AE. 2000. The top ten functional food trends. Food Technol 54: 33-62
  9. Jang KW, Park SH, Ha SD. 2003. Market trends in functional foods. Food Sci and Trends 36: 17-25
  10. Lee CH. 2004. Functional food of interest to ASEAN: from traditional experience to modern production and trading. Food Sci Biotechnol 13: 390-395
  11. Marriott BM. 2000. Functional foods: An ecologic perspective. Am J Clin Nutr 71: 1728S-1734S
  12. Hasler CM, Bloch AS, Thomson CA, Enrione E, Manning C. 2004. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Functional foods. J Am Diet Assoc 104: 814-826
  13. Anderson JV, Palombo RD, Earl R. 1998. Position of the American Dietetic Association: the role of nutrition in health promotion and disease prevention program. J Am Diet Assoc 98: 205-208
  14. Lee YK, Georgiou C, Rabb C. 2000. The knowledge, attitudes, and practices of dieticians licensed in Oregon regarding functional foods, nutrient supplements and herbs as complementary medicine. J Am Diet Assoc 100: 543-548
  15. de Jong N, Hoendervangers CT, Bleeker JK, Ocke MC. 2004. The opinion of Dutch dieticians about functional foods. J Hum Nutr Dietet 17: 55-62
  16. Roininen K, Lahteenmaki L, Tuorila H. 1999. Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods. Appetite 33: 71-88
  17. Urala N, Lahteenmaki L. 2004. Attitudes behind consumers' willingness to use functional foods. Food Qual and Pref 15: 793-803
  18. American Dietetic Association. Statement to FDA on regulation of dietary supplements. June 8, 1999. Available at: Affairs/98_ 1g060899.cfm. Accessed April 24, 2005
  19. Anderson SL. 1993. Dieticians' practices and attitudes regarding the code of ethics for the professional of dietetics. J Am Diet Assoc 93: 88-91
  20. International Food Information Council. 2002. The consumer view on functional foods: Yesterday and today. Food Light May/June: 5
  21. NBJ's annual industry overview VIII. 2003. Functional foods VI. Nutr Bus J 8: 1-9
  22. Roininen K, Tuorila H, Zandstra EH, de Graaf C, Vehkalahti K, Stubenitsky K, Mela DJ. 2001. Differences in health and taste attitudes and reported behavior among Finnish, Dutch and British consumers: A cross-national validation of the health and taste attitude scales. Appetite 37: 33-45

Cited by

  1. Health Functional Foods Advertisement Character through the Results of the Advertisement Evaluation vol.5, pp.2, 2011,