Comparison Study of Nonlinear CSAS Flight Control Law Design Using Dynamic Model Inversion and Classical Gain Scheduling

항공기 CSAS 설계를 위한 고전적 Gain Scheduling 기법과 Dynamic Model Inversion 비선형 기법의 비교 연구

  • Ha, Cheol-Geun (School of Tranportation Systems Engineering, Ulsan) ;
  • Im, Sang-Su (Dept. of Transportation Mechanical Engineering, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Byeong-Su (Dept. of Transportation Mechanical Engineering, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 하철근 (울산대학교 수송시스템공학부) ;
  • 임상수 (경상대학교 수송기계공학부) ;
  • 김병수 (경상대학교 수송기계공학부)
  • Published : 2001.07.01

Abstract

In this paper we design and evaluate the longitudinal nonlinear N(aub)z-CSAS(Command and Stability Augmentation System) flight control law in \"DMI(Dynamic Model Inversion)-method\" and classical \"Gain Scheduling-method\", respectively, to meet the handling quality requirements associated with push-over pull-up maneuver. It is told that the flight control law designed in \"DM-method\" is adequate to the full flight regime without gain scheduling and is efficient to produce the time response shape desired to the handling quality requirements. On the contrary, the flight control law designed in \"Gain Scheduling-method\" is easy to be implemented in flight control computer and insensitive to variation of the actuator model characteristics.n of the actuator model characteristics.

References

  1. Nordwall, B. D., 'US F-14s to get digital controls,' Aviation Week and Space Technology, vol. 147, no. 19, 1996
  2. Lin, C. F., ed., Advanced Control System Design, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994
  3. Roskam, J., 'Airplane flight dynamics and automatic flight controls,' Roskam Aviation and Engineering Corp., Ottawa, KS, 1979
  4. McRuer, D., Ashkenas, I., and Graham, D., Aircraft Dynamics and Automatic Control, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1971
  5. Luke, J. P., Ridgely, D. B., and Walker, D. E., 'Flight controller design using mixed $H_2/H_{\infty}$-optimization with a singular $H_{\infty}$-constraint,' Proceedings of the 1994 AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA, Washington, DC, pp. 1061-1071, 1994
  6. Doyle, J. C., Zhou, K., and Bodenheimer, B., 'Optimal control with mixed $H_2$ and $H_{\infty}$ performance objectives,' Proceedings of the 1989 American Control Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989
  7. Balas, G. J., and Packard, A. K., 'The structured singular value ($\mu$) framework,' CRC Controls Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., 1996
  8. Krener, A. J., 'On the equivalence of control systems and the linearization of nonlinear systems,' SIAM Journal of Control, vol. 11, no. 4, Nov., 1973
  9. Jakubczyk, B. and Respondek, W., 'On the linearization of control systems', Bull. Acad. Polon. Ser. Math. Astronom. Phys., 33:517-522, 1980
  10. Hunt, L. R., Su, R., and Meyer, G., 'Design for multi-input nonlinear systems,' [3] Differential Geometric Control Theory, Birkhauser, pp. 268-298, 1982
  11. Krener, A. J., Isidori, A., and Respond, W., 'Partial and robust linearization by feedback,' Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE CDC, San Antonio, Texas, pp 126-130, Dec., 1983
  12. Meyer, G. and Cicolani, L., 'Application of nonlinear systems inverses to automatic flight control design,' Theory and Application of Optimal Control in Aerospace Systems, AG251, pp. 1-29, 1981
  13. Bugajski, D. J. and Enns, D. F., 'Nonlinear control law with application to high angle-of-attack flight,' Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 761-767, 1992
  14. Kim, B. S. and Calise, A. J., 'Nonlinear flight control using neural networks,' Proc. of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Scottsdale, AZ, pp. 930-940, 1994
  15. Reiner, J., Balas, G. J., and Garrard, W. L., 'Robust dynamic inversion for control of highly maneuverable aircraft,' Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 18-24, 1995
  16. Cooper, G. E., and Harper, R. P., 'The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities,' NASA-TN-D 5153, May, 1969
  17. Stevens, B. L., and Lewis, F. L., Aircraft Control and Simulation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1992