DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Production of Biogenic Amines by Microflora Inoculated in Meats

  • Min, Joong-seok (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-ok (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jang, Aera (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Mooha (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Yangha (College of Human Ecology, Ewha Womans University)
  • Received : 2004.02.19
  • Accepted : 2004.07.02
  • Published : 2004.10.01

Abstract

The effects of microorganisms inoculated in beef, pork and chicken on the production of various biogenic amines (BA) were examined. Acinetobacter haemolyticus, Aeromonas hydrophila subsp. hydrophila, Alcaligenes faecalis subsp. faecalis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtilis, Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus alimentarius, Lactobacillus curvatus, Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. Mesenteroides, Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris, Pseudomonas aerugina, Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella typhimurium were inoculated into beef, pork and chicken and incubated for 24 h at optimum temperatures of each bacterium. In ground beef, total amount of amines (TAA) produced was highest in the sample inoculated with Bacillus cereus, followed by Enterobacter cloacae. In ground pork, TAA was highest in the sample inoculated with Alcaligenes faecalis, followed by Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus vulgaris and Bacillus cereus. TAA of chicken breast was highest in the sample inoculated with Alcaligenes faecalis, followed by Bacillus cereus and Lactobacillus alimentarius while in chicken leg was the sample inoculated with Proteus vulgaris, followed by Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter cloacae and Alcaligenes faecalis. Among biogenic amines produced, cadaverine (CAD) was detected at the highest level, followed by putrescine (PUT) and tyramine (TYM), their order being reversed by the kind of microorganism in beef and pork. In chicken breast and leg, CAD level was still the highest but PUT, TYM or PHM was the second highest, depending upon the kind of microorganism inoculated. In total, Alcaligenes faecalis, Enterobacter cloacae and Bacillus cereus were ones that produced a larger amount of BAs regardless of meat sources from different species.

Keywords

Biogenic Amines;Chicken;Beef;Pork;Bacteria;Total Amines

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Korea Research Foundation

Cited by

  1. Changes in the content of biologically active polyamines during pork loin storage and culinary treatments vol.226, pp.5, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-007-0625-9
  2. Biogenic Amines as a Quality Index in Shredded Cooked Chicken Breast Fillet Stored Under Refrigeration and Modified Atmosphere vol.39, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12447
  3. The evaluation of the three edible tissues of dead adult Chinese mitten crabs (Eriocheir sinensis) freshness in harvest season, based on the analysis of TVBN and biogenic amine vol.5, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3434-4
  4. Microflora of farm and hunted pheasants in relation to biogenic amines production vol.62, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-016-1008-y
  5. A review on biogenic amines in food and feed: toxicological aspects, impact on health and control measures vol.59, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN18076