A Study on the Methodology for Economic and Environmental Friendliness Analysis of Back-End Nuclear Fuel Cycles

  • Published : 2003.12.30


The economic and environmental friendliness analysis of the nuclear fuel cycle options that can be expected in Korea were performed. Options considered are direct disposal, reprocessing and DUPIC (Direct Use of Spent PWR Fuel In CANDU Reactors). By considering the result of calculation of the annual uranium requirement and nuclear spent fuel generation by analysis of nuclear fuel material flows in the nuclear fuel cycle options, we decided the time of back-end nuclear fuel cycle processes and the volume. Then we can analyze the economic and environmental friendliness by applying the unit cost and unit value of each process, respectively.


  1. W.I.KO, J.W.CHOI, C.H.KANG, and J.S.LEE. Nuclear Fuel Cycle Cost Analysis Using a Probabilistic Simulation Technique, Ann. Nucl. Energy, 25, 10,7 71 (1998)
  2. KAERI. International Political Environment for the Research and Development of Nuclear Fuel Cycle, KAERI/CM-158/96 (1996)
  3. Won II Ko, Jong Won Choi, Jae Sol Lee, and Hyun Soo Park. Uncertainly Analysis in DUPIC Fuel-cycle Cost Using a Probabilistic Simulation Method. Nuclear Technology, Vol. 127, July (1999)
  4. Chow, B.G and Jones, G.S. Managing Wastes with and Without Plutonium Separation, P-8035, Rand Cooperation (1999)
  5. Won II Ko, Ho Dong Kim and Myung Seung Yang. Benefits of the DUPIC Fuel Cycle in Wastes Management. Nuclear Technology (2001)
  6. KAERI. A State-of-the-Art Report on the Evaluation Technology of the Environmental Compatibility. KAERI/AR-475/97 (1997)
  7. KAERI. A Study on the environmental Friendliness of Nuclear Fuel Cycle. KAERI/CM-185/97 (1997)
  8. OECD/NEA The Economics of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, OECD/NEA, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency (1994)