Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Who are Tweeting Research Articles and Why?
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Who are Tweeting Research Articles and Why?
Htoo, Tint Hla Hla; Na, Jin-Cheon;
  PDF(new window)
The purpose of this paper is to understand the profiles of users and their motivations in sharing research articles on Twitter. The goal is to contribute to the understanding of Twitter as a new altmetric measure for assessing impact of research articles. In this paper, we extended the previous study of tweet motivations by finding out the profiles of twitter users. In particular, we examined six characteristics of users: gender, geographic distribution, academic, non-academic, individual, and organization. Out of several, we would like to highlight here three key findings. First, a great majority of users (86%) were from North America and Europe indicating the possibility that, if in general, tweets for research articles are mainly in English, Twitter as an alternative metric has a Western bias. Second, several previous altmetrics studies suggested that tweets, and altmetrics in general, do not indicate scholarly impact due to their low correlation with citation counts. This study provides further details in this aspect by revealing that most tweets (77%) were by individual users, 67% of whom were nonacademic. Therefore, tweets mostly reflect impact of research articles on the general public, rather than on academia. Finally, analysis from profiles and motivations showed that the majority of tweets (from 42% to 57%) in all user types highlighted the summary or findings of the article indicating that tweets are a new way of communicating research findings.
Twitter;Altmetrics;User Profiling;Motivation;Psychology;
 Cited by
Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2010). Predicting the future with social media. In 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, 31 August - 3 September, 2010, 492-499.

Baldi, S. (1998). Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 829-846. crossref(new window)

Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2(1), 1-8. crossref(new window)

Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45-80. crossref(new window)

Bornmann, L. (2013). What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 217-233. crossref(new window)

Bornmann, L. (2014). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of Altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 895-903. crossref(new window)

Bush, V. (1945). Science - the endless frontier. United States Government Printing Office, Washington. Retrieved from

Cano, V., & Lind, N. C. (1991). Citation life-cycles of 10 citation-classics. Scientometrics, 22, 297312.

Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2015). Do altmetrics correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2003-2019. crossref(new window)

Doctor, V. (2012). What is a retweet? Retrieved from

Edge, D. (1977). Why I am not a co-citationist. Society for Social Studies of Science Newsletter, 2, 13-19.

Eysenbach, G. (2011). Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4), e123. crossref(new window)

Gilbert, G. N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7(1), 113-122. crossref(new window)

Godin, B., & Dore, C. (2005). Measuring the impacts of science: Beyond the economic dimension. Paper presented at the HIST Lecture, Helsinki Institute for Science and Technology Studies, Helsinki, Finland. Retrieved from

Haustein, S., Peters, I., Sugimoto, C. R., Thelwall, M., & Lariviere, V. (2014). Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 656-669. crossref(new window)

Htoo, T. H. H., & Na, J.-C. (2015). Comparison of altmetrics across multiple disciplines: Psychology, History and Linguistics. Paper presented at 4th International Conference of Asian Special Libraries (ICoASL 2015), Seoul, Korea. Retrieved from

Htoo, T. H. H., & Na, J.-C. (2017). Disciplinary differences in altmetrics for social sciences. Online Information Review, 41(2), 235-251. crossref(new window)

Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis, San Jose, California.

Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.

Kulshrestha, J., Kooti, F., Nikravesh, A., & Gummadi, K. P. (2012). Geographic dissection of the Twitter network. In ICSM Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, June 2012, Dublin, Ireland.

Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact. Nature, 411, 521.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Merton, R. K. (Ed.) (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis, 79, 606-23. crossref(new window)

Moed, H. F., Burger, W. J. M., Frankfort, J. G., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (1985). The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research Policy, 14, 131-49. crossref(new window)

Murthy, D., Gross, A., & Pensavalle, A. (2016). Urban social media demographics: An exploration of Twitter use in major American cities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(1), 33-49.

Myslín, M., Zhu, S.-H., Chapman, W., & Conway, M. (2013). Using Twitter to examine smoking behavior and perceptions of emerging tobacco products. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15 (8), e174. crossref(new window)

Na, J.-C. & Ye, Y. E. (2017). Content analysis of scholarly discussions of psychological academic articles on Facebook. Online Information Review, 41(3), 337-353. crossref(new window)

Na, J.-C. (2015). User motivations for tweeting research articles: A content analysis approach. In R. B. Allen, J. Hunter, & M. L. Zeng (Eds.), Digital Libraries: Providing Quality Information: 17th International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, ICADL 2015, Seoul, Korea, December 9-12, 2015. Proceedings (pp. 197-208). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Nations, D. (2017). What is a retweet on Twitter? An intro to retweeting other Twitter users' tweets. Retrieved from

Pielke, R. (2010). In retrospect: Science - the endless frontier. Nature, 466, 922-923. crossref(new window)

Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P. & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. Retrieved from

Priem, J., & Costello, K. L. (2010). How and why scholars cite on Twitter. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1-4.

Robinson-Garcia, N., Torres-Salinas, D., Zahedi, Z., & Costas, R. (2014). New data, new possibilities: Exploring the insides of El Profesional de la Informacion, 23(4), 359-366. crossref(new window)

Shema, H., Bar-Ilan, J., & Thelwall, M. (2015). How is research blogged? A content analysis approach. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(6), 1136-1149. crossref(new window)

Silverman, R. J. (1985). Higher education as a maturing field? Evidence from referencing practices. Research in Higher Education, 23, 150-83. crossref(new window)

Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30, 83-106.

Shuai, X., Pepe, A., & Bollen, J. (2012). How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: Article downloads, twitter mentions, and citations. PLoS ONE, 7(11), e47523. crossref(new window)

Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Lariviere, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e64841. crossref(new window)

Thelwall, M., Tsou, A., Weingart, S., Holmberg, K., & Haustein, S. (2013). Tweeting links to academic articles. Cybermetrics, 17(1), 1-8.

van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133-143. crossref(new window)

Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. (2014). How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of 'alternative metrics' in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1491-1513. crossref(new window)