DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of the Cultivation Method and Cutting Time on the Growth Characteristics, Dry Matter Yield and Voluntary Intake in Sorghum X Sudangrass Hybrid

재배방식과 예취시기가 수수 X 수단그라스 교잡종의 생육특성, 건물수량 및 사일리지 채식성에 미치는 영향

  • Published : 2005.03.01

Abstract

This experiments were carried out to determine growth characteristics, dry matter yield and voluntary intake of silage according to growth stage of Sorghum$\times$sudangrass(SSH) hybrid in mono-cropping and inter-cropping(C; com, T1; cutting of SSH at milk stage. T2; cutting of SSH at dough stage, T3; cutting of SSH at yellow ripe stage, T4; cutting of SSH and soybean at milk stage, T5; cutting of SSH and soybean at dough stage, T6: cutting of SSH and soybean at yellow ripe stage). Results obtained from these experiments are as follows; Plant length and leaf length of SSH(T2, T3, T4. T5 and T6)) were higher than C. T1 treatment was lower than it. C showed $2.3\~2.9$ times higher stem diameter as 29.5mm compare to SSH(T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6). soybean(T4, T5 and T6) was lower in $4.3\~5.4$ times. But SSH of inter-cropping treatment(T4, T5 and T6) showed highly comparing with mono-cropping(T1, T2 and T3) at the same maturity. Leaf rate and stem hardness of SSH(T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6) were lower than C. The fresh yield was high line with T2(72,320kg/ha), T1(69,103kg/ha), T3(68,333kg/ha) and C(57,988kg/ha), dry matter yield was high in line with T3(22.413kg/ha), T2(21,479kg/ha), C(19,252kg/ha) and T6(18,175kg/ha), (P<0.05). Protein dry matter yield was higher in T3(1,434kg/ha), C(1,386kg/ha)T5 and T6(1,345kg/ha) it was lower in T1(872kg/ha), (P<0.05). Crude protein of silage of T4 and T5 was higher than C, T2 and T3 were lower than it(P<0.05), while NDF content was not different. ADF content of T6 was higher than those of the other treatment. The highest hemi-cellulose among treatments was shown in T1 whereas T6 showed the lowest. Fresh intake of silge was 160.4, 155.8, 168.7, 172.9, 132.9, 158.7 and 185.2 g/BW for C, T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6, respectively. Dry matter intake was high in line with T6(60.3g), C(153.8g), T3(53.6g), T5(47.8g), T2(46.8g), T4(35.2g) and T1(34.48g/BW), (P<0.05). Crude protein intake was high in line with T6(3.9g), T5(3.4g), C(3.4g), T2(2.9g), T3(2.9g), T4(2.6g) and T1(2.3g/BW), (P<0.05). As mentioned above the results, mono-cropping(T3) and inter-cropping(T5 and T6) could be recommended as increasing method of sorghum $\times$ sudangrass hybrid silage utilization when silage intake of dry matter and crude protein were considered.

Keywords

References

  1. 윤익석, 1993, 예취빈도와 질소시비 수준이 Sorghum-Sudangrass hybrid의 생육과 건물수량에 미치는 영향. 건대학술지, 제 27집:193-203
  2. 이석순, 최상집, 김태주. 1991. 수확기에 따른 사일리지용 수수와 청예용 수수-수단그라스 교잡종의 사료생산성, 한초지, 11(2):121-128
  3. 이성규, 1988, Silage용 옥수수와 두과작물의 간작에 관한 연구, 1. Silage용 옥수수와 동부의 간작이 생육특성과 건물 및 유기물수량에 미치는 영향, 한초지, 8(1):47-57
  4. 이상무, 문상호, 전병태, 1999, 수수x수단그라스 교잡종과 대두와의 단작 및 간작에 따른 생육단계별 자유채식량에 관한 연구, 한초지, 19(1):63-74
  5. 전병태, 이상무, 1995, 수수x수단그라스 교잡종과 대두 간작 재배시 생육 단계에 따른 예취회수가 생육특성, 건물수량 및 조단백질 수량에 미치는 영향, 건국대학교 자연과학 연구논문지, 제 6지1, pp.5-21
  6. 한흥전, 유종원, 1988, 차광정도가 옥수수와 수수속 작물의 생육 및 건물 축적에 미치는 영향, I. 광합성에 미치는 차광의 영향, 한초지, 8(1):61-65
  7. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis(15th Ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D. C. USA
  8. Amold, G.W. and M.L. Dudzinski. 1969. The effect of pasture density and structure on what the grazing animal eats and animal productivity. N. W. S. pp. 42-48
  9. Brown, L.d. 1966. Influence of intake of feed utilization. J. Dairy. Sci. 49:223 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(66)87834-7
  10. Egharvba, P. N. 1977. A correction factor in estimation of leaf area in millet. Samaru Agri. News Letter. 19(2):84-86
  11. Gangstad, E.O. 1964. Physical and chemical composition of sorghum as related to palatability. Crop. Sci. 4:269-273 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1964.0011183X000400030009x
  12. Goering, H.L. and P.J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agr. Handbook No. 379. USDA. Washington, D. C.
  13. Herbert, S.J., D.H. Putman., M.I. Poos., A. Vargas and J.F. Creigton. 1984. Forage yield of corn and soybean in various planting patterns. agron. J. 76; 507-510 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600040001x
  14. James, R.A. and Robert K. Obura. 1983. Yield of corn, cowpea and soybean under different intercropping systems. Agron. J. 75:1005-1009 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1983.00021962007500060032x
  15. Masaoka, T.K. and N.B. Takano. 1980. studies on the digestibility of forage crop. I. Effect of plant density on the feeding value of a sorghum- sudangrass hybrid. J. Japan Grass. Sci. 26(2); 179- 184
  16. McDonald, P. 1981. The chemistry of silage. LTD. Chemistry. pp. 62-94
  17. Rabas, D.L., A.R. Schmid and G.C. Marten. 1970. Influence of temperature on the feeding growth carbohydrate composition of three alfalfa cultivars. Agron. J. 62:762 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1970.00021962006200060023x
  18. Stobbs, T.H. 1973. The effect of plant structure on the intake of tropical pasture. II. Different in sward structure, nutritive value and bite size of animal grazing. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 24;821-829 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9730821
  19. 内田仙二, 北村征生. 1987b.南西諸島で生産された暖地型牧草によるサイレジ調製 1. ローズグラ スとスタイロならびにサイラトロの混合がサイレ ジの品質に及ぼす影響.日草誌, 32(4):375-380
  20. 内田仙二, 北村征生. 1987a, 南西諸島で生産された暖地型牧草によるサイレジ調製 1. .ロース'グラ ス及び'ネピアグラスサイレジの品質に對する各種庭理の影響.日草誌 32(4):369-374
  21. 大門弘辛, 中條博良, 1986, 混作, 間作, 輪作にお ける作物の生長と窒素の動態. 第2報. エウンドウならぴソラマメとの混作が窒素吸收にぼす及影響. 日作紀 5592):162-170
  22. 文相鏑,全痢台,廣田秀憲, 李相武,金雲植. 1992. 忠州,中原地域におけるライのする研究. I. 生育段階がライ麥の自由採食量に及ぼす影響.日草誌 38(1):63・70
  23. 三秋 尙,田中重行,川村 修. 1982.ソルガ.ムサイ レジソルゴーサイレジの利用性向上に關する研究. 第3報. ソルゴーサイレジの営養價値と營養收量に及ぼ'す生産段階と刈取回数の影向について. 宮大農報. 29:311-322
  24. 石栗敏機. 1990.採食最からみたマメ科牧草の償値.牧草と園警. 38(10):15-18
  25. 松田弘行. 1981.ソルガムとサイレジ調製と利用. 日草近中誌報 9(2): 17-23
  26. 川本康博,増田泰久,五斗一郎. 1987.青刈ソルガム青刈 大豆とのにおける競争關係と收量に及ほ す密度効果, 日草誌 29(3):196-203

Cited by

  1. A Comparative Studies on the growth Characteristics and Feed Components of Sorghum × Sudangrass hybrids at Paddy Field Cultivation vol.32, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2012.32.1.29
  2. Growth Characteristics, Yield and Nutritive Values of New Teosinte, ‘Geukdong 6’ vol.36, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2016.36.2.150