- Volume 15 Issue 4
DOI QR Code
Dry Matter Intake, Digestibility and Milk Yield by Friesian Cows Fed Two Napier Grass Varieties
- Gwayumba, W. (Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan) ;
- Christensen, D.A. (Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan) ;
- McKinnon, J.J. (Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan) ;
- Yu, P. (Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan)
- Received : 2001.09.06
- Accepted : 2001.11.27
- Published : 2002.04.01
The objective of this study was to compare two varieties of Napier grass (Bana Napier grass vs French Cameroon Napier grass) and to determine whether feed intake, digestibility, average daily gain (ADG) and milk yield of lactating Friesian cows from fresh cut Bana Napier grass was greater than from French Cameroon Napier grass, using a completely randomized design. Results show that Bana Napier grass had similar percent dry matter (DM), ash and gross energy (GE) to French Cameroon. Bana grass had higher percent crude protein (CP) and lower fiber fractions, acid detergent fibre (ADF), neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and lignin compared to French Cameroon. Overall the forage quality was marginally higher in Bana Napier grass compared to French Cameroon. The DM and NDF intake expressed as a percentage of body weight (BW) were similar in both Napier grass types. Both grasses had similar digestible DM and energy. Bana had higher digestible CP but lower digestible ADF and NDF than French Cameroon. Bana Napier was not different from French Cameroon when fed as a sole diet to lactating cows in terms of low DM intake, milk yield and a loss of BW and condition. To improve the efficient utilization of both Napier grass varieties, a supplement capable of supplying 1085-1227 g CP/d and 17.0-18.0 Mcal ME/d is required for cows to support moderate gains 0.22 kg/d and 15 kg 4% fat corrected milk/d.
Supported by : National Agricultural Research Centre (Kitale)
- Mwakha, E. 1972. Effect of cutting frequency on productivity of Napier and Guatemala grasses in western Kenya. E. Afric. Agric. For. J. 37:206.
- Whiteman, P. C. 1980. Tropical Pasture Science. Oxford University Press, NY. pp. 277-343.
- Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Symposium: Carbohydrate methodology, metabolism and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
- Muinga, R. W., W. Thorpe and J. H. Topps. 1992. Voluntary food intake, live weight change and lactation performance of crossbred dairy cows given ad libitum Pennisetum purpureum (Napier grass cv. Bana) supplemented with leucaena forage in the lowland semi-humid tropics. Animal Production. East Lothian, Scotland: Durrant. 55:331-337. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100021024
- Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition, AOAC, Arlington, VA.
- Rajab, M. H., H. D. Blackburn, T. C. Cartwright and E. A. P. Figueiredo. 1991. Simulation of genetic and environmental interaction of three tropical hair sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 69:4397-4405. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.69114397x
- Goldson, J. R. 1977. Napier grass in East Africa. A review. Technical Report No.24. National Agricultural Research Station, Kitale, Kenya.
- Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics . A Biometrical Approach. 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, NY.
- Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Inc. 1990. SAS User's Guide basics, Statistics, version 6 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
- Minson, D. J. 1990. Forage in Ruminant Nutrition. Harcourt Bruce Jovanovich, publishers. St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia. pp.1-58.
- Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. Official methods of analysis. 14th edition, AOAC, Washington DC.
- Combs, D. K. 1992. Dietary fiber and the ruminant. Proceedings of the 13th Western Nutrition Conference. Sept. 16-17, Saskatoon, SK. pp. 23-31.
- Fehr, M. and D. A. Christensen. 1996. Evaluation of barley-pea silage 1994. Greenbrae Dairy Herd Report. Dept. Anim. and Poultry Sci., University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon. pp. 68-71.
- Grant, R. J., P. J. Van Soest, R. E. McDowell and C. B. Perez, Jr. 1974. Intake digestibility and metabolic loss of Napier grass by cattle and buffaloes when fed wilted, chopped and whole. J. Anim. Sci. 39:423-434. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1974.392423x
- Mbugua, D. M. 1993. Effect of maturity on rumen degradation of tropical and temperate forage cell wall polysaccharides from leaves and stems. M.Sc. Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
- Mertens, D. R. 1983. Using neutral detergent fiber to formulate dairy rations and estimate the net energy content of forages. Proceedings Cornell Nutrition Conference. Nov. 1st-3rd;Syracuse, NY. pp. 60-68.
- National Research Council. 1989. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC.
- Muinga, R. W., W. Thorpe and J. H. Topps. 1993. Lactational performance of Jersey cows given Napier fodder (Pennisetum purpureum) with or without protein concentrate in semi-humid tropics. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 25:118-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236519
- Van Soest, P. J. 1982. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. O & B Books, Corvallis, OR.
- Anindo, D. O. and H. l. Potter. 1994. Seasonal variation in productivity and nutritive value of Napier grass at Muguga, Kenya. E. Afric. Agric. For. J. 59:177-285.
- Devasena, B., N. Krishna, J. R. Prasad and D. V. Reddy. 1993. Chemical composition and nutritive value of Brasilian Napier grass. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 63:776-777.
- Mukisira, E. A. and G. Khasiani. 1989. Establishing predictive equations on the intakes and digestibilties of four forages fed at various growth stages to wether sheep. In proceedings of the seventh SR-CRSP scientific workshop, 22nd-23rd Feb., Nairobi, Kenya. pp. 180-185.
- Opportunities for Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum) Improvement Using Molecular Genetics vol.7, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy7020028