DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Survey of Particle Size of Total Mixed Ration in Korea

국내 TMR의 입자도에 관한 조사 연구

  • Ki, K.S. (National Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, H.S. (National Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Jeong, H.Y. (National Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, H.J. (National Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Ahn, B.S. (National Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, J.S. (National Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Kwang, S.W. (National Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Y.K. (Chungnam National University) ;
  • Ha, J.K. (Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2003.10.31

Abstract

This study was carried out to survey operation system of self-making TMR and particle size of self-making and commercial TMR, then to compare TMR particle size recommended by Penn State Particle Size Separator. Daily mixing time in self-making TMR averaged 48.6${\pm}$28.0min., 2 augar type of mixer was most by 55.5% and daily 2 times of mixing in summer and other season was 44.4 and 22.2%, respectively. Percentage of residual feed in upper sieve(19mm diameter), middle sieve(8 to 18mm diameter) and lower pen was 21.5~25.6%, 16.0~25.8%, 52.8~61.4%, respectively, at self-making TMR mixer. Percentage of particle sizes of more than 19mm in self-making and commercial TMR was 24.9${\pm}$1.4 and 26.2${\pm}$1.7%, that of 8-10mm 22.8${\pm}$1.0 and 12.8${\pm}$1.2 and that of less than 8mm 52.3${\pm}$1.7 and 61.0${\pm}$1.5, respectively, which in particle length of 8~13mm in self-making and commercial TMR was lower by 82.6 and 100% compared to that recommended by Penn State particle separator, respectively. Especially there was not particle length of more than 19mm in commercial TMR at all. It is necessary to check the number of cows ruminating in a farm in order to estimate the particle size of TMR; it is recommended to change the TMR mixing time or the TMR formulae if the proportion of ruminating cows in a farm is less than 40 %.

Keywords

TMR;Particle size;Survey;Mixer;Mixing time

References

  1. Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometerics. 11:142.
  2. Fahey, G. C. and Berger, L. L. 1988. Carbohydrate nutrition of ruminants. Page 269 in The Ruminant Animal: Digestive Physiology and Nutrition. D. C. Church, ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  3. Grant, R. J., Colenbrander, V. F. and Mertens, D. R. 1990. Milk fat depression in dairy cows: role of particle size of alfalfa hay. J. Dairy Sci. 73:1823.
  4. Jaster, E. H. and Murphy, M. R. 1983. Effects of varying particle size of forage on digestion and chewing behavior of dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 66:802.
  5. Jud Heinrichs. 1996. Evaluating particle size of forages and TMRs using the Penn State Particle Size Separator. www.das.psu.edu/dcn/catforg/particle/
  6. Linn, J. G. Management of TMR feeding programs. Feeding Total Mixed Rations to Dairy Cattle. Management of TMR feeding programs. 1995. U. S. Feeding Grains Council.
  7. Lammers, B. P., Buckmaster, D. R. and Heinrichs, A. J. 1996. A simple method for the analysis of particle size of forage and total mixed rations. J. Dairy Sci. 79:922.
  8. Martz, F. A. and Belyea, R. L. 1986. Role of particle size and forage quality in digestion and passage by cattle and sheep. J Dairy Sci. 69:1996.
  9. National Research Council. 1989. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 6th Rev. Ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC.
  10. Santini, F. J., Hardie, A. R., Jorgensen, N. A. and Finner, M. F. 1983. Proposed use of adjusted intake based on forage particle length for calculation of roughage indexes. J. Dairy Sci. 66:811.
  11. SAS. SAS/STAT. Software for PC, SAS/STAT user’s guide : Statistics. SAS inst., Cary, NC(1997).
  12. Shaver, R. D. 1990. Forage particle length in dairy rations. Page 58 in Proc. Dairy Feeding Systems Symp. Northeast Reg. Agric. Eng. Service, Harrisburg, PA.
  13. Smith, T. R. and Pritchard, D. E. 1983. An overview of. recent developments in individual concentrate feeding equipment and management. Page 150 in Proc. Second NatI. Dairy Housing Conf. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., St. Joseph, MI.
  14. Sudweeks, E. M., Ely, L. 0., Mertens, D. R. and Sisk, L. R. 1981. Assessing minimum amounts and form of roughages in ruminant diets: roughage value index system. J. Anim. Sci. 53:1406.
  15. Uden, P. 1987. The effect of grinding and pelleting hay on digestibility, fermentation rate, digesta passage and rumen and faecal particle size in cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 19:145.
  16. Weston, R. H. and Kennedy, P. M. 1984. Various aspects of reticulorumen digestive function in relation to diet and digests particle size. Page 1 in Proc. Techniques in Particle Size Analysis of Feed and Digesta in Ruminants. P. M. Kennedy, ed. Can. Soc. Anim. Sci., Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  17. Woodford, J. A., Jorgensen, N. A. and Barrington, G. P. 1986. Impact of dietary fiber and physical form on performance of lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 69:1035.
  18. Woodford, S. T. and Murphy, M. R. 1988. Effect of forage physical form on chewing activity, dry matter intake, and rumen function of dairy cows in early lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 71:674.

Cited by

  1. ) on Behavior Pattern of Growing Hanwoo Steers vol.33, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2013.33.4.290
  2. Effects of Mixing Time for Total Mixed Rations using Corn Silage on Ruminal In situ Dry Matter Degradation and Milk Production in Dairy Cows vol.34, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2014.34.4.288