Effect of the Level of Concentrates and Pasture Grazing on Growth, Feed Efficiency and Reproductive Performance in Autumn Born Hanwoo Heifers

농후사료 급여수준 및 방목이 추계분만 한우 암송아지의 성장발육, 사료이용성 및 번식능력에 미치는 효과

  • Kang, S.W. (National Livestock Research Institute, R. D. A.) ;
  • Im, S.K. (National Livestock Research Institute, R. D. A.) ;
  • Jeong, J.W. (National Livestock Research Institute, R. D. A.) ;
  • Jang , S.S. (National Livestock Research Institute, R. D. A.) ;
  • Jeon, K.J. (National Livestock Research Institute, R. D. A.)
  • 강수원 (농촌진흥청 축산기술연구소) ;
  • 임석기 (농촌진흥청 축산기술연구소) ;
  • 정종원 (농촌진흥청 축산기술연구소) ;
  • 장선식 (농촌진흥청 축산기술연구소) ;
  • 전기준 (농촌진흥청 축산기술연구소)
  • Published : 2003.12.31


Present study was conducted to investigate the effect of the level of concentrates and pasture grazing in 36 autumn born Hanwoo heifers(initial body weight, 119.7${\pm}$25.6kg) for 426d including 195d for a pasture stage. The animals were fed commercial concentrates at a rate of 0.5%(T1), 1.0%(T2), 1.5%(T3) and 2.0%(T4) of body weight, respectively, for pre- and post-pasture. 1. Mean daily gains by treatments were 0.348, 0.403, 0.450 and 0.501kg for T1, T2, T3 and T4, respectively, indicating that increases in concentrates intake was associated with the daily gain of grazing Hanwoo heifers. However, the mean daily gain was the highest for T2 during the pasture stage. 2. TDN intakes per 1kg gain were, on average, 8.61kg for the entire experimental period and 9.22kg for the pasture stage, respectively. In addition, the rate of roughage to concentrate during the entire experimental period was 49.6 to 68.2%(mean 58.5%). 3. Age reached 225 and 250kg of body weight was, on an average, 15.1mo. and 17.6mo., respectively, indicating that increasing the level of concentrates feeding(by 0.5% of body weight) reduced the first pregnancy by 0.9 mo. Ages and body weight for first service were 19.5mo. and 272.2 kg, respectively. Mean pregnant rate of total heads was approximately 52.8%, but appeared to 66.6% for T3 and T4. Therefore, it may be concluded that the optimum level of concentrates for autumn born Hanwoo heifers is 1.8% of body weight for indoor feeding on rice straw-based diet and 1.5% of body weight for a pasture stage, respectively.


Autumn born Hanwoo heifers;Concentrates feeding levels;Grazing;Growth;Reproductive performance


  1. Allen, D. M. and Kilkeny, B. 1984. Beef production from dairy bred calves. In Planned Beef Production. 2nd ed. p. 131. Granada, London, Toronto, Sydney, New York.
  2. Anderson, J. H. and Willham, R. L 1978. Weaning weight correction factors from Angus field data. J. Anim. Sci. 47:124.
  3. A.O.A.C. 1990. Official method of analysis(15th ed.), Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, D. C.
  4. Arije, J. N., Robert, N. S., Nix, J. and Rowden, L. 1971. Age and weight at puberty in Hereford heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 33(2):401.
  5. Buskirk, D. D., Faulkner, D. B. and Ireland, F. A. 1995. Increased post-weaning gain of beef heifers enhances fertility and milk production. J. Anim. Sci. 73:937.
  6. Buston, S. and Berg, R. T. 1984. Lactation performance of range beef and dairy-beef cows. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 64:253.
  7. Buston, S., Berg, R. T. and Hardin, R. T. 1980. Factors influencing weaning weights of range beef and dairy beef cows. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 60:727.
  8. Buston, S., Berg, R. T. and Hardin, R. T. 1980. Factors influencing weaning weights of range beef and dairy beef cows. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 60:727.
  9. Earley, R., Vatthaeur, R. Paulson W. and Peshel, D. 1977. Effects of nutritional level on performance of young crossbred heifers. Lancaster Cow-Calf Day Rep. p. 47.
  10. Gardner, R. W., Schuh, J. D. and Vargus, L. G. 1977. Accelerated growth and early breeding of Holstein heifers. J. Dairy. Sci. 60:1941.
  11. Lesmeister, J. L., Burfening, P. J. and Blackwell. R. L. 1973. Date of first calving in beef cows and subsequent calf production. J. Anim. Sci. 36:1.
  12. National Research Council. 1986. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.
  13. National Research Council. 1996. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 7th. National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.
  14. Moe, P. W. and Tyrrell, R. A. 1975. Efficiency of conversion of digested energy to milk. J. Dairy Sci. 58:602.
  15. Osuji, P. O. 1974. The physiology of eating and the energy expenditure of the ruminant at pasture. J. Range Management 27:437.
  16. Pinney, D. O., Stephens, D. F. and Pope. I. S. 1972. Life-time effects of winter suppli-mental feed level and age at first parturition on range beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 34:1067.
  17. SAS. 1997. SAS User's Guide: Stastics. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.
  18. Short, R. E. and Bellows, R. A. 1971. Relationships among weight gains, age at puberty and reproductive performance in beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 32:127.
  19. Standing Committee on Agriculture. 1990. Ruminants Subcommittee, Feeding Standards for Australian Livestock, Ruminant. C. S. I. R. O. Pub. East Melbourne, Australia.
  20. Stewart, T. S., Long, C. R. and Cartwright, T. C. 1980. Characterization of cattle of a five-breed diallel. Ⅲ. Puberty in bulls and heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 50:808.
  21. Swanson, E. W. 1960. Effect of rapid growth with fattening of dairy heifers on their lactational ability. J. Dairy Sci. 43:377.
  22. Swanson, E. W. 1967. Symposium on optimum growth patterns for dairy cattle J. Dairy Sci. 50(2):244.
  23. Wiltbank, J. N., Roberts, S., Nix, J. and Rowden. L. 1985. Reproductive performance and profitability of heifers fed to weight 272 or 318kg at the start of the first breeding season. J. Anim. Sci. 60(1):25.
  24. 內藤元男. 1978. 世界の牛. p. 167. 養賢堂. 東京.
  25. 山崎敏雄. 1988. 肉牛の發育と合理的な肥育樣式, 粗飼料および放牧の利用について. 養牛の夜 151:22.
  26. 農林水産技術會議事務局. 1984. 山地畜産技術マニュアル第1編. 山地畜産の基本と共通技術.
  27. 中央畜産會. 2000. 日本飼養標準 肉用牛(2000年版).
  28. 강수원, 장선식, 임석기, 정창화, 신기준. 1996. 성장단계별 농후사료 급여수준이 한우 육성 빈우의 체중변화 및 번식능력에 미치는 영향. 한영사지 20(12):136.
  29. 강수원, 정연후, 손용석, 신형태. 1992. 사양시험에 의한 경산 한우의 영양소 요구량 결정에 관한 연구. 2. 임신시 에너지 및 단백질 요구량결정에 관한 연구. 한영사지 16(3):125.
  30. 강수원, 정연후, 이병석, 손용석, 정천용. 1988. 한우 번식우의 월동기 야외사육에 관한 연구. Ⅲ. 월동기 사육환경과 영양수준이 육성빈우의 체중변화 및 번식능력에 미치는 영향. 한축지 30(10):600.
  31. 농림부 축산기술연구소. 2002. 2001년 가축개량관련자료. 2. 한육우 개량. p. 15.
  32. 농촌진흥청. 1992. 한국표준사료급여기준(한우). p. 36.
  33. 농촌진흥청. 2001. 표준영농교본. 한우. 제 3장 번식기술 p. 78.
  34. 농촌진흥청 축산기술연구소. 2002. 한국 표준사료성분표. Ⅰ. 반추가축용 사료의 조성, 소화율, 영양가. p. 1.
  35. 이근상, 나기준, 김관태. 1991. 사양형태별 한우와 Charolais 교잡종 암소의 발육과 번식능력 비교. 농업논문집(축산편) 33(1):1.
  36. 정연후, 이상철, 강수원, 정정수, 정천용. 1992a. 한우 육성빈우의 에너지와 단백질 요구량 추정. Ⅰ. 대사시험에 의한 한우 육성빈우의 에너지와 단백질요구량 결정. 한축지 34(5):293.
  37. 정연후, 이상철, 강수원, 정정수, 정천용. 1992b. 한우 육성빈우의 에너지와 단백질 요구량 추정. Ⅱ. 사양시험에 의한 한우 육성빈우의 에너지와 단백질요구량 결정. 한축지 34(6):343.
  38. 탁태영, 이상철. 1988. 한우 암소 육성비육시 에너지 및 단백질대사에 관한 연구. 농업논문집(축산편) 30(3):11.
  39. 한찬규, 박진홍, 이남형, 박영일. 1987. 한우의 번식실태 조사. 한축지 29(12):566