Yield and Quality of Forage Mixture as Affected by Maturity of Rye Cultivar and Oat-Rye Seeding Rate

호밀품종의 조만성과 연맥-호밀의 파종량이 혼파사초의 수량과 사료가치에 미치는 영향

  • Ko, H.J. (School of Agric. Biotechnol., Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, H.S. (School of Agric. Biotechnol., Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, S.G. (School of Agric. Biotechnol., Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, D.A. (School of Agric. Biotechnol., Seoul National University)
  • 고한종 (서울대학교 농생명공학부) ;
  • 박형수 (서울대학교 농생명공학부) ;
  • 김수곤 (서울대학교 농생명공학부) ;
  • 김동암 (서울대학교 농생명공학부)
  • Published : 2002.04.30


Evaluation works of oat in mixture with rye on forage yield have not been reported. The objective of this study was to determine yield and quality of forage mixture as affected by maturity of rye cultivar and oat-rye seeding rate at Suweon from 1999 to 2000. The experiment was arranged in a split plot design with three replications. Main plots consisted of maturity of rye. such as early(cv. Koolgrazer) and late(cv. Kodiak)maturing cultivars. Sub-plots consisted of seeding rate (T1: Oat 2000 and rye 0kg/ha, Ts: Oat 150 and rye 40kg/ha, T3: Oat100 and rye 80kg/ha, T4: Oat50 and rye 120kg/ha. and T5: Oat0 and rye 160kg/ha). Crude protein(CP) content of oat-rye mixture harvested in the fall was not influenced by maturity of rye cultivar, but that of oat-rye mixture was increased from 13.6 to 19.3% as the seeding rate of rye increased(P<0.05), however, maturity of rye cultivar significantly affected CP content of oat-rye mixture in the spring(P<0.01). Acid detergent fiber(ADF) content of oat-rye mixture harvested in the spring was not significantly affected by rye cultivar, but the ADF was decreased from 27.8 to 20.7% as the seeding rate of rye increased(P$<$0.01). When rye was harveste in the spring, ADF content of late maturing cultivar 'Kodiak' was shown as 28.0%. This was lower than that of early maturing cultivar 'Koolgrazer' which was shown as 35.8%(P$<$0.01). Among treatments, neutral detergent fiber(NDF) and in vitro dry matter digestibility(IVDMD) of oat-rye mixture showed a similar trend made on ADF. In this experiment, the highest forage yield (12.356kg/ha) was obtained from early maturing rye cultivar and seeding rates of 100kg/ha of oat and 80kg/ha of rye mixture. A significant interaction between maturity of rye cultivar and seeding rate was found(P$<$0.01). The above results indicate that an early maturing rye cultivar at the seeding rate of 100kd/ha in mixtures with 80kg/ha of oat could be recommended as a succeeding cropping system after corn for silage.


  1. A. O. A. C. 1990. Official method of analysis.(15th ed.) Washington, DC.
  2. Briggle, L. W. 1959. Growing rye. U. S. D. A. Farmers Bull. No. 2145, 16pp.
  3. Chapko, L. B., Brinkman, M. A. and Albrecht. K. A. 1991. Oat, oat-pea, barley, and barley-pea for forage yield, forage quality, and alfalfa establishment. J. Prod. Agric. 4:486-491.
  4. Cherney, J. H., Marten, G. C. and Goodrich. R. D. 1983. Rate and extent of cell wall digestion of total forage and morphological components of oats and barley. Crop Sci. 23:213-216.
  5. Goering, H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis(apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agric. Handbook 379. U. S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC.
  6. Holland, C., Kezar. W., Kautz, W. P., Lazowski, E. J., mahanna, W. C. and Reinhart. R. 1990. Pioneer forage manual : A Nutritional Guide. Pioneer Hi-bred International, Inc. : pp. 1-55.
  7. Kawas, J. R., Shaver, R. D., Wooford. J. A., Jorgensen, N. A. and rohweder, D. A. 1983. Forage quality for dairy cattle. Proc. Minn. Nutr. Conf., 4th. pp. 67-77.
  8. Milthorpe, F. L. 1961. 'The nature and analysis of competition between plants of different species,; in Mechanisms in Biological Competition. Symp. for the Soc. of Exp. Biology. 15:330-355.
  9. Moore, C. E. 1974. Production and Handling of Forages. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Pub. 369.(20pp.)
  10. Moore, J. E. 1970. Procedure for the two-stage in vitro digestion of forages. University of Florida, Department of Animal Science.
  11. Rohweder, D. A., Barnes, R. H. and Neal Jorgensen. 1977. Marketing hay on the basis of analysis. pp.24-46. Proc. 10th Res.-Ind. Conf. Am. Forage Grassl. Counc.
  12. SAS. 1999. SAS User's guide. SAS Institute, Gary, NC. USA.
  13. Steponkus, P. L. 1978. Cold hardness and freezing injury of agronomic crops. Adv. Agron. 30:51-98.
  14. Stoskopf, N. C. 1981 Understandig Crop Production. Reston Publishing Compaany, Virginia. pp. 193-220.
  15. Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 18:104-111.
  16. Undersander, D. 1996. Alternate Forage Crops. The Forager, Wisconsin Forage Council. Vol. 20. No. 2.
  17. Van Soest, P. J. and Robertson, J. B. 1980. Systems of analysis for evaluating fibrous feeds. Proc. of a workshop held in Ottawa, Canada.
  18. Walker, M. E. and Morey, D. D. 1962. Influence of Rates of N. P and K on Forage and Grain Production of Gator Rye in South Georgia. Univ. of Ga. Expt. Sta. Cir. N.S. 27, 15pp.
  19. Zavitz., C. A. 1927. Forty Years' Experiments With Grain Crops. Guelph, Canada Ontario Agric. Coll. Bull. No. 332.
  20. 권응기, 김병완, 성경일, 김창주. 1996. 호밀과 유채의 혼파비율이 생육특성, 사초수량 및 영양소 수량에 미치는 영향. 한초지. 16(2):147-154.
  21. 권찬호. 1991. 조 . 만생 사초용 호밀의 파종 및 수확시기가 생장, 수량 및 사료가치에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 박사학위논문.
  22. 김동암, 김원호. 1993. 추파사료작물이 사일리지용 옥수수의 생장, 수량 및 사료가치에 미치는 영향, 한초지, 13(2):122-138.
  23. 김동암, 김종관, 권찬호, 김원호, 한건준, 김종림. 1993. 청예사료용 연맥품종의 수량 및 사료가치비교 연구. 한초지. 13(1):66-77.
  24. 김동암. 1983. 사료작물 - 그 특성과 재배방법. 선진문화사. 서울
  25. 이무영. 1988. 중북부지방에 있어서 작부체계가 사초의 생산성과 사료가치에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 박사학위논문.
  26. 이성철. 1998. 가을철에 숙기가 다른 연맥과 유채 품종의 혼파가 사초의 건물수량 및 사료가치에 미치는 영향. 한초지. 18(4):355-360.
  27. 전병태, 이상무, 문상호. 1996. 사초용 호맥과 Red Clover의 혼작에 관한 연구. 한초지. 16(3):199-207.
  28. 한건준, 김동암. 1996. 품종과 보존제의 처리가 춘계수확 연맥의 특성과 사료가치에 미치는 영향. 한초지. 16(4):307-314.
  29. Moore, J. E. 1970. Procedure for the two-stage in vitro digestion of forages. University of Florida, Department of Animal Science.