DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Development of the Quality Evaluation Standard of Web-Based Databases

웹 기반 데이터베이스의 품질평가 기준 개발에 관한 연구

  • 홍현진 (전남대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Published : 2005.06.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to design an extensive evaluation model for the quality of web-based database and to make a comparative analysis of People's awareness of the importance of assessment indices. The evaluation standard developed in this study was constituted by 19 indices and 45 elements in three different areas, including data, service and effectiveness. And a survey was conducted on database experts and nonprofessional users to find out their awareness of the importance of web-based database evaluation elements, and the findings of the study might contribute to laying the foundation for expediting more in-depth research efforts in the future.

Keywords

Web-based Database;Database Quality;Quality Evaluation;Evaluation Model

References

  1. 이제환. 2002. 공동목록 DB의 품질평가와 품질관리: KERIS의 종합목록 DB를 중심으로. '한국문헌정보학회지', 36(1): 61-89
  2. 한국데이터베이스진흥센터. 2000. '데이터베이스 품질평가 항목'. 서울: 한국데이터베이스진흥센터
  3. Edwards, J. 1998. 'The good, the bad and the useless: evaluating internet resources.' Ariadne, 16(July) [cited 2004. 10. 30].
  4. Internet Scout Project. 1997. 'The scout report for business & economics.' [cited 2004. 10. 10].
  5. Raymond, L. 1990. 'Organizational context and information system success: a contingency approach.' Journal of MIS, 6(4): 5-20
  6. Smith, A. G. 1996. 'Librarians and the web: a report on a study tour.' [cited 2004. 10. 25].
  7. Tillman, Hope N. 1996. 'Evaluating quality on the net.' [cited 2004. 10. 10].
  8. 박일종. 1996. 문헌정보학과 WWW 웹페이지의 필요성과 준비에 관한 연구. '도서관학논집', 24: 249-268
  9. Wight, T. 2004. 'The gulliver online database evaluation tool.' Australasian Public Libraries and Information Services, 17(2): 71-79
  10. Testa, E. 1998. 'ISI web select: developing web site selection criteria.' November 28. [cited 2004. 10. 25].
  11. Siegel, David. 1997. 'Secrets of successful web sites.' [cited 2004. 10. 5].
  12. Delone, W. H. and E. R. McLean. 1990. 'Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable.' Information System Research, 3(1): 60-95 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  13. Hamilton, S. and N. L. Chervany. 1981. Evaluating information system effectiveness, MIS Quarterly(Sep): 55-69
  14. 한국데이터베이스진흥센터. 2004. '2004 데이터베이스 백서'. 서울: 한국데이터베이스진흥센터
  15. Dahl, M. 2004. 'Content management strategy for a college library web site.' Information Technology and Libraries, 23(1): 23-29
  16. Ives, B. and M. H. Olson. 1983. 'User involvement and MIS success : a review of research.' Management Science, 30(5): 586-603 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.5.586
  17. Pitschmann, Louis A. 2001. Building Sustainable Collections of Free Third- Party Web Resources. Washington, D.C. : Digital Library Federation, Council on Library and Information Resources
  18. Cho, Chang-Hoan and John D. Leckenby. 1999. 'Interactivity as a measure of advertising effectiveness.' Unpubli- shed Working Paper,[URL:http://www.ciadvertising.org/studies/reports/info-process/99AAACHO.html]
  19. Davis, F. D. 1989. 'Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.' MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319-340 https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  20. 김상준. 2004. 의학 분야 Web DB의 품질평가 : PubMed와 Embase를 대상으로. '한국문헌정보학회지', 38(2): 161-187
  21. Jacobson, T. and L. Cohen. 1996. 'Evaluating internet resources.' University of Albany Library. [cited 2004. 10. 20].
  22. 김석영. 2002. 과학기술분야 해외 온라인 데이터베이스 평가 연구. '정보관리연구', 33(1): 61-80
  23. 안인자. 1997. 전자도서관의 WWW 데이터 평가기준에 대한 연구. '정보관리학회지', 14(2): 249-267
  24. Fox, C. et al. 1994. 'The notion of data and its quality dimentions.' Information Processing & Management, 30(1): 9-14 https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(94)90020-5
  25. McClure, C. R., S. K. Wyman, and J. C. Beachboard. 1997. 'Quality criteria for evaluating information resources and services available from federal web.' [cited 2004. 10. 20].
  26. 이란주, 윤소정. 1998. 도서관 웹페이지 제작에 관한 연구: 인터페이스와 정보자료구성을 중심으로. '한국문헌정보학회지', 32(4): 141-157
  27. 이응봉 외. 2001. 과학기술분야 데이터베이스의 품질향상을 위한 품질평가 연구. '한국문헌정보학회지', 35(2): 109-132
  28. Bailey, J. E. and S. W. Pearson. 1983. 'Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction.' Management Science, 29(1): 530- 545 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.5.530
  29. Caywood, C. 2002. Library selection criteria for WWW resources. [cited 2004. 9. 25].
  30. Franz, C. R. and D. Robey. 1986. 'Organizational context, user involvement, and the usefulness of information systems.' Decision Sciences, 17(3): 329-356 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1986.tb00230.x

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Quality of Academic Information Service of Internet Portal vol.31, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.2.079
  2. An Empirical Development of Knowledge and Information Value Model vol.40, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2009.40.1.113
  3. A study on Convergent & Adaptive Quality Analysis using DQnA model vol.5, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2014.5.4.021