DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of the Somatic Cell Count on Yield, Composition and Coagulating Properties of Mediterranean Buffalo Milk

  • Tripaldi, C. ;
  • Terramoccia, S. ;
  • Bartocci, S. ;
  • Angelucci, M. ;
  • Danese, V.
  • Received : 2002.09.02
  • Accepted : 2003.01.08
  • Published : 2003.05.01

Abstract

The monitoring was carried out for one year on 20 farms of Mediterranean buffalo situated in central Italy. The milk yield, the somatic cell count, the coagulating properties and some components were determined. The average value of somatic cells was $21.28n{\times}10^3/ml$. Milk production decreased when somatic cell numbers increased. The rennet clotting time increased significantly when somatic cells were higher than $300.00n{\times}10^3/ml$, the curd firming time was significantly higher when somatic cells were more than $1,000.00n{\times}10^3/ml$ and the curd firmness increased up to $200.00n{\times}10^3$/ml, then gradually decreased. Protein and casein decreased when somatic cells increased and the same trend was shown by casein/protein ratio. Both for these components and the coagulating properties the threshold limit of somatic cells to obtain better results was $200.00n{\times}10^3/ml$. The somatic cell number did not show a trend which was strictly influenced by the lactation stage, contrary to what happened in the other species.

Keywords

Buffalo Milk;Somatic Cells;Milk Yield;Milk Composition;Coagulating Properties

References

  1. Auldist, M. J., S. Coats, B. J. Sutherland, J. J. Mayes., G. H. Mc Dowele and G. L. Roogers. 1996. Effects of somatic cell count and stage of lactation on raw milk composition and the yield and quality of Cheddar cheese. J. Dairy Res. 63:269-280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029900031769
  2. Duranti, E. and C. Casoli. 1991. Variazione della composizione azotata e dei parametri lattodinamografici del latte di pecora in funzione del contenuto di cellule somatiche. Zoot. Nutr. Anim. 17: 99-105.
  3. Ng-Kwai-Hang, K. F., J. F. Hayes,J. E. Moxley and H. G. Monardes. 1984. Variability of test-day milk production and composition and relation of somatic cell counts with yield and compositional changes of bovine milk. J. Dairy Sci. 67:361-366. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81309-0
  4. Silva, I. D. and K. F. S. T. Silva. 1994. Total and differential cell counts in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) milk. Buffalo Journal 2: 133-137.
  5. Verdi, R. J., D. M. Barbano, M. E. Dellavalle and G. F. Senyk. 1987. Variability in true protein, casein, nonprotein nitrogen, and proteolysis in high and low somatic cell milks. J. Dairy Sci. 70: 230-242. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80002-4
  6. Verna, M., S. Bartocci, A. Amici and M. Agostini. 1993b. Prestazioni produttive di bufale in lattazione alimentate con diete a diversa concentrazione energetica e proteica. In Proceedings of 10th ASPA Congress, May 31st-June 3rd, Bologna, Italy, pp. 247-252.
  7. Coulon, J. B., C. Hurtaud, B. Remond and R. Verite. 1998. Facteurs de variation de la proportion de casines dans les prot$\'{e}$ines du lait de vache. Productions Animales 11:299-310.
  8. Zannoni, M. and S. Annibaldi. 1981. Standardization of the renneting ability of milk by Formagraph. Sci. Tec. Latt.-Cas. 32: 79-94.
  9. S.A.S. 1993. User's guide, Statistics, Sas Institute Inc., Cary (NC), USA.
  10. Tripaldi, C., G. Catillo, F. Martillotti and M. Angelucci. 1997. Influence of some characteristics of diet on milk quality of water buffalo. Buffalo Journal 13:1-13.
  11. Gill, M. S. and C. W. Holmes. 1978. Somatic cell counts, mastitis and milk production in dairy herds. New Zealand J. Dairy Sci. Techn. 13:157-161.
  12. Politis, I. and K. F. Ng-Kwai-Hang. 1988a. Effects of somatic cell count and milk composition on cheese composition and cheese making efficiency. J. Dairy Sci. 71:1711-1719. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79737-4
  13. Aschaffemburg, R. and J. Drewry. 1959. New procedure for the routine determination of the various non–casein proteins of milk. In Proceedings of IX International Dairy Congress, pp. 1631-1637
  14. Wanasinghe, D. D. 1985. Mastitis among buffaloes in Sri Lanka. In Proceeding of the 1st World Buffalo Congress, Cairo, Egypt, pp. 1331-1333.
  15. Verna, M., S. Bartocci, A. Amici and M. Agostini. 1993a. Effect of diets with different energetic concentration on the qualitative and quantitative yield in lactating buffaloes. In Proceedings of 'Prospect of buffalo production in the Mediterranean and the Middle East', EAAP Publication n. 62, pp. 258-261.
  16. Bergonier, D., G. Lagriffoul, X. Bethelot and F. Barillet. 1994. Facteurs de variation non infectieux des comptages de cellules somatiques chez les ovins et caprins laitiers. In International Symposium on 'Somatic cells and milk of small ruminants'. Sept. 25th-27th, Bella, Italy, pp. 1-20 (session 2).
  17. Anderson, M. and A. T. Andrews. 1977. Progressive changes in individual milk protein concentrations associated with high somatic cell count. J. Dairy Sci. 44:223-235.
  18. Ballou, L. U., M. Pasquini, R. D. Bremel, T. Everson and D. Sommer. 1995. Factors effecting herd milk composition and milk plasmin at four levels of somatic cell counts. J. Dairy Sci. 78: 2186-2195.
  19. Kalorey, D. R., N. V. Kurkure, N. K. Nigot, M. P. Patil and V. P. Pathak. 2001. Effect of subclinical mastitis on milk of cross bred SahiwalxJersey cows: a biochemical study. Asian-Aus. J. Anim. Sci. 14:382-383.
  20. Pilla, A. M. and B. M. Moioli. 1993. Factors affecting fat percentage, protein percentage and fat/protein ratio in buffalo milk. In Proceedings of 'Prospect of buffalo production in the Mediterranean and the Middle East', EAAP Publication n. 62, pp. 238-241.
  21. Politis, I. and K. F. Ng-Kwai-Hang. 1988b. Association between somatic cell count of milk and cheese yielding capacity. J. Dairy Sci. 71:1720-1727. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79738-6
  22. Politis, I. and K. F. Ng-Kwai-Hang. 1988c. Effects of somatic cell counts and milk composition on the coagulating properties of milk. J. Dairy Sci. 71:1740-1746. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79740-4
  23. Esposito, L., R. Di Palo, H. M. De Barros Pinto, G. Ricci and L. Zicarelli. 1997. Variations in lactodynamometric characteristics of Mediterranean buffalo milk from individual animals. In Proceedings of 5th World Buffalo Congress, Oct. 13th-16th, Caserta, Italy, pp. 225-230.
  24. Pirisi, A., G. Piredda, F. Podda and S. Pintus. 1994. Effect of somatic cell count on sheep milk composition and cheesemaking properties. In International Symposium on 'Somatic cells and milk of small ruminants'. Sept. 25th-27th, Bella, Italy, pp.7-12 (session 3).
  25. Rowland, S. J. 1938. The determination of the nitrogen distribution in milk. J. Dairy Res. 9:42-46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029900002296
  26. Muelas, R., P. Molina, J. R. Diaz and C. Peris. 1994. Relationship between somatic cell count, acidity and California Mastitis test in Manchega ewes milk. In International Symposium on 'Somatic cells and milk of small ruminants'. Sept. 25th-27th, Bella, Italy, pp.1-6 (session 3).
  27. Tantillo, G., A. Vergara and T. Manginelli. 1997. Valutazione degli aspetti igienico-sanitari del latte di bufala. Il Latte 22:70-75.
  28. Haenlein, G. F. W., L. H. Schultz and J. P. Zikakis. 1973. Composition of proteins in milk with varying leucocyte contents. J. Dairy Sci. 56:1017-1024. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(73)85299-3

Cited by

  1. Perfil da contagem de células somáticas na infecção intramamária em búfalas na Região Nordeste do Brasil vol.31, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2011000300006
  2. Relationship between mozzarella yield and milk composition, processing factors, and recovery of whey constituents vol.100, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12392
  3. ) during the transition period vol.88, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12872
  4. Buffalo milk composition, processing factors, whey constituents recovery and yield in manufacturing Mozzarella cheese pp.0, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457x.04317
  5. Cheese yield in Brazil: state of the art vol.36, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457x.17116