신뢰도 물리모델을 이용한 인간신뢰도분석 연구

Human Reliability Analysis Using Reliability Physics Models

  • Moo-sung Jae (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • 발행 : 2002.09.01

Abstract

본 논문은 사고관리방안 수행에 있어서 발생되는 인적오류의 정량적 평가방법을 개발하여 공동범람 사고관리방안의 예제문제에 적용한 연구결과를 기술하고있다. PSA에서 사용되었던 기존의 인간오류평가 방법론인 THERP, HCR, SLIM-MAUD 방법의 특징을 검토하여 장단점을 기술하였다. 본 연구에서 제시하는 인간오류평가 방법론은 신뢰도물리모델을 이용하는 새로운 HRA 분석방법이다. 불확실성 분석을 위하여 MAAP 코드와 LHS 코드가 사용되었다. 본 연구를 통하여 제안하는 방법은 매우 유연하여 중대사고관리방안과 관련한 다양한 인간오류행위에 대한 평가에 사용될 수 있음을 보여주었다.

Keywords

severe accidents;human reliability;safety management;risk assesment

References

  1. D. E. Embrey, et. al,. SLIM-MAUD: An Approach to Assessing a computer-based Tech-nique for Human Error Probabilities Using Struc-tured Expert Judgment, NUREG/CR-3518, US NRC, Washington, DC, 1994
  2. G. E. Apostolakis, M. Kazarians, and D. C. Bley, Methodology for Assessing the Risk from cable Fires, Joumal. Nuclear Safety, Vol. 23, pp. 391-407, 1992
  3. Korea Electric Power Corporation, Final Safety Analysis Report for Yonggwang Units 3&4, 2000
  4. I. S. Kim, Human reliability analysis in the man -machine interface design review, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2000
  5. J. Reason, Generic Error Modeling System (GEMS) : A Cognitive Framework for Locating Common Human Error Forms in New Technology and Human Error, John Wely & Sons, Inc., NY, 1997
  6. R. L. Iman, and M. J. Shortencarier, A FORTRAM 77 Program and User Guide for the Generation of latin Hypercube and Random Samples for Use with Computer Models, SNL, NUREG/CR-624, USA, 1994
  7. A. D. Swain, and H. E. Guttmann, Handbook of human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications, NUREG/CR-1278, 1990
  8. A. J. Hannaman, et. al., Human Cognitive Reli-ability Model for PRA Analysis, NUS-4531 (EPRI), 1994
  9. J. Rasmussen, Information Processing and Human Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering, North-Holland, N. Y., 1996
  10. S. E. Cooper, A. M. Ramey-Smith, J. Wreathall, et al., A technique for human error analysis (ATHEANA), NUREG/CR-6350, USNRC, 1998
  11. G. Apostolakis, V. M. Bier, and A. Mosleh, A Critique of Recent Models for Human Error Rate Assessment, Joumal, Reliability Engineering and System Safety. Vol. 22, pp. 201-217, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(88)90074-9
  12. M. Jae, and G. E. Apostolalds, The Use of InfIu-ence Diagrams for Evaluating Severe Accident Management Strategies, Journal. Nuclear Techno-logy, Vol. 99, pp. 142-157, 1992
  13. Dimsmotr, Stephen, Operator Time Reliability Curves : A simulator DATA Based Model, STUDSVIL/NR-84/435, 1984
  14. D. D. Woods, Em. Roth and H. Pople, Cognitive Environmental Simulation: System for Human Performance Assessment, NUREG/CR-486 2, USNRC, 1997
  15. U. Bersini, P. C. Cacciabuu and G. Mancini, A Model of Operator Behavior for Man-Machine System Simulation, Joumal. Automatica, Vol. 26 (6), pp. 1025-1034, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(90)90086-W
  16. Gabor, Kenton & Associates, INC., Recommended Sensidvity Analysis for an IPE using MAAP3.0B Illinois, USA, 1999
  17. EPRI, MAAP 3.0B Users Manual-Modular Acci-dent Analysis Program for LWR Power Plants. NP-7071-CCML, 1990
  18. A. E. Greenm, and A. J. Bourne, Reliability Technology-Wiely-Interscience, London, 1972
  19. D. D. Woods, E. M. Roth, and H. Pople, Modeling Human Intention Formation for Human Reliability Assessment, Journal. Reliability Engi-neering and System Safety, Vol. 22, pp. 169-220, 1998