Investigation of organ dose difference of age phantoms for medical X-ray examinations

X선 촬영 시 연령별 장기선량 차이 연구

  • 박상현 (한양대학교 원자력공학과) ;
  • 이춘식 (방사선 안전 신기술 연구센터) ;
  • 김우란 (한양대학교 원자력공학과) ;
  • 이재기 (한양대학교 원자력공학과)
  • Published : 2003.03.30


Methodology for calculating the organ equivalent doses and the effective doses of pediatric and adult patients undergoing medical X-ray examinations were established. The MIRD-type mathematical phantoms of 4 age groups were constructed with addition of the esophagus to the same phantoms. Two typical examination procedures, chest PA and abdomen AP, were simulated for the pediatric patients as well as the adult as illustrative examples. The results confirmed that patients pick up approximate 0.03 mSv of effective dose from a single chest PA examination, and 0.4 to 1.7 mSv from an abdomen AP examination depending on the ages. For dose calculations where irradiation is made with a limited field, the details of the position, size and shape of the organs and the organ depth from the entrance surface considerably affect the resulting doses. Therefore, it is important to optimize radiation protection by control of X-ray properties and beam examination field. The calculation result, provided in this study, can be used to implement optimization for medical radiation protection.


  1. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1996 International Basic Safety Standards for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources, Safety series No. 115 (1996)
  2. D. G. Jones and B. F. Wall. Organ Doses from Medical X-ray Examinations Calculated Using Monte Carlo Techniques, Report NRPB-RI86, National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, Didcot, UK(1985)
  3. D. Hart, D. G. Jones and B. F. Wall, Coefficients for Estimating Effective Doses from Pediatric X-ray Examinations, Report NRPB-R279, National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, Didcot, UK(1995)
  4. W. S. Snyder, M. R. Ford and G. G. Warner, Estimates of Specific Absorbed Fraction for Photon Sources Uniformly Distributed in Various Organs of a Heterogeneous Phantom, Society of Nuclear Medicine, New York, MIRD Pamphlet No.5. Revised(1978)
  5. International Commission on Radiological Protection, 1990 Recommendation of the International commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 60, Pergamon Press, (1990)
  6. K. A. Van Riper, SABRINA User's Guide, LA-UR-93-3696, LANL (1993)
  7. LANL Group X-6, MCNP-A General Monte Carlo Code N- Particle Transport Code Version 4B, LA-12625-M(1997)
  8. United Nations Environment Programme, Radiation : Doses, Effect,. Risks, 2nd Ed, Blackwell Reference (1991)
  9. M. Zankl, N. Petoussi, and G. Drexler, ‘Effective Dose and Effective Dose Equivalent-The Impact of the New ICRP Definition for External Photon Irradiation,’ Health Phys., 62(5), 395-399 (1992)
  10. M. Cristy and K. F. Eckerman, Specific Absorbed Fractions of Energy at Various Ages from Internal Photon Sources, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL/ TM-8381/V1 (1987)
  11. D. Hart, D. G. Jones and B. F. Wall, Estimation of Effective Dose in Diagnostic Radiology from Entrance Surface Dose and Dose-Area Product Measurements, Report NRPB-R262, National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, Didcot, UK(1994)
  12. Jones, D. G. and Shrimpton, P. C. Survey of CT Practice in the UK. Part 3: Normalized Organ Doses Calculated using Monte Carlo Techniques. Chilton, NRPB-R250 (London, HMSO) (1991)