Food Safety Behavior of Low-Income Parents and Guardians of Infants in the U.S.

  • Kwon, Junehee (Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Texas Woman′s University)
  • Published : 2002.07.01

Abstract

The U.S. government have concerned about food safety over the last two decades. The concept of the continuum, “from farm to table” was created to explore ways to prevent foodborne illnesses in all stages of food systems. On the continuum, consumers were recognized as the last line of defense to prevent foodborne illnesses, and much efforts were made to educate them safe food handling. This research was conducted to investigate infant formula handling and hand-washing behaviors of low-income families, especially parents and guardians of infants. The subject was selected from participants of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children(WIC), a federal program for low-income families in the U.S. Stratified 200 local WIC offices were randomly selected based on the number of WIC participants in each state, and 20 randomly selected WIC participants from each selected office were asked to complete questionnaires. SPSS for Windows was used for statistical analyses including frequency, cross- tabulation, and chi-square analyses. A total of 87 WIC offices returned completed question-naires (N = 1,598), and 492 were parents/guardians of infants. Most respondents were white (51.3%), high school graduates (41.5%) , and participated in WIC>1 yew. Most respondents (80.9%) teamed about food safety from WIC, and only limited number of respondents (10.2%) used the Internet for food safety information. Most respondents stored prepared formula safely (94.6%) and discarded formula left in the bottle after feeding (84.5%) , but fewer used brushes to wash formula bottles (71.3%) and boiled water(15.2%) Chi-square analyses showed respondents in different race/ethnicity had different food handling behaviors. Respondents showed generally good hand-washing behaviors as 94.2% always washing hands after using restroom, 93.2% after touching meat items, and 87.l% before preparing foods. Fewer respondents, however, washed hands after changing baby diapers (77.0%) and touching pets (67.2%). Researchers concluded that WIC education on food safety was effective, as limited food safety education covered during WIC education were followed well (e.g., storing prepared formula and discarding leftover). However, results also indicated that there were many behaviors needed to be reinforced especially to overcome family tradition and culture on food handling behaviors. The WIC may serve as good food safety resources and education agents utilizing mandatory education sessions because the vast amount of food safety information on the Internet was not readily accessible for this low-Income Population.

References

  1. Altekruse SF, Street DA, Fein SB, Levy AS (1996) : Consumer knowledge of food borne microbial hazards and food-handling practices. J Food Protection 59 : 287-294 https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-59.3.287
  2. Food Safety and Inspection Service. New consumer research driving food safety education. The Food Safety Educator. 1998 ; 3(4). Retrieved April 6, 2001, from http ://www.fsis.usda.gov/OA/educator/educator3-4.htm
  3. Maciorowski KG, Ricke SC, Birkhold SG(1999) : Consumer poultry meat handling and safety education in three Texas cities. Poultry Science 78 : 833-840 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.6.833
  4. Mead PS, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee IS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, Tauxe RV(1999) : Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 5. Retrieved March 19, 2001, from http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol5no5/mead.htm
  5. Medeiros LC, Kendall P, Hillers V, Chen G, Dimascola (2001) : Identification and classification of consumer food-handling behaviors for food safety education. J Am Diet Assoc 101 : 1337-1339
  6. Sammarco ML, Ripabelli G, Grasso GM(1997) : Consumer attitude and awareness towards food-related hygienic hazards. J. Food safety 17 : 215-221 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4565.1997.tb00188.x
  7. Sawyer C(1991) : Safety issues related to use of take-out food. J Foodservice Systems 6 : 41-59
  8. Texas Department of Health. Retrieved April 6, 2001, from http://www.tdh.state.tx.us/wichd/fin/partifact.htm
  9. The United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved April 1, 2001, from http://www.fns.usda.gov/oaneIMENUlPublished/ WICIFlLESIPC98rpt.pdf
  10. United States Department of Agriculture (2000) : Nutrition and your health : The dietary guidelines for Americans. Retrieved April 6, 2001, from http://www.usda.govlcnpp/DietGd.pdf
  11. Williamson DM, Gravani RB, Lawless HT(1992) : Correlating food safety knowledge with home food-preparation practices. Food Technology 46 : 94-100
  12. Worsfold D, Griffith CI (1997) : Assessment of the standard of consumer food safety behavior. Journal of Food Protection 60 : 399-406 https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-60.4.399
  13. Yankelovich Partners, Inc. (1999, September). Home food safety and the American consumers : A benchmark study of consumer knowledge of home food safety practices. Research summary prepared for the American Dietetic Association and Con Agra